Protein deposition in Iberian pigs is low and the reasons for this are unknown. We investigated differences in protein synthesis rate in tissues of 30 Iberian and Landrace gilts fed 2 diets with adequate amino acid composition containing 160 or 120 g crude protein (CP)/kg, or a lysine-deficient diet (containing 120 or 160 g CP/kg for Iberian and Landrace pigs, respectively). Pigs were infused with a flooding dose of phenylalanine (15% as [(2)H(5)]-phenylalanine). Blood samples were taken from 12 to 40 min after the start of infusion, and samples from longissimus dorsi (ld), biceps femoris (bf), and semimembranosus (sm) muscles, liver, and duodenum were taken after slaughter. Body weights (BW) were 22.9 +/- 0.37 and 27.1 +/- 0.64 kg for Iberian and Landrace pigs, respectively. Iberian pigs fed the adequate diets had higher muscle fractional protein synthesis rates (FSR, %/d) than Landrace pigs. The FSR were 7.9 +/- 0.34 vs. 6.3 +/- 0.29%/d; 8.3 +/- 0.36 vs. 6.3 +/- 0.21%/d, and 7.7 +/- 0.23 vs. 6.4 +/- 0.36%/d for ld, bf, and sm muscles in Iberian and Landrace breeds, respectively (P < 0.01). However, muscles were between 20 and 32% smaller in the Iberian pigs (P < 0.01). Dietary protein level did not affect muscle FSR or size in either breed. Lysine deficiency reduced muscle FSR (46-49%, P < 0.001). Visceral tissues had greater relative weights in Iberian pigs (P < 0.001) with no breed differences in FSR. These findings might explain the low efficiency of protein and energy utilization by Iberian pigs compared with conventional pig breeds.
The capacity for protein deposition in Iberian pigs is lower than in modern (e.g., Landrace) pig breeds, and the reasons for this remain unknown. The hypothesis tested in this work is that under similar nutritional and physiological conditions, whole-body protein turnover as well as the protein synthesis to protein deposition ratio differs between Iberian and Landrace breeds, resulting in dissimilar protein deposition rates. As a main objective, these variables were compared at different protein and Lys intakes in growing gilts. The study examined the effect of Lys deficiency because this is the prevalent condition during the fattening period of the Iberian pig in the Mediterranean forest, where the main feed source is oak acorn, which provides approximately one-third of the available Lys present in an ideal protein. Three diets were tested within each breed: 2 diets with an optimal essential AA pattern, containing 12 or 16% CP as-fed, or a Lys-deficient diet (35% of the recommended Lys content). This diet was supplied at 12% CP for the Iberian and 16% CP for the Landrace pigs, respectively. The contrasts made were breed x dietary protein concentration and breed x AA pattern (adequate vs. inadequate Lys content). Cumulative urinary (15)N excretion over 60 h after receiving an oral dose of [(15)N]-glycine was used to calculate N flux. Mean BW for Landrace and Iberian pigs were 25.8 +/- 0.55 kg and 30.8 +/- 0.74 kg, respectively. Protein deposition (g of N/(kg(0.75).d) was lower in the Iberian than in the Landrace gilts (4 to 16%; P = 0.002) and increased with dietary protein content. In contrast, protein synthesis and degradation [g of N/(kg(0.75).d)] were greater for the Landrace breed (16 to 18 and 23%, respectively, for the 2 dietary protein contents studied; P < 0.05), but no breed differences were detected in fractional protein synthesis and degradation rates. The ratio of protein synthesis:protein deposition (S/PD) did not change with dietary protein concentration or breed and achieved a mean value of 5.4. Irrespective of breed, Lys deficiency had a strong negative effect on N balance (P < 0.001) and increased the ratio of S/PD (P = 0.012). The greater rates of protein deposition, synthesis, and degradation in Landrace pigs than in Iberian pigs fed optimal AA-pattern diets were then attributed to differences in body protein mass. Consequently, these results validate the hypothesis of unequal synthesis and degradation, but not of unequal S/PD, between breeds.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.