BackgroundChronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CP/CPPS) has been treated with several different interventions with limited success. This meta-analysis aims to review all trials reporting on therapeutic intervention for CP/CPPS using the National Institutes of Health-Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index (NIH-CPSI).MethodsWe searched Medline, PubMed, the Cochrane Pain, Palliative & Supportive Care Trials, the Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials, CINAHL, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the NIDDK website between 1947 and December 31, 2011 without language or study type restrictions. All RCTs for CP/CPPS lasting at least 6 weeks, with a minimum of 10 participants per arm, and using the NIH-CPSI score, the criterion standard for CP/CPPS, as an outcome measure were included. Data was extracted from each study by two independent reviewers. Gillbraith and I-squared plots were used for heterogeneity testing and Eggers and Peters methods for publication bias. Quality was assessed using a component approach and meta-regression was used to analyze sources of heterogeneity.ResultsMepartricin, percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS), and triple therapy comprised of doxazosin + ibuprofen + thiocolchicoside (DIT) resulted in clinically and statistically significant reduction in NIH-CPSI total score. The same agents and aerobic exercise resulted in clinically and statistically significant NIH-CPSI pain domain score reduction. Acupuncture, DIT, and PTNS were found to produce statistically and clinically significant reductions in the NIH-CPSI voiding domain. A statistically significant placebo effect was found for all outcomes and time analysis showed that efficacy of all treatments increased over time. Alpha-blockers, antibiotics, and combinations of the two failed to show statistically or clinically significant NIH-CPSI reductions.ConclusionResults from this meta-analysis reflect our current inability to effectively manage CP/CPPS. Clinicians and researchers must consider placebo effect and treatment efficacy over time and design studies creatively so we can more fully elucidate the etiology and role of therapeutic intervention in CP/CPPS.
Direct costs for robot-assisted surgery were significantly lower than equivalent open surgery. Factors reducing robot-assisted surgery costs included: A consistent and trained robotic surgery team, an extensive history of performing urologic robotic surgery, selection of patients for robotic surgery who otherwise would have had longer hospital stays after open surgery, and selection of procedures without a laparoscopic alternative. The high indirect costs of robot purchase and maintenance remain major factors, but could be overcome by high surgical volume and reduced prices as competitors enter the market.
Acinetobacter baumannii , particularly when carbapenem resistant (CRAB), is one of the most challenging pathogens in the health care setting. This is complicated by the fact that there is no consensus guideline regarding management of A. baumannii infections.
Background Infections caused by multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria are an increasingly common public health threat associated with worse outcomes in immunocompromised patients. Eravacycline (ERV) has potent in-vitro activity against MDR Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria and has demonstrated non-inferiority to meropenem in the phase III IGNITE4 trial; however, the trial excluded immunocompromised patients. We aimed to evaluate clinical and safety endpoints of immunocompromised patients receiving ERV as definitive therapy. Methods Multicenter, retrospective, observational study conducted from October 2018 to April 2022. Adult hospitalized immunocompromised patients treated with ERV for ≥72 hours were included. Immunocompromised patients were defined as having any of the following: chemo or radiation therapy < 30 days of hospital admission, HIV/AIDS with CD4 < 200, chronic steroids ( >40 mg prednisone or equivalent. The primary outcome was 30-day survival. Secondary outcomes were lack of 30-day infection recurrence and drug-related safety events. Results Overall, 75 immunocompromised patients treated with ERV were included from 17 United States medical centers. Median (IQR) age was 62 (53-70) and 61.6% were male. Hospital length of stay was 28 (13-42) days and 67% were admitted to the intensive care unit. SOFA and APACHE II scores were 3.5 (1-7) and 16 (11-20), respectively. Common infection sources were intra-abdominal (26%) and lower respiratory tract (18%); 24% were bacteremic. Most patients had cultured Enterobacterales (58.7%) and Enterococci (37%) spp. infections. Of those, 21.3% were CRE and 19% were VRE. Infectious diseases consult was obtained in 91.8% of cases. Time elapsed from index culture collection to ERV initiation was 4 (2-8) days and duration of ERV therapy was 7 (4-12) days. In total, 81.3% of immunocompromised patients achieved 30-day survival and 90.7% did not have 30-day infection recurrence. Probable drug-related adverse events occurred in 5.3% of patients (GI 4%, rash 1%). Conclusion A majority of immunocompromised patients receiving ERV as definitive therapy achieved 30-day survival and did not experience infection recurrence. ERV use in immunocompromised subpopulations will benefit from studies tailored to their specific characteristics. Disclosures Kimberly C. Claeys, PharmD, BioFire Diagnostics: Honoraria Bruce M. Jones, Pharm.D., FIDSA, BCPS, AbbVie: Advisor/Consultant|AbbVie: Honoraria|La Jolla: Honoraria|Melinta: Advisor/Consultant|Paratek: Honoraria|Regeneron: Honoraria.
Background Eravacycline (ERV) is Food and Drug Administration approved in patients for the treatment of adults complicated intra-abdominal infections in 2018. Real-world data regarding the indications for ERV use are is limited. We evaluated the clinical/safety outcomes of patients treated with ERV in FDA and non-FDA approved indications. Methods Multicenter, retrospective, observational study from September 2018 to June 2020. Adult patients treated with ERV for ³ 72 hours were included. The primary outcome was 30-day survival. Secondary outcomes included a lack of 30-day infection-recurrence, resolution of signs/symptoms of infection and safety. All outcomes were measured from ERV start date. Results Overall, 108 patients were included from 12 geographically-distinct medical centers across the United States. The median(IQR) age was 60(52-67) years and 60% were male. Median(IQR) APACHE II and Charlson Comorbidity scores were 15(11-21) and 3 (2-6), respectively. The most common sources of infection were intra-abdominal (32%), and respiratory (24%). Common pathogens included Acinetobacter baumannii (19%), Klebsiella pneumoniae and Enterococcus faecium (16%). Infectious diseases consultation was obtained in 98%, and surgical interventions in 51% of cases. Patients often received active therapy prior to ERV(40%). Median(IQR) ERV therapy duration was 7.7(4.4-14.0) days. Among cases with documented cultures, ERV was initiated within a median(IQR) of 4.8(2.5-9.9) days. Combination therapy ³ 48 hours was given in 45%. The primary endpoint was achieved in 79%(85/108). Of patients who died(n=23), 57% were on monotherapy, 39% were critically ill, 39% had intra-abdominal as a source, and 30% had positive blood cultures. For secondary outcomes, 94%(102/108) lacked 30-day infection-recurrence and 74%(80/108) resolved signs/symptoms of infection. ERV was selected primarily for consolidation of the regimen(40%). Eight patients experienced a probable ERV-related adverse event, mainly gastrointestinal(87.5%) and none experienced clostridium difficile. Conclusion 30-day survival was achieved in the majority of patients treated with ERV. Studies with longer follow-up are required to confirm these findings. Disclosures Madeline King, PharmD, Tetraphase (Speaker’s Bureau) Bruce M. Jones, PharmD, BCPS, ALK-Abello (Research Grant or Support)Allergan/Abbvie (Speaker’s Bureau) Michael J. Rybak, PharmD, MPH, PhD, Paratek (Grant/Research Support)
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.