As PSMA-targeted PET is expected to be evaluated in larger prospective trials, the dissemination of potential diagnostic pitfalls and the biologic underpinning of those findings will be of increased importance.

Positron emission tomography (PET) is a powerful, quantitative imaging modality that has been used for decades to noninvasively investigate cardiovascular biology and physiology. Due to limited availability, methodologic complexity, and high costs, it has long been seen as a research tool and as a reference method for validation of other diagnostic approaches. This perception, fortunately, has changed significantly within recent years. Increasing diversity of therapeutic options for coronary artery disease, and increasing specificity of novel therapies for certain biologic pathways, has resulted in a clinical need for more accurate and specific diagnostic techniques. At the same time, the number of PET centers continues to grow, stimulated by PET's success in oncology. Methodologic advances as well as improved radiotracer availability have further contributed to more widespread use. Evidence for diagnostic and prognostic usefulness of myocardial perfusion and viability assessment by PET is increasing. Some studies suggest overall cost-effectiveness of the technique despite higher costs of a single study, because unnecessary follow-up procedures can be avoided. The advent of hybrid PET-computed tomography (CT), which enables integration of PET-derived biologic information with multislice CT-derived morphologic information, and the key role of PET in the development and translation of novel molecular-targeted imaging compounds, have further contributed to more widespread acceptance. Today, PET promises to play a leading diagnostic role on the pathway toward a future of high-powered, comprehensive, personalized, cardiovascular medicine. This review summarizes the state-of-the-art in current imaging methodology and clinical application, and outlines novel developments and future directions.

Objective:To compare the rate of abnormal brain metabolism by FDG-PET/CT to other paraclinical findings and to describe brain metabolism patterns in autoimmune encephalitis (AE).Methods:A retrospective review of clinical data and initial dedicated brain FDG-PET/CT studies for neurology inpatients with AE, per consensus criteria, treated at a single tertiary center over 123 months. Z-score maps of FDG-PET/CT were made using 3-dimensional stereotactic surface projections with comparison to age group–matched controls. Brain region mean Z-scores with magnitudes ≥2.00 were interpreted as significant. Comparisons were made to rates of abnormal initial brain MRI, abnormal initial EEG, and presence of intrathecal inflammation.Results:Sixty-one patients with AE (32 seropositive) underwent brain FDG-PET/CT at median 4 weeks of symptoms (interquartile range [IQR] 9 weeks) and median 4 days from MRI (IQR 8.5 days). FDG-PET/CT was abnormal in 52 (85%) patients, with 42 (69%) demonstrating only hypometabolism. Isolated hypermetabolism was demonstrated in 2 (3%) patients. Both hypermetabolic and hypometabolic brain regions were noted in 8 (13%) patients. Nine (15%) patients had normal FDG-PET/CT studies. CSF inflammation was evident in 34/55 (62%) patients, whereas initial EEG (17/56, 30%) and MRI (23/57, 40%) were abnormal in fewer. Detection of 2 or more of these paraclinical findings was in weak agreement with abnormal brain FDG-PET/CT (κ = 0.16, p = 0.02).Conclusions:FDG-PET/CT was more often abnormal than initial EEG, MRI, and CSF studies in neurology inpatients with AE, with brain region hypometabolism the most frequently observed.

Current noninvasive tests for coronary artery disease detect atherosclerosis or regional ischemia. Global myocardial flow reserve is not routinely identified, although it may be an additional marker of disease development and progression. Methods: For the clinical work-up of suspected or known stable coronary artery disease, 275 individuals had undergone rest-dipyridamole 82 Rb myocardial perfusion imaging using PET. In addition to clinical measures of regional perfusion and function, an experimentally validated approach to quantify global myocardial flow reserve was used. Follow-up was obtained for 362 6 277 d. Results: Myocardial blood flow and flow reserve showed significant correlation to systemic and cardiac hemodynamics and a weak association with risk factors such as age and history of hyperlipidemia. Flow reserve was expectedly lower in subjects with regional ischemia (1.70 6 0.65 vs. 2.31 6 0.97 in those without; P , 0.0001), but a wide range was observed in those without regional perfusion abnormalities. We used a composite endpoint of hard and soft events to determine that flow reserve below the median was predictive of adverse outcome in the overall population (P 5 0.001) and in subjects with normal regional perfusion (n 5 178; P 5 0.036), whereas stress flow was predictive only in the overall population (P 5 0.001). Ageadjusted multivariate analysis confirmed regional perfusion defects (relative hazard, 2.51; 95% confidence interval, 1.24-5.10; P 5 0.009) and low global flow reserve (relative hazard, 2.93; 95% confidence interval, 1.30-6.65; P 5 0.011) as independent predictors of cardiac events. Conclusion: In clinical cardiac 82 Rb PET, globally impaired flow reserve is a relevant marker for predicting short-term cardiovascular events. It may be used for integration with currently established functional and morphologic test results and for guidance of preventive measures, especially in the absence of regional flow-limiting disease.