Due to the abundant and lax tissue of the abdominal wall, most ventral trunk defects are amenable to local soft tissue closure. However, when abdominal defects are accompanied by a lack of soft tissue, the surgeon faces a more complex subset of reconstructions. Three important principles guide the reconstruction of these wounds: timing of closure, careful assessment of the true extent of the wound, and the components of the defect. This article focuses on these three guiding principles and suggests the authors' preferred technique for these difficult defects.
Background: Functional muscle transfer (FMT) can provide wound closure and restore adequate muscle function for patients with oncologic extremity defects. Herein we describe our institutional experience with FMT after oncological resection and provide a systematic review and meta-analysis of the available literature on this uncommon procedure.
Methods: A single-institution retrospective review was performed, including all patients who received FMT after oncological resection from 2005-2021. For the systematic review and meta-analysis, PubMed, Cochrane, Medline, and Embase libraries were queried according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines; results were pooled, weighted by study size, and analyzed.
Results: The meta-analysis consisted of seven studies with 70 patients overall, demonstrating a mean MRC score of 3.78 (95% CI, 2.97-4.56; p < 0.01). The systematic review included 28 studies with 103 patients. Receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with significantly lower mean MRC score (3.00 ± 1.35 vs. 3.90 ± 1.36; p = 0.019). Seventy-four percent of the patients underwent free FMT, with the most common donor muscle being the latissimus dorsi (55%). The flap loss rate was 0.8%. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (p = 0.03), radiotherapy (p = 0.05), pedicled FMTs (p = 0.01), and a recipient femoral nerve (p = 0.02) were associated with significantly higher complication rates. The institutional retrospective review identified 13 patients who underwent FMT after oncological resection with a median follow-up time of 21 months (range, 6-74 months). The most common tumor necessitating FMT was undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (77%), and the most common donor muscle was the latissimus dorsi (62%). A high body mass index was associated with prolonged neuromuscular recovery (R = 0.87, p = 0.002).
Conclusion: FMT after oncological resection may contribute to improved extremity function. Careful consideration of risk factors and preoperative planning is imperative for successful FMT outcomes.
Background
Tumor‐induced osteomalacia is a rare paraneoplastic syndrome in which patients develop hypophosphatemia and osteomalacia.
Methods and Results
Here, we report a unique case of a 42‐year‐old man who presented to our institution with a 1‐year history of pain in his ribs, hips, lower back, and feet. Radiologic examination revealed a decrease in bone density and multiple insufficiency fractures. Laboratory evaluation revealed hypophosphatemia, low serum 1,25 dihydroxy vitamin D3, and elevated fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF23). A positron emission tomography/CT scan showed increased uptake in the right mandibular third molar region. Panoramic radiography and CT scanning showed a lytic expansile bone lesion. A mandibular bone biopsy revealed a mixed connective tissue tumor. A right segmental mandibulectomy was performed, followed by microvascular reconstruction. The resection was confirmed by normalization of serum phosphate and FGF23.
Conclusion
Successful management of this condition was achieved, with complete surgical resection of the tumor and reconstructive surgery.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.