Although the effects of plant diversity on herbivores are contingent upon herbivore traits and the source of plant diversity (e.g. intra‐ and interspecific), most studies have analyzed these effects separately. We compared the effects of genotypic diversity of big‐leaf mahogany Swietenia macrophylla with that of tree species diversity on two specialist caterpillars (Hypsipyla grandella stem borers and Phyllocnistis meliacella leaf miners) and three generalist leafhoppers (Cicadellidae) feeding on mahogany in a large‐scale (7.2 ha) forest diversity experiment in southern Mexico. The experiment consisted of fifty‐nine 21 × 21‐m plots, with 64 tree saplings each (3‐m spacing between plants). Plots were either mahogany monocultures or species polycultures of four species (including mahogany) and – within each of these two plot types – mahogany was represented by either one or four genotypes. Throughout a five‐month period, beginning six months after planting, we measured mahogany growth and monitored herbivore and predator (spider) abundance. We found no effect of mahogany genotypic diversity on either specialist caterpillars or generalist leafhoppers, and this result was consistent across levels of tree species diversity. In contrast, species diversity had significant effects on both specialists but neither of the generalist herbivores. Specifically, species diversity lowered H. grandella attack at the middle of the sampling season, but increased attack at the end of the season, whereas P. meliacella abundance was consistently reduced. Such effects were not mediated by effects of species diversity on plant growth (of which there were none), but rather through resource heterogeneity. Diversity did not influence spider abundance. This study is one of few to directly compare sources of plant diversity, and uniquely compares such effects among herbivores with contrasting life histories (e.g. diet breadths). Overall, we demonstrate that plant species diversity effects outweigh those of genotypes, and our results suggest that such effects are stronger on specialist than generalist herbivores.
The interactions between pairs of native and alien plants via shared use of pollinators have been widely studied. Community level studies however, are necessary in order to fully understand the factors and mechanisms that facilitate successful plant invasion, but these are still scarce. Specifically, few community level studies have considered how differences in invasion level (alien flower abundance), and degree of floral trait similarity between native and invasive species, mediate effects on native plant-pollinator communities. Here, we evaluated the role of alien species on overall plant-floral visitor network structure, and on species-level network parameters, across nine invaded coastal communities distributed along 205 km in Yucatán, México that vary in alien species richness and flower abundance. We further assessed the potential the role of alien plant species on plant-floral visitor network structure and robustness via computational simulation of native and invasive plant extinction scenarios. We did not find significant differences between native and alien species in their functional floral phenotypes or in their visitation rate and pollinator community composition in these invaded sites. Variation in the proportion of alien plant species and flower abundance across sites did not influence plant-pollinator network structure. Species-level network parameters (i.e., normalized degree and nestedness contribution) did not differ between native and alien species. Furthermore, our simulation analyses revealed that alien species are functionally equivalent to native species and contribute equally to network structure and robustness. Overall, our results suggest that high levels of floral trait similarity and pollinator use overlap may help facilitate the integration of alien species into native plant-pollinator networks. As a result, alien species may also play a similar role than that of natives in the structure and stability of native plant and pollinator communities in the studied coastal sand dune ecosystem.
Despite potential interactive effects of plant species and genotypic diversity (SD and GD, respectively) on consumers, studies have usually examined these effects separately. We evaluated the individual and combined effects of tree SD and mahogany (Swietenia macrophylla) GD on the arthropod community associated with mahogany. We conducted this study within the context of a tree diversity experiment consisting of 74 plots with 64 saplings/plot. We sampled 24 of these plots, classified as monocultures of mahogany or polycultures of four species (including mahogany). Within each plot type, mahogany was represented by either one or four maternal families. We surveyed arthropods on mahogany and estimated total arthropod abundance and species richness, as well as abundance and richness separately for herbivorous and predatory arthropods. Overall tree SD and mahogany GD had positive effects on total arthropod species richness and abundance on mahogany, and also exerted interactive effects on total species richness (but not abundance). Analyses conducted by trophic level group showed contrasting patterns; SD positively influenced herbivore species richness but not abundance, and did not affect either predator richness or abundance. GD influenced predator species richness but not abundance, and did not influence herbivore abundance or richness. There were interactive effects of GD and SD only for predator species richness. These results provide evidence that intra‐ and inter‐specific plant diversity exert interactive controls on associated consumer communities, and that the relative importance of SD and GD may vary among higher trophic levels, presumably due to differences in the underlying mechanisms or consumer traits.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.