Wars of attrition are often characterized by negotiations and concessions occurring in conflicts, such as peace attempts or ceasefires. The present paper introduces a round of concessions into standard war of attrition models and focuses on a debt stabilization game. Concessions granted by each player in the pre-stabilization period are modeled as an agreement to pay additional taxes with the aim of reducing government deficits and public debt. We compute the symmetric Bayesian-Nash equilibrium and show that concessions prolong the attrition warfare rather than quickly generating a peace period. Thus, concession forms a strategic variable for every player to control and delay the end of the war. Furthermore, we establish that the war-ending outcome, namely debt stabilization, is more delayed under a coalition government than under a single-party government. Finally, this paper contributes to explain failures of austerity measures in public debt stabilization.
A reputation of competence in solving a particular problem is useful only if the problem remains in the future. Hence, there is an incentive to keep the "enemy" alive: an agent may do wrong in his or her job precisely because he or she is competent. The paper develops this mechanism in a general career concerns framework and shows that a tradeoff between reputation and the need for enemies emerges. As a result, agents are induced to produce only moderate effort, and only moderately skilled agents are likely to be appointed. Implications of the analysis are discussed in a multitasking environment with incomplete transparency. Some evidence in principal-agent relationships and the political arena is presented to illustrate our theory.
Few studies have focused specifically on the physiocratic analysis of money. The physiocrats' position was based on their criticism of Law's system and more broadly on the role of finance. First, they rejected the idea that a large amount of money was the condition for the wealth of nations. Second, they rejected paper money, as well as any form of currency alteration. As a simple means of exchange, Quesnay and his followers recognized that money could be replaced by paper. However, in order to comply with the “value for equal value” principle of exchange, money had to be made of precious metals, as Le Trosne, the main architect of the physiocratic monetary doctrine, forcefully asserted. This doctrine of money created a tension: from the circulation perspective, money was not considered as a component of wealth and could be replaced by paper to simply represent flows in expenditure; but from the equality-of-exchange perspective, money had to be made of precious metals, thus becoming a storable asset in a portfolio. To overcome this tension, the économistes were to forcefully denounce hoarding and deny money the function of a store of value.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.