Background: Several studies have outlined biological differences between female and male breast cancer (MBC) and concluded that MBC should be considered as an entirely separate disease. Whether FOXM1 has any indication for prognosis in MBC patients remains unknown. We sought to examine the expression levels of FOXM1 in MBC and to identify the relationship between FOXM1 expression and patient survival. Patients and Methods: FOXM1 expression was evaluated in a total of 130 MBC specimens. Results: FOXM1 was overexpressed in 37% of the MBC samples. FOXM1 overexpression was significantly associated with tumor size (p = 0.045), histological grade (p = 0.048), lymph node metastasis (p = 0.012), Ki-67 proliferation index (p = 0.016), and molecular subtypes (p < 0.001). Multivariate analyses indicated that FOXM1 was an independent prognostic factor for overall survival in MBC patients (p < 0.001, hazard ratio = 0.69 (0.43-0.96)). Conclusions: Overexpression of FOXM1 was associated with well-established markers of poor prognosis; thus FOXM1 may represent a potential novel prognostic marker for MBC.
FOXM1 may have a reliable predictive significance in male breast cancer and thus may become an important target for male breast cancer therapy in the near future.
A new case of epithelioid hemangioendothelioma is reported to have occurred to a 67-year-old patient who consulted for right-sided chest pain. The work-up showed multiple right pulmonary lesions associated with bilateral moderate pleural effusion and left-sided pleural thickening and three hypodense nodules in the right lobe of the liver, peritoneal thickening, ascites, and multiple vertebral lytic lesions. The diagnosis of an epithelioid hemangioendothelioma was concluded through a histological examination of a computed tomography scan guided biopsy of the liver. The patient received a primary mono-chemotherapy with Adriamycin (75 mg/m2 every three weeks) and intravenous bisphosphonates without response and general status impairment. The patient died after 16 months of follow-up.
Objective: To assess the response rate of patients with rectal adenocarcinoma to neoadjuvant therapy and to identify the predictors of histological regression after neoadjuvant radiotherapy (RT) or concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT). Methods: This study recruited 64 patients. The patients had resectable cancer of the lower and the middle rectum (T3/T4 and/or N+) without distant metastasis and received neoadjuvant RT or CCRT followed by radical surgery with total mesorectal excision (TME) between January 2006 and December 2011. The patients were classified into non-response (NR), partial response (PR), and pathologic complete response (pCR) based on the Dworak tumor regression grading system.Results: The median age of patients was 57 years (ranging from 22 to 85). A total of 24 patients were treated with neoadjuvant CCRT, whereas 40 patients were treated with RT alone. Abdominoperineal resection (APR) was performed on 29 patients (45%). Anterior resection with TME was performed on 34 patients (53%). One patient had local resection. Histologically, 12 (19%), 24 (73%), and 28 (44%) patients exhibited pCR, PR, and NR, respectively. Univariate analysis revealed that the predictors of tumor regression were as follows: the absence of lymph node involvement from initial imaging (cN0) (P=0.021); normal initial carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level (P=0.01); hemoglobin level ≥12 g/dl (P=0.009); CCRT (P=0.021); and tumor downstaging in imaging (P=0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that the main predictors of pCR were CT combined with neoadjuvant RT, cN0 stage, and tumor regression on imaging.
Conclusions: Identifying the predictors of pCR following neoadjuvant therapy aids the selection of responsive patients for non-aggressive surgical treatment and possible surveillance.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.