Concern for bacterial resistance and treatment failure with vancomycin trough concentrations < 10 μg/mL have led guidelines to increase goal concentrations. There is a paucity of data evaluating vancomycin dosage necessary to achieve goals in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). We aimed to evaluate the implementation of a new vancomycin dosing guideline in improving trough target attainment. This retrospective study evaluated neonates in the NICU treated with vancomycin between January 2009 and December 2015. Therapeutic trough concentration attainment (10-20 μg/mL) was compared between neonates receiving vancomycin per old versus new dosing guidelines. Vancomycin trough concentrations, modeled pharmacodynamic target attainment, and nephrotoxicity were compared between groups. A total of 212 vancomycin trough concentrations (n = 91 old and n = 121 new guideline) were evaluated in 182 unique neonates. The mean ± standard deviation trough concentration achieved was 18.0 ± 7.3 μg/mL vs 8.9 ± 4.8 μg/mL in the new and old guidelines, respectively (P < .01). The new guideline resulted in a higher percentage of neonates achieving trough concentrations of 10 to 20 μg/mL (62% vs 29%; P < .01) and decreased the percentage of neonates with subtherapeutic trough concentrations (9% vs 69%; P < .01). Pharmacokinetic modeling identified postmenstrual age, days of life, and urine output as predictors of vancomycin clearance and resultant trough and area under the curve values (P < .01 for all). Trough concentrations >10 μg/mL ensured area under the curve /minimum inhibitory concentration >400 in >90% of neonates when bacteria minimum inhibitory concentration was ࣘ 1 μg/mL. Nephrotoxicity was similar between groups (8.3% vs 7.7%; P = .99). In conclusion, a vancomycin nomogram designed to achieve trough concentration of 10 to 20 μg/mL improves pharmacodynamic target attainment in neonates in the NICU.

Introduction: Social determinants of health (SDOH) affect outcomes of people living with psychiatric disorders, including substance use disorders. As experts in medication optimization, pharmacists play a vital role in identifying and addressing medication-related problems associated with SDOH. However, there is a paucity of literature on how pharmacists can be part of the solution. Objective: The purpose of this article is to provide a narrative review and commentary on the intersection between SDOH, medication-related outcomes in people living with psychiatric disorders, and the role of pharmacists in addressing them. Method: The American Association of Psychiatric Pharmacists appointed an expert panel to research the issue, identify barriers, and develop a framework for including pharmacists in addressing medication therapy problems associated with SDOH in people with psychiatric disorders. The panel used Healthy People 2030 as the framework and sought input from public health officials to propose solutions for their commentary. Results: We identified potential connections between SDOH and their impact on medication use in people with psychiatric disorders. We provide examples of how comprehensive medication management can afford opportunities for pharmacists to mitigate medication-related problems associated with SDOH. Conclusion: Public health officials should be aware of the vital role that pharmacists play in addressing medication therapy problems associated with SDOH to improve health outcomes and to incorporate them in health promotion programs.