Medicine is a rapidly-evolving discipline, with progress picking up pace with each passing decade. This constant evolution results in the introduction of new tools and methods, which in turn occasionally leads to paradigm shifts across the affected medical fields. The following review attempts to showcase how 3D printing has begun to reshape and improve processes across various medical specialties and where it has the potential to make a significant impact. The current state-of-the-art, as well as real-life clinical applications of 3D printing, are reflected in the perspectives of specialists practicing in the selected disciplines, with a focus on pre-procedural planning, simulation (rehearsal) of non-routine procedures, and on medical education and training. A review of the latest multidisciplinary literature on the subject offers a general summary of the advances enabled by 3D printing. Numerous advantages and applications were found, such as gaining better insight into patient-specific anatomy, better pre-operative planning, mock simulated surgeries, simulation-based training and education, development of surgical guides and other tools, patient-specific implants, bioprinted organs or structures, and counseling of patients. It was evident that pre-procedural planning and rehearsing of unusual or difficult procedures and training of medical professionals in these procedures are extremely useful and transformative.

Three-dimensional printing (3Dp) employs a process of placing layers upon layers of material to create a physical object based on a digitally designed model [1]. The process (workflow) of making 3D models involves data acquisition from 2D images, virtual reconstruction and physical printing [1]. 3Dp models are sought as an effective means for educating not only medical students, but also physicians, residents, nurses and other healthcare providers, as well as an aid in planning and training (simulating) procedures [2-8]. Having had

Despite easy access to imaging diagnostic procedures and an abundance of spatial data, most cardiac interventions are still performed under two‐dimensional fluoroscopy. Incorporating anatomical data from scans into procedures plans has the potential to improve the swiftness and outcomes of percutaneous cardiac interventions. Therefore, procedure planning based on the specific anatomy is becoming a new standard of excellence in interventional cardiology. Still, we often tend to disregard specific spatial relations and the actual direction of catheter tip movement inside the body, relying on a try and error approach. The precise spatial orientation of instruments and prosthetic devices is crucial, especially during structural heart interventions. Here, we present how deliberate movements of objects under fluoroscopy can reveal the spatial orientation of catheters and other devices. We also propose a novel “two‐point rule” for identifying three‐dimensional relations between points in space. Understanding and applying this rule might substantially increase the spatial awareness of operators performing cardiovascular interventions. Although the concept is pretty simple, using it “live” during interventional cardiology procedures requires thorough understanding and practice. We propose the “two‐point rule” as a crucial rule to develop expertise in spatial orientation under fluoroscopy and ensure high‐quality outcomes.