Patients exposed to a surgical safety checklist experience better postoperative outcomes, but this could simply reflect wider quality of care in hospitals where checklist use is routine.

Background Enhanced recovery protocols have been proven to decrease complications and hospital stay following elective colorectal surgery. However, these principles have not yet been reported for urgent surgery procedures. We aimed to assess our initial experience with urgent colectomies performed within an established enhanced recovery pathway. Methods In a prospective cohort study, all patients undergoing colonic resection between April 2012 and March 2013 were treated according to a standardized enhanced recovery protocol. Urgent surgeries were compared with the elective procedures with regards to baseline characteristics, compliance with enhanced recovery items, and clinical outcome. Results Patients (N = 28) requiring urgent colonic resection were included and compared with patients undergoing elective colectomy (N = 63). Overall compliance with the protocol was 57 % for the urgent compared with 77 % for the elective procedures (p = 0.006). The pre-operative compliance was 64 versus 96 % (p \ 0.001), the intra-operative compliance was 77 versus 86 % (p = 0.145), and the post-operative compliance was 49 versus 67 % (p = 0.015), for the urgent and elective resections, respectively. Overall, 18 urgent patients (64 %) and 32 elective patients (51 %) developed postoperative complications (p = 0.261). Median postoperative length of stay was 8 days in the urgent setting compared with 5 days in the elective setting (p = 0.006). Conclusions Many of the intra-operative and post-operative enhanced recovery items can also be applied to urgent colectomy, entailing outcomes that approach the results achieved in the elective setting.

Background/Aims: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols for elective colorectal surgery reduce the intensity of postoperative complications, hospital stays and costs. Improvements in clinical outcome are directly proportional to the adherence to the recommended pathway (compliance). The aim of the present study was to analyze reasons for the non-compliance of colorectal surgeries with the ERAS protocol. Methods: A consecutive cohort of patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery was prospectively analyzed with regards to the surgery's compliance with the ERAS protocol. The reason for every single protocol deviation was documented and the decision was categorized based on whether it was medically justified or not. Results: During the 8-month study period, 76 patients were included. The overall compliance with 22 ERAS items was 76% (96% in the preoperative, 82% in the perioperative, and 63% in the postoperative period). The decision to deviate from the clinical pathway was mainly a medical decision, while patients and nurses were responsible in 26 and 14% of the cases, respectively. However, reasons for non-compliance were medically justified in 78% of the study participants. Conclusion: ‘Non-compliance' with the ERAS protocol was observed mostly in the postoperative period. Most deviations from the pathway were decided by doctors and in a majority of cases it appeared that they were due to a medical necessity rather than non-compliance. However, almost a quarter of deviations that were absolutely required are still amenable to improvement.

There is controversy over the use of the Ross procedure with regard to the sub-coronary and root replacement technique and its longterm durability. A systematic review of the literature may provide insight into the outcomes of these two surgical subvariants. A systematic review of reports between 1967 and February 2013 on sub-coronary and root replacement Ross procedures was undertaken. Twenty-four articles were included and divided into (i) sub-coronary technique and (ii) root replacement technique. The 10-year survival rate for a mixed-patient population in the sub-coronary procedure was 87.3% with a 95% confidence interval (CI) of 79.7-93.4 and 89.1% (95% CI, 85.3-92.1) in the root replacement technique category. For adults, it was 94 vs 95.3% (CI, 88.9-98.1) and in the paediatric series it was 90 vs 92.7% (CI, 86.9-96.0), respectively. Freedom from reoperation at 10 years was, in the mixed population, 83.3% (95% CI, 69.9-93.4) and 93.3% (95% CI, 89.4-95.9) for sub-coronary versus root replacement technique, respectively. In adults, it was 98 vs 91.2% (95% CI, 82.4-295.8), and in the paediatric series 93.3 vs 92.0% (95% CI, 86.1-96.5) for sub-coronary versus root replacement technique, respectively. The Ross procedure arguably has satisfactory results over 5 and 10 years for both adults and children. The results do not support the advantages of the sub-coronary technique over the root replacement technique. Root replacement was of benefit to patients undergoing reoperations on neoaorta and for long-term survival in mixed series.

BackgroundPostoperative hypoparathyroidism remains the most frequent complication of neck endocrine surgery. In order to reduce the incidence of this feared complication, several systems for imaging of near infrared autofluorescence (NIRAF) have been invented to help surgeons identify parathyroid glands (PTGs) and evaluate their vascularization. We evaluated the efficacy of the EleVision IR system in thyroid and parathyroid surgery.MethodsWe used the EleVision IR system in 25 patients who underwent thyroid/parathyroid surgery or both at our institution between December 2020 and July 2021. At various stages of the surgery, the surgeon first looked for PTGs with the naked eye and then completed the visual inspection with NIRAF imaging. We then compared both the naked eye and NIRAF-supported PTGs detection rates. At the end of surgery, we performed indocyanine green angiography of PTGs in 17 patients.ResultsIn total, we identified 80% of PTGs: 65% with the naked eye only and additional 15% with the assistance of the EleVision IR system. 14 of 17 patients evaluated by ICG angiography had at least one well-vascularized PTG. Only one of these patients (a case of subtotal parathyroidectomy for tertiary hyperparathyroidism) developed symptomatic postoperative hypocalcemia despite a normal parathormone level. The three other patients had at least one remaining moderately-vascularized PTG and only one patient developed transient postoperative hypoparathyroidism.ConclusionWe concluded that EleVision IR provides an efficient support for identification and evaluation of PTGs, and may be of great assistance in endocrine surgery. The images are easy to interpret even for less experienced surgeons thanks to the different types of color visualization and the possibility to measure the relative fluorescence intensity of PTGs and surrounding tissues.