Background— The optimal ablation strategy for persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) remains unclear. Methods and Results— This multicentre randomized study compared circumferential pulmonary vein ablation+linear ablation (control arm) versus circumferential pulmonary vein ablation+linear ablation+complex fractionated atrial electrogram (CFAE) ablation (CFAE arm) in patients with persistent AF. Circumferential pulmonary vein ablation was performed followed by roof and mitral isthmus ablation, before CFAE ablation in the CFAE arm. Ablation strategy was maintained at the first redo procedure. Sixty-five patients were recruited in each arm. The mean age was 61±10 years, 75% were men, median AF duration was 2 years, 42% had long-lasting persistent AF, 68% had associated cardiovascular disease, mean left atrial dimension was 46±6 mm, and median CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score was 2. Ablation and procedure times were significantly longer in the CFAE arm (70±20 versus 55±17; 201±35 versus 152±45 minutes; P <0.005). After a mean follow-up of 35±5 months, single-procedural success off antiarrhythmic drugs at 12 months (CFAE: 30/65 [46%] versus control: 37/65 [57%]; P =0.29) and multiprocedural success (CFAE: 51/65 [78%] versus control: 52/65 [80%]; P =1.0) were not significantly different. At the first redo procedure, patients in the CFAE arm had a higher incidence of organized atrial tachycardia/flutter (24/33 [73%] versus 11/31 [35%]; P =0.005) and gap-related macro–re-entrant flutter (8/33[24%] versus 1/31[3%]; P =0.03). Early recurrence of atrial arrhythmia was an independent predictor of late recurrence. Conclusions— CFAE ablation did not confer incremental benefit when performed in addition to circumferential pulmonary vein ablation and linear ablation. It was associated with a higher incidence of gap-related flutter. Clinical Trial Registration— URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT01711047.

Colchicine demonstrated superior efficacy versus usual care for prevention of atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery. Moreover, colchicine treatment was associated with shorter hospital stays. These benefits outweigh increased risk of adverse drug-related effects; although further work is needed to minimize gastrointestinal effects.

The British Heart Rhythm Society’s Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Management of Patients Developing QT Prolongation on Antipsychotic Medication are written for heart rhythm consultants, primary care physicians, specialist registrars, nurses and physiologists who may be requested to review ECGs or advise on cases where antipsychotic-induced QT prolongation is suspected or proven. The guidance is adapted from the latest Maudsley Prescribing Guidelines in Psychiatry, published in 2018.

Low energy biatrial shock is an effective means of restoring sinus rhythm in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Ventricular proarrhythmia is avoided provided that shocks are well synchronized to R waves that are not at closely coupled intervals or preceded by long-short cycles. Based on these principles, an implantable atrial defibrillator has been developed and was implanted in three patients with drug refractory paroxysmal AF. The device detects AF via an actively fixed right atrial and a self-retaining coronary sinus defibrillating leads, and delivers 3/3 ms biphasic shocks up to 300 V synchronized to the R wave. The mean implant threshold (ED50) was 195 V (1.8 J). and minimum voltage at conversion during follow-up assessments at 1, 3, and 6 months were 260 V, 2.5 J. 250 V, 2.3 J, and 300 V, 3.0 J respectively. Detection of AF was 100% specific and shocks were 100% synchronized, although only a proportion of synchronized R waves were considered suitable for shock delivery primarily because of closely coupled cycles. Three patients had 9 spontaneous AF episodes, 8/9 (89%) successfully defibrillated by shocks of 260-300 V. Sedation was not used in 4 out of 9 (45%) episodes. Backup ventricular pacing was initiated by the device in 6 out of (67%) episodes. One patient had more frequent AF after lead placement, which subsided after a change of medication. There was no ventricular proarrhythmia. It is concluded that an implantable atrial defibrillator is a viable therapy for selected patients with paroxysmal AF. The device is capable of accurate AF detection, R wave synchronization and ventricular support pacing after successful defibrillation of AF.