Background
Tracheal extubation is the process of removing a tube from the trachea. It is associated with an increase in heart rate, blood pressure, intracranial pressure, intraocular pressure, coughing, bronchospasm, laryngospasm, and bleeding. Many techniques, as well as drugs, have been attempted for attenuation of the airway and cardiovascular responses. Propofol and lidocaine are widely available drugs in resource-limited settings even though their relative effectiveness for smooth extubation is not well established.
Objectives
To assess the effectiveness of intravenous lidocaine and propofol on the attenuation of extubation-induced hemodynamic responses in the adult elective surgical patient from November 01, 2019, to February 30, 2020, at Asella teaching and referral hospital, Ethiopia.
Methods
Institutional-based prospective observational cohort study design was conducted on 72 ASA I patients who underwent elective surgery. The study participants were allocated into three groups equally based on anesthetists' extubation plan; Group P, 0.5 mg/kg propofol, group L, 1.5 mg/kg lidocaine administered 2 min before extubation and group C was a control group. Data were analyzed by SPSS version 20 after the normality of the data was checked by the Shapiro Wilk test. One-way ANOVA followed by a Tukey posthoc test has been employed to find the pair-wise significance and a p-value of <0.05 was considered as statistically significant.
Results
A demographic status and clinical characteristics of the patient were comparable between groups with p-values of >0.05. After extubation; heart rate, systolic, diastolic, and mean arterial blood pressure were decreased significantly in groups of propofol and lidocaine within 10 min. Propofol shows better results in maintaining stable systolic blood pressure up to 3 min, while heart rate, diastolic, and mean arterial pressure were maintained stable up to 5 min after extubation (p = 0.001).
Conclusions
0.5 mg/kg propofol or 1.5 mg/kg lidocaine might help to attenuate extubation induced hemodynamic responses.
Background
During transverses abdominal plane block (TAP) procedure to provide analgesia in cesarean section (CS) operation, the use of perineural dexamethasone as an additive agent may improve pain relief and may cause a prolonged block duration. This study aims to investigate whether perineural dexamethasone, when added to bupivacaine local anesthetic agent during a TAP block, may provide adequate pain relief without adverse events.
Methods
This is a prospective cohort study of fifty-eight patients undergoing elective CS with spinal anesthesia. We hypothesized to perform bilateral TAP block using perineural dexamethasone as an additive agent. The patients were randomly divided into two groups using a systematic random sampling method. While one group of patients received perineural dexamethasone of 8 mg additive agent together with bupivacaine 0.25% 40 ml (Group TAPD), the other group received only bupivacaine 0.25% 40 ml in TAP block (Group TAPA). The primary outcomes are the period for the first request of postoperative pain relief medication and the numerical rating scale (NRS) pain intensity scores at 2, 6, 12, and 24 h after surgery. The secondary outcomes are comparing the 24-h tramadol and diclofenac analgesic requirements and the incidences of side effects on postoperative day one. A p-value of < 0.05 is statistically significant.
Results
The time to first analgesic request was 8.5 h (8.39–9.79) in the TAPD group versus 5.3 h (5.23–5.59) in the TAPA group, respectively. (p < 0.001) The median NRS scores were significantly reduced in the TAPD group compared to the TAPA group at 6, 12, and 24 h after surgery (p-values < 0.001). The total analgesics consumption over 24 h postoperatively was lower in Group TAPD compared to Group TAPA (p < 0.05).
Conclusion
An additive agent of perineural dexamethasone at a dose of 8 mg during bilateral TAP block for elective CS operation under spinal anesthesia provided better pain relief on postoperative day 1.
Background:
Spinal anesthesia induced hypotension and bradycardia are common and hazardous in elderly patients. Many techniques are being tried to prevent and treat these problems even if there is a controversy. The effects of prophylactic atropine on prevention of spinal anesthesia induced hypotension and bradycardia in geriatrics for urologic surgeries are not well-established.
Objective:
To assess the effects of prophylactic atropine in prevention of spinal anesthesia induced hypotension and bradycardia in geriatrics undergoing urological surgeries at a resource limited setting in Central Ethiopia from December 1, 2017 to February 28, 2018 G C.
Methods:
This is a prospective cohort study that recruits 76 patients who underwent elective urological surgeries. Independent t-test and Manny Whitney tests were used for numeric data while Chi-Square or Fisher exact test was used for categorical variables. P-values < 0.05 were considered as statistically significant.
Results:
There was no significant difference in baseline heart rate, mean arterial pressure, type & duration of surgery and total fluid administrations. There was a statistically significant difference in mean heart rate and mean arterial pressure at different times of measurement between the exposed and un-exposed groups. Total 1 h vasopressor consumption was minimal in the exposed group (P = 0.038).
Conclusion:
Prophylactic atropine with in 1 min of induction of spinal anesthesia in elderly patients undergoing urological surgery might reduce the incidence of hypotension and bradycardia.
Highlights:
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.