Through its interaction with the 5= translation initiation factor eIF4G, poly(A) binding protein (PABP) facilitates the translation of 5=-capped and 3=-poly(A)-tailed mRNAs. Rotavirus mRNAs are capped but not polyadenylated, instead terminating in a 3= GACC motif that is recognized by the viral protein NSP3, which competes with PABP for eIF4G binding. Upon rotavirus infection, viral, GACC-tailed mRNAs are efficiently translated, while host poly(A)-tailed mRNA translation is, in contrast, severely impaired. To explore the roles of NSP3 in these two opposing events, the translational capabilities of three capped mRNAs, distinguished by either a GACC, a poly(A), or a non-GACC and nonpoly(A) 3= end, have been monitored after electroporation of cells expressing all rotavirus proteins (infected cells) or only NSP3 (stably or transiently transfected cells). In infected cells, we found that the magnitudes of translation induction (GACC-tailed mRNA) and translation reduction [poly(A)-tailed mRNA] both depended on the rotavirus strain used but that translation reduction not genetically linked to NSP3. In transfected cells, even a small amount of NSP3 was sufficient to dramatically enhance GACC-tailed mRNA translation and, surprisingly, to slightly favor the translation of both poly(A)-and nonpoly(A)-tailed mRNAs, likely by stabilizing the eIF4E-eIF4G interaction. These data suggest that NSP3 is a translational surrogate of the PABP-poly(A) complex; therefore, it cannot by itself be responsible for inhibiting the translation of host poly(A)-tailed mRNAs upon rotavirus infection. IMPORTANCETo control host cell physiology and to circumvent innate immunity, many viruses have evolved powerful mechanisms aimed at inhibiting host mRNA translation while stimulating translation of their own mRNAs. How rotavirus tackles this challenge is still a matter of debate. Using rotavirus-infected cells, we show that the magnitude of cellular poly(A) mRNA translation differs with respect to rotavirus strains but is not genetically linked to NSP3. Using cells expressing rotavirus NSP3, we show that NSP3 alone not only dramatically enhances rotavirus-like mRNA translation but also enhances poly(A) mRNA translation rather than inhibiting it, likely by stabilizing the eIF4E-eIF4G complex. Thus, the inhibition of cellular polyadenylated mRNA translation during rotavirus infection cannot be attributed solely to NSP3 and is more likely the result of global competition between viral and host mRNAs for the cellular translation machinery. W hen delivered into or synthesized by the host cell, viral mRNAs compete with cellular mRNAs already present in the cytoplasm for access to the protein synthesis machinery. Recruitment of the 40S ribosomal subunit onto mRNA (translation initiation) is the rate-limiting and most controlled step of eukaryotic protein biosynthesis; hence, it is highly competitive for both cellular and viral mRNAs. The 5= cap and 3= poly(A) tail of most cellular mRNAs are joined by a protein complex containing the cap binding pr...

Rotavirus NSP3 is a translational surrogate of the PABP-poly(A) complex for rotavirus mRNAs. To further explore the effects of NSP3 and untranslated regions (UTRs) on rotavirus mRNAs translation, we used a quantitative in vivo assay with simultaneous cytoplasmic NSP3 expression (wild-type or deletion mutant) and electroporated rotavirus-like and standard synthetic mRNAs. This assay shows that the last four GACC nucleotides of viral mRNA are essential for efficient translation and that both the NSP3 eIF4G- and RNA-binding domains are required. We also show efficient translation of rotavirus-like mRNAs even with a 5’UTR as short as 5 nucleotides, while more than eleven nucleotides are required for the 3’UTR. Despite the weak requirement for a long 5’UTR, a good AUG environment remains a requirement for rotavirus mRNAs translation.

XBP1 is a stress-regulated transcription factor also involved in mammalian host defenses and innate immune response. Our investigation of XBP1 RNA splicing during rotavirus infection revealed that an additional XBP1 RNA (XBP1es) that corresponded to exon skipping in the XBP1 pre-RNA is induced depending on the rotavirus strain used. We show that the translation product of XBP1es (XBP1es) has trans-activation properties similar to those of XBP1 on ER stress response element (ERSE) containing promoters. Using monoreassortant between ES+ (“skipping”) and ES– (“nonskipping”) strains of rotavirus, we show that gene 7 encoding the viral translation enhancer NSP3 is involved in this phenomenon and that exon skipping parallels the nuclear relocalization of cytoplasmic PABP. We further show, using recombinant rotaviruses carrying chimeric gene 7, that the ES+ phenotype is linked to the eIF4G-binding domain of NSP3. Because the XBP1 transcription factor is involved in stress and immunological responses, our results suggest an alternative way to activate XBP1 upon viral infection or nuclear localization of PABP. IMPORTANCE Rotavirus is one of the most important pathogens causing severe gastroenteritis in young children worldwide. Here we show that infection with several rotavirus strains induces an alternative splicing of the RNA encoding the stressed-induced transcription factor XBP1. The genetic determinant of XBP1 splicing is the viral RNA translation enhancer NSP3. Since XBP1 is involved in cellular stress and immune responses and since the XBP1 protein made from the alternatively spliced RNA is an active transcription factor, our observations raise the question of whether alternative splicing is a cellular response to rotavirus infection.

No abstract