Objectives: Systemic steroids are the most common first-line therapy in sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL), with significant improvement in hearing outcomes in over 60% of patients. It is unknown why 40% of patients do not respond to systemic steroid therapy. Salvage treatment includes intratympanic steroids (ITS) and hyperbaric oxygenation (HBO) therapy, with inconsistent results reported. This study aimed to compare the results of ITS and HBO therapy in patients with SSNHL that previously failed systemic steroid therapy. Design: This is a comparative retrospective nonrandomized interventional cohort study, enrolling 126 patients with SSNHL. Out of these, 35 patients received HBO therapy, 43 patients received ITS, and 48 patients did not receive any second-line therapy (control group). Pure-tone audiograms were performed before and after the salvage therapy in the IT and HBO groups and at the same time interval in the control group. Study variables included age, time until therapy initiation, tinnitus status, and hearing outcomes, with a cutoff criteria of cumulative >30 dB improvement on all frequencies indicating recovery. Results: ITS and HBO therapy were associated with statistically significant hearing recovery at all frequencies compared to systemic steroids. The results show an average hearing improvement of 13.6 dB overall frequencies (250 to 8000 Hz) after ITS therapy and 7.4 dB in HBO therapy in comparison to the control group. Presence of significant hearing improvement positively correlated with age, ITS therapy, and HBO therapy. Presence of tinnitus before therapy was negatively correlated with hearing improvement. Patients with tinnitus present at the start of therapy improve 4.67 dB less on average compared to those without tinnitus. ITS therapy significantly reduced tinnitus compared to the other two treatment options. Patients with tinnitus present before therapy significantly improve hearing at low frequencies, compared to the control group. Conclusions: ITS and HBO therapy show superior hearing results compared to observation alone after failed oral steroid therapy for SSNHL. ITS shows an additional positive impact on tinnitus reduction and shows superior hearing outcomes after salvage therapy.

BackgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic significantly affected our society and healthcare system. This study aims to evaluate the effects of COVID-19 on the number of hospitalized patients with dermatological diseases in Croatia, as well as the number of these patients treated surgically and conservatively, before (2017–2019) and during the pandemic (2020–2021).Materials and methodsThis is a retrospective, comparative study of the hospital admission rate for patients with skin, subcutaneous tissue, and breast disorders both before and during the pandemic. This study used data from the Croatian Institute of Public Health (CIPH) and the Croatian Health Insurance Fund (CHIF). Inpatient data for the CHIF data collection were categorized using the Australian Refined Diagnosis Related Groups (AR-DRGs). All hospital admissions for dermatology patients at all non-specialized hospitals in Croatia were tracked during two periods, before (2017–2019) and during the pandemic (2020–2021).ResultsThe average number of dermatology patients in all hospitals fell by 29% during the pandemic. The overall number of dermatological patients admitted to hospitals fell by 32% in 2020 and by 26% in 2021 when compared to the number of patients admitted each year on average over the preceding 3 years. Additionally, there was an average 22% fall in surgical procedures performed during the pandemic. The only exception for surgical procedures is Major Breast Reconstruction for which is noted an increase, as also for Malignant Breast Disorders, Minor Complexity and Major Skin Disorders, Minor Complexity in a group of non-surgically treated patients.ConclusionExamining the all consequences of the Croatian dermatological patient care interruption will require more investigation. Reduced access to medical care during the pandemic is anticipated to lead to later illness diagnosis, a later start to treatment, a poorer disease prognosis, as well as higher medical expenditures.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract