The existence of facial aftereffects suggests that shape-selective mechanisms at the higher stages of visual object coding -- similarly to the early processing of low-level visual features -- are adaptively recalibrated. Our goal was to uncover the ERP correlates of shape-selective adaptation and to test whether it is also involved in the visual processing of human body parts. We found that prolonged adaptation to female hands -- similarly to adaptation to female faces -- biased the judgements about the subsequently presented hand test stimuli: they were perceived more masculine than in the control conditions. We also showed that these hand aftereffects are size and orientation invariant. However, no aftereffects were found when the adaptor and test stimuli belonged to different categories (i.e. face adaptor and hand test, or vice versa), suggesting that the underlying adaptation mechanisms are category-specific. In accordance with the behavioral results, both adaptation to faces and hands resulted in a strong and category-specific modulation -- reduced amplitude and increased latency -- of the N170 component of ERP responses. Our findings suggest that shape-selective adaptation is a general mechanism of visual object processing and its neural effects are primarily reflected in the N170 component of the ERP responses.

Adaptation processes in human early visual cortical areas are sensitive to the exposure time of the adaptor stimulus. Here we investigated the effect of adaptation duration at the higher, shape-specific stages of visual processing using facial adaptation. It was found that long-term (5s) adaptation evokes facial aftereffects consisting of a position invariant as well as a position-specific component. As a result of adaptation to a female face, test faces were judged more masculine when they were displayed in the same location as the female adaptor face, as compared to that when they were presented in the opposite visual hemifield. However, aftereffects evoked by short-term (500 ms) adaptation were found to be entirely position invariant. In accordance with these behavioral results, we found that the adaptation effects, measured on the amplitude of the N170 ERP component consisted of a position-specific component only after long-term, but not after short-term adaptation conditions. These results suggest that both short and long exposure to a face stimulus leads to adaptation of position invariant face-selective processes, whereas adaptation of position-specific neural mechanisms of face processing requires long-term adaptation. Our findings imply that manipulating adaptation duration provides an opportunity to specifically adapt different neural processes of shape-specific coding and to investigate their stimulus selectivity.

We investigated the representation of objects' position at the higher, shape-selective stages of visual processing by testing the position-specificity of the behavioural and neural effects of facial adaptation. Here, we show that facial after-effects evoked by adaptation to both upright and upside-down faces are significantly larger when the adaptor and test faces are presented on the same retinal position than when they are displayed in different hemifields. Our event-related potential recordings revealed that adaptation effects measured on the amplitude of the N170 event-related potential component over the hemisphere that was contralateral to the test face stimulus also show strong position-specificity. These findings suggest that face adaptation effects are only partially translation invariant and facial after-effects measured with peripheral test stimuli primarily reflect the adaptation processes in the contralateral hemisphere.

No abstract

It has been shown that prolonged exposure to a human face leads to shape-selective visual aftereffects. It seems that these face-specific aftereffects (FAEs) have multiple components, related to the adaptation of earlier and higher level processing of visual stimuli. The largest magnitude of FAE, using long-term adaptation periods, is usually observed at the retinotopic position of the preceding adaptor stimulus. However, FAE is also detected, to a smaller degree, at other retinal positions in a spatially invariant way and this component depends less on the adaptation duration. Several lines of evidences suggest that while the position-specific FAE involves lower level areas of the ventral processing stream, the position-invariant FAE depends on the activation of higher level face-processing areas and the fusiform gyrus in particular. In the present paper, we summarize the available behavioural, electrophysiological and neuroimaging results regarding the spatial selectivity of FAE and discuss their implications for the visual stability of object representations across saccadic eye movements.