Segmentation of medical image data is getting more and more important over the last years. The results are used for diagnosis, surgical planning or workspace definition of robot-assisted systems. The purpose of this paper is to find out whether manual or semi-automatic segmentation is adequate for ENT surgical workflow or whether fully automatic segmentation of paranasal sinuses and nasal cavity is needed. We present a comparison of manual and semi-automatic segmentation of paranasal sinuses and the nasal cavity. Manual segmentation is performed by custom software whereas semi-automatic segmentation is realized by a commercial product (Amira). For this study we used a CT dataset of the paranasal sinuses which consists of 98 transversal slices, each 1.0 mm thick, with a resolution of 512 x 512 pixels. For the analysis of both segmentation procedures we used volume, extension (width, length and height), segmentation time and 3D-reconstruction. The segmentation time was reduced from 960 minutes with manual to 215 minutes with semi-automatic segmentation. We found highest variances segmenting nasal cavity. For the paranasal sinuses manual and semi-automatic volume differences are not significant. Dependent on the segmentation accuracy both approaches deliver useful results and could be used for e.g. robot-assisted systems. Nevertheless both procedures are not useful for everyday surgical workflow, because they take too much time. Fully automatic and reproducible segmentation algorithms are needed for segmentation of paranasal sinuses and nasal cavity.
The main aim of this study was to provide anatomical data on the heights of the human intervertebral discs for all levels of the thoracic spine by direct and radiographic measurements. Additionally, the heights of the neighboring vertebral bodies were measured, and the prediction of the disc heights based only on the size of the vertebral bodies was investigated. The anterior (ADH), middle (MDH) and posterior heights (PDH) of the discs were measured directly and on radiographs of 72 spine segments from 30 donors (age 57.43 ± 11.27 years). The radiographic measurement error and the reliability of the measurements were calculated. Linear and non-linear regression analyses were employed for investigation of statistical correlations between the heights of the thoracic disc and vertebrae. Radiographic measurements displayed lower repeatability and were shorter than the anatomical ones (approximately 9% for ADH and 37% for PDH). The thickness of the discs varied from 4.5 to 7.2 mm, with the MDH approximately 22.7% greater. The disc heights showed good correlations with the vertebral body heights (R 2 , 0.659-0.835, P-values < 0.005; ANOVA), allowing the generation of 10 prediction equations. New data on thoracic disc morphometry were provided in this study. The generated set of regression equations could be used to predict thoracic disc heights from radiographic measurement of the vertebral body height posterior. For the creation of parameterized models of the human thoracic discs, the use of the prediction equations could eliminate the need for direct measurement on intervertebral discs. Moreover, the error produced by radiographic measurements could be reduced at least for the PDH.
Manual segmentation is often used for evaluation of automatic or semi-automatic segmentation. The purpose of this paper is to describe the inter and intraindividual variability, the dubiety of manual segmentation as a gold standard and to find reasons for the discrepancy. We realized two experiments. In the first one ten ENT surgeons, ten medical students and one engineer outlined the right maxillary sinus and ethmoid sinuses manually on a standard CT dataset of a human head. In the second experiment two participants outlined maxillary sinus and ethmoid sinuses five times consecutively. Manual segmentation was accomplished with custom software using a line segmentation tool. The first experiment shows the interindividual variability of manual segmentation which is higher for ethmoidal sinuses than for maxillary sinuses. The variability can be caused by the level of experience, different interpretation of the CT data or different levels of accuracy. The second experiment shows intraindividual variability which is lower than interindividual variability. Most variances in both experiments appear during segmentation of ethmoidal sinuses and outlining hiatus semilunaris. Concerning the inter and intraindividual variances the segmentation result of one manual segmenter could not directly be used as gold standard for the evaluation of automatic segmentation algorithms.
Statistical correlations between anatomical dimensions of human vertebral structures have indicated a potential for the prediction of vertebral morphometry, which could be applied to the creation of simplified geometrical models of the spine excluding the need for preliminary processing of medical images. The aim of this study was to perform linear and nonlinear regressions with published anatomical data to generate prediction equations for 20 vertebral parameters of the human thoracic and lumbar spine as a function of only one given parameter that was measured by X-ray. Each parameter was considered individually as a potential predictor variable in terms of its correlation with all of the other parameters, together with the readiness with which lateral X-rays could be obtained. Based on this, the parameter vertebral body height posterior was chosen and the statistical analyses described here are related to this parameter. Our linear, exponential and logarithmic regressions provided significant predictions of anterior vertebral structures. However, third-order polynomial prediction equations allowed an improvement on these predictions (P-values < 0.001), e.g. endplates and spinal canal (R 2 , 0.970-0.995) as well as pedicle heights and the spinous process (R 2 , 0.811-0.882), in addition to a reasonable prediction of the posterior vertebral structures, which have shown a low or no correlation in previous studies, e.g. pedicle inclination and transverse process (R 2 , 0.514-0.693) (ANOVA). Comparisons of the theoretical predictions with two other sets of experimental data indicated that the predictions generally agree well with the experimental data. A time-efficient approach for obtaining anatomical data for the description of human thoracic and lumbar geometry was provided by this method, which requires the measurement of only one parameter per vertebra (vertebral body height posterior) from a lateral X-ray and the set of developed prediction equations. Vertebral models based on this type of parameterized geometry could be used in biomechanical studies that require geometry variation, such as in spinal deformations, including scoliosis.
The objective of this study was to describe and evaluate soft tissue and bone properties of nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses in ex vivo preparations for a safe robot-assisted endoscope movement during functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS). In a first experiment we measured forces exerted by the endoscope during FESS with a force/torque sensor. In a second experiment we used a purpose built device to exert forces on chosen tissue structures. The experiment was monitored by a custom software, which records force of the endoscope and the deformation and the breaking point of tissue. All tests were performed on five formalin fixed cadaver heads. In the first experiment we found that the average force during FESS is 2.21 N and the maximal force is 7.96 N. The force-way-ratio measurement shows highest elasticity for the ethmoidal bulla, followed by the lamina papyracea; however, they break at low forces (> or =6 N). Furthermore the carotid canal seems to have the lowest elasticity but it can tolerate forces up to 30 N. Based on these measurements force thresholds can be defined for robot-assisted endoscope guidance. All thresholds have to be assigned to subregions of the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.