The N- and C-terminal junctions of the third intracellular loop (i3) of G protein-coupled receptors play a role in the coupling process. We had previously constructed two triple point alanine mutants of the i3 junction of the muscarinic Hm1 receptor, W209A/I211A/Y212A and E360A/K362A/T366A, which are defective in mediating carbachol stimulation of phosphatidylinositol (PI) turnover (Moro, O., Lameh, J., Högger, P., and Sadée, W. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 22273-22276). Each of the corresponding six single point mutations were constructed to determine residues crucial to receptor coupling. Mutants W209A and T366A were similar to or only slightly less effective than wild type Hm1 in stimulating PI turnover. In the N-terminal junction, I211A and Y212A were defective in coupling, and I211A was even more defective than the corresponding triple mutant. Therefore, the triple mutation compensated at least partially for the effect of these two single point mutations. In the C-terminal i3 loop junction, mutant K362A was again more strongly defective than the corresponding triple mutant. In contrast, mutation E360A was found to be activating, leading to elevated PI turnover in the absence of agonist and sensitization toward carbachol activation. Activating mutations in the C-terminal i3 loop junction have been reported previously for the adrenergic receptors, but E360A represents the first muscarinic receptor with substantial basal activity. The effects of the single point mutations observed in this study were not readily predictable from similar mutations from closely related G protein-coupled receptors despite sequence conservation in the i3 loop junctions. Our results caution against defining precise coupling domains in these regions by mutagenesis results.
Human m1 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor mutants were screened to determine receptor domains and cellular pathways relevant to down‐regulation. Mutations in the second intracellular loop and the junctions of the third intracellular loop of the receptor, where a role for receptor activation or internalization had been previously demonstrated in HEK293 cells, were selected for this study. To assess receptor down‐regulation, the m1 receptor mutants were transfected into Chinese hamster ovary cells. Because receptor internalization is expected to precede down‐regulation, mutants displaying intact internalization were selected to permit interpretation of mutational effects on down‐regulation alone. Four mutations were identified that specifically impaired down‐regulation without altering receptor internalization: V127A, I211A, E360A, and K362A. The results define new receptor domains in the second intracellular loop and the junctions of the third intracellular loop that are involved in down‐regulation. These same four mutants were also defective in signaling via the phospholipase C and the adenylyl cyclase pathways and in G protein activation, as measured by [35S]GTPγS binding. However, the level of second messenger stimulation correlated poorly with the extent of down‐regulation. In summary, several mutations of the m1 receptor selectively affect down‐regulation, demonstrating that internalization and down‐regulation represent distinct events driven by different cellular mechanisms.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.