Alterations in cortical excitability are implicated in the pathophysiology of migraine. However, the relationship between cortical spreading depression (CSD) and headache has not been fully elucidated. We aimed to identify the corticofugal networks that directly influence meningeal nociception in the brainstem trigeminocervical complex (Sp5C) of the rat. Cortical areas projecting to the brainstem were first identified by retrograde tracing from Sp5C areas that receive direct meningeal inputs. Anterograde tracers were then injected into these cortical areas to determine the precise pattern of descending axonal terminal fields in the Sp5C. Descending cortical projections to brainstem areas innervated by the ophthalmic branch of the trigeminal nerve originate contralaterally from insular (Ins) and primary somatosensory (S1) cortices and terminate in laminae I-II and III-V of the Sp5C, respectively. In another set of experiments, electrophysiological recordings were simultaneously performed in Ins, S1 or primary visual cortex (V1), and Sp5C neurons. KCl was microinjected into such cortical areas to test the effects of CSD on meningeal nociception. CSD initiated in Ins and S1 induced facilitation and inhibition of meningeal-evoked responses, respectively. CSD triggered in V1 affects differently Ins and S1 cortices, enhancing or inhibiting meningeal-evoked responses of Sp5C, without affecting cutaneous-evoked nociceptive responses. Our data suggest that "top-down" influences from lateralized areas within Ins and S1 selectively affect interoceptive (meningeal) over exteroceptive (cutaneous) nociceptive inputs onto Sp5C. Such corticofugal influences could contribute to the development of migraine pain in terms of both topographic localization and pain tuning during an attack.

In the thalamus, noradrenergic output from the pontine nucleus locus coeruleus (LC) may actively shape the response properties of various sensory networks en route to the cortex. Little is known, however, about the involvement of ascending noradrenergic innervation of the somatosensory thalamus in the processing of nociceptive information. To address this question, we combined the study of Fos expression upon nociceptive tooth pulp stimulation in the anaesthetized rat, with the detection of retrogradely traced neurones from the somatosensory thalamus. Cell bodies labelled retrogradely from the left thalamus were observed on both sides of the LC, with an ipsilateral predominance (n = 8). Electrical stimulation of the right incisor pulp (n = 4) provoked a significantly stronger Fos expression (around twice) than sham surgery (n = 4), in both the ipsi-and contralateral LC. Significantly larger numbers of double labelled neurones were counted in the LC of tooth-pulp-stimulated animals (representing around 30% of retrogradely labelled cells in LC) than in the LC of sham animals. They were found bilaterally, but with a clear, significant, ipsilateral (i.e. left) predominance. The present data offer an anatomical framework to understand how the LC is involved in the sensory processing of nociceptive information in the thalamus. For the first time, it is shown that nociceptive stimulation activates LC neurones projecting to the somatosensory thalamus. This suggests a new role for LC in modulating nociception within the thalamus.

Recent evidence has been accumulated that not only spinal trigeminal nucleus caudalis (Sp5C) neurons but also spinal trigeminal nucleus oralis (Sp5O) neurons respond to noxious stimuli. It is unknown, however, whether Sp5O neurons project to supratrigeminal structures implicated in the sensory processing of orofacial nociceptive information. This study used retrograde tracing with Fluorogold in rats to investigate and compare the projections from the Sp5O and Sp5C to two major thalamic nuclei that relay ascending somatosensory information to the primary somatic sensory cortex: the ventroposteromedial thalamic nucleus (VPM) and the posterior thalamic nuclear group (Po). Results not only confirmed the existence of contralateral projections from the Sp5C to the VPM and Po, with retrogradely labelled neurons displaying a specific distribution in laminae I, III and V, they also showed consistent and similar numbers of retrogradely labelled cell bodies in the contralateral Sp5O. In addition, a topographic distribution of VPM projections from Sp5C and Sp5O was found: neurons in the dorsomedial parts of Sp5O and Sp5C projected to the medial VPM, neurons in the ventrolateral Sp5O and Sp5C projected to the lateral VPM, and neurons in intermediate parts of Sp5O and Sp5C projected to the intermediate VPM. All together, these data suggest that not only the Sp5C, but also the Sp5O relay somatosensory orofacial information from the brainstem to the thalamus. Furthermore, trigemino-VPM pathways conserve the somatotopic distribution of primary afferents found in each subnucleus. These results thus improve our understanding of trigeminal somatosensory processing and help to direct future electrophysiological investigations.

No abstract