(2015) Comparison of methods for the analysis of therapeutic immunoglobulin G Fc-glycosylation profiles-Part 1: Separation-based methods, mAbs, 7:1, 167-179, DOI: 10.4161/19420862.2014.986000 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10. 4161/19420862.2014 Abbreviations: mAb, monoclonal antibody; Fc, fragment crystallizable; IgG, immunoglobulin G; HILIC-UPLC, hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography-ultra high performance liquid chromatography; 2-AB, 2-aminobenzamide; Fab, fragment, antigen-binding; CE-LIF, capillary electrophoresis-laser induced fluorescence; HPLC, high performance liquid chromatography; MALDI-MS, matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization-mass spectrometry; ESI-MS, electrospray ionization-mass spectrometry; HPAEC-PAD, high-performance anion exchange chromatography with pulsed amperometric detection; APTS, 8-aminopyrene-1, 3, 6-trisulfonic acid; DSA-FACE, DNA-sequencer-aided fluorophore-assisted carbohydrate electrophoresis; ANTS, 8-aminonaphthalene-1, 3, 6-trisulfonate; CCGE, cartridge-based capillary gel electrophoresis; HR, high resolution; IAB, InstantAB labeling; CHO, Chinese hamster ovaryImmunoglobulin G (IgG) crystallizable fragment (Fc) glycosylation is crucial for antibody effector functions, such as antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity, and for their pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamics behavior. To monitor the Fc-glycosylation in bioprocess development, as well as product characterization and release analytics, reliable techniques for glycosylation analysis are needed. A wide range of analytical methods has found its way into these applications. In this study, a comprehensive comparison was performed of separation-based methods for Fcglycosylation profiling of an IgG biopharmaceutical. A therapeutic antibody reference material was analyzed 6-fold on 2 different days, and the methods were compared for precision, accuracy, throughput and other features; special emphasis was placed on the detection of sialic acid-containing glycans. Seven, non-mass spectrometric methods were compared; the methods utilized liquid chromatography-based separation of fluorescent-labeled glycans, capillary electrophoresis-based separation of fluorescent-labeled glycans, or high-performance anion exchange chromatography with pulsed amperometric detection. Hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography-ultra high performance liquid chromatography of 2-aminobenzamide (2-AB)-labeled glycans was used as a reference method. All of the methods showed excellent precision and accuracy; some differences were observed, particularly with regard to the detection and quantitation of minor glycan species, such as sialylated glycans.
High-performance anion-exchange chromatography (HPAEC) coupled to pulsed amperometric detection (PAD) is a highly sensitive method for the analysis of oligosaccharides without the need for prior derivatization. However, the method suffers from the lack of chemical information with peak assignments based on the retention times of authentic standards or known peaks of reference materials. Here we applied HPAEC coupled on-line with electrospray ion trap mass spectrometry (HPAEC-MS) using a prototype mini-bore (1mm I.D.) CarboPac PA200 column and challenged the analytical separation based method for the structural assignment of heterogeneous mixtures of N-glycans derived from immunoglobulin G from human plasma, glyco-engineered CHO cells, and Sp2/0 mouse myeloma cells. Compared to an analytical scale 3mm I.D. column, the mini-bore column demonstrated a superior performance with up to 8-fold improved limit of detection for specific N-glycans determined by PAD. Quantitative evaluation by extracted ion current chromatograms revealed detection limits in the 50-100 femtomole range using ion trap MS operated in positive ionization mode. In our hands HPAEC-MS/MS allowed the detection and quantification of even low abundant glycan species including biantennary complex-type, high mannose, hybrid and hybrid bisected structures. In comparison to the detection of N-glycans as lithiated or sodiated adducts, we obtained a 65-fold improved signal-to-noise ratio with protonated ions only. Relative quantitative evaluation by single ion current chromatograms was successfully applied and demonstrated an excellent performance with respect to selectivity in the relative quantification of heterogeneous samples of N-glycans compared to HPAEC-PAD and HILIC-UPLC of 2-AB labelled N-glycans.
Recombinant human erythropoetin (EPO) is an important biopharmaceutical mainly used for the treatment of anemia. It is highly heterogeneous because of common amino acid chemical degradations known to occur in protein therapeutics (e.g., oxidation and deamidation) and its complex glycosylation profile. Recently, multi-attribute monitoring (MAM), i.e., the quantification of multiple post-translational and chemical modifications in a single peptide mapping liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (LC-MS)-based method, has received increased attention for the analysis of antibody-like biotherapeutic proteins. In this study, an MAM method for examination of residue-specific glycan profiles of EPO was established. The MAM method, by virtue of the increased sensitivity and selectivity provided with LC-MS, yielded additional site-specific information not afforded by the conventional quality control (QC) methods. Low abundant glycans as well as additional post-translational and chemical modifications could also be simultaneously detected by the MAM method. Our results demonstrate that desialylated N-oligosaccharides (DeNO) and N-acetylneuraminic acids (Neu5Ac) could be monitored by the developed MAM approach with data readout highly comparable to QC methods, while differences were observed for charge isoform distribution. In summary, the comparative data obtained demonstrate that MAM by LC-MS peptide mapping can, in principle, adequately replace selected QC methods and would add value to the in-process control and release testing strategy of EPO.
According to the data, no significant difference for either suture or stapler closure was observed, with the tendency for staple closure to be superior.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.