The Shoal Bass Micropterus cataractae is a fluvial specialist endemic to the Apalachicola River drainage in Alabama, Florida, and Georgia that has experienced declines throughout much of its range. The Flint River, Georgia, represents the largest remaining intact ecosystem for Shoal Bass in their native range. Spotted Bass M. punctulatus have recently been introduced into this system, causing concern about the potential negative impacts the species may have on the native populations of Shoal Bass and Largemouth Bass M. salmoides. To assess the symmetry and strength of competition and gain the greatest perspective on the interrelationships among these sympatric, congeneric species, we compared the movement patterns and habitat use of all three species of black bass present in this system. Fifteen Shoal Bass, 10 Largemouth Bass, and 6 Spotted Bass were implanted with radio transmitters in the Flint River and tracked for a period of 1 year (2008). Daily and hourly movements did not vary among species or season, though individuals of each species were observed moving >5 km to shoal complexes during spring. Habitat overlap varied between species during the study; overlap was highest between Spotted Bass and Largemouth Bass, intermediate between Spotted Bass and Shoal Bass, and lowest between Shoal Bass and Largemouth Bass. Shoal Bass tended to select coarse rocky habitat, while Largemouth Bass tended to select depositional habitat. Spotted Bass exhibited the widest niche breadth and generally used habitat in proportion to its availability. Use of similar habitats by these three species during the spring spawning period highlights the potential risk of genetic introgression of the two native species by introduced Spotted Bass. Physical barriers that restrict access to habitat during long‐distance seasonal movements, as observed for several Shoal Bass in this study, may negatively impact populations of this species. Received March 31, 2012; accepted October 12, 2012
We examined the influence of variable discharge on hatching and age-0 growth for fluvial specialist and habitat generalist species of black bass Micropterus spp. in two southeastern U.S. rivers, the Flint River, Georgia (unregulated), and the Tallapoosa River, Alabama (regulated by several hydropower dams). Between 2008 and 2010, we collected 285 Largemouth Bass M. salmoides (generalist) and 254 Shoal Bass M. cataractae (specialist) from two reaches of the Flint River. In 2010–2011, we collected 309 Alabama Bass M. henshalli (generalist) and 216 Redeye Bass M. coosae (specialist) from two regulated reaches and one unregulated reach of the Tallapoosa River. Successful hatching of black bass in both rivers generally occurred from late March to early June when water levels were low and stable. Hatching distributions of all black bass were generally unimodal with little evidence of spawning disruption, except for Alabama Bass in the most-regulated reach of the Tallapoosa River, which appeared to be disrupted by large discharge events. Mean growth of both species in the Flint River varied from 0.64 to 0.82 mm/d across reaches and years; Shoal Bass generally grew faster than Largemouth Bass in all reach–year combinations. Largemouth Bass growth was inversely correlated to discharge variation in one reach, but Shoal Bass growth was not correlated to discharge variation in either reach. Alabama Bass and Redeye Bass growth rates in the Tallapoosa River were similar to rates observed for congeners in the Flint River; Alabama Bass grew faster than Redeye Bass. Growth of both species was inversely related to discharge variation in five of six reach–species combinations; the only exception was for Redeye Bass in the less-regulated reach. Results from this study suggest that variable discharge has less influence on successful reproduction of black bass than was reported for other fishes, but growth may be more affected by discharges resulting from anthropogenic sources than those associated with the natural regime.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.