BackgroundMicroscopic evaluation of urine is inconsistently performed in veterinary clinics. The IDEXX SediVue Dx® Urine Sediment Analyzer (SediVue) recently was introduced for automated analysis of canine and feline urine and may facilitate performance of urinalyses in practice.ObjectiveCompare the performance of the SediVue with manual microscopy for detecting clinically relevant numbers of cells and 2 crystal types.SamplesFive‐hundred thirty urine samples (82% canine, 18% feline).MethodsFor SediVue analysis (software versions [SW] 1.0.0.0 and 1.0.1.3), uncentrifuged urine was pipetted into a cartridge. Images were captured and processed using a convolutional neural network algorithm. For manual microscopy, urine was centrifuged to obtain sediment. To determine sensitivity and specificity of the SediVue compared with manual microscopy, thresholds were set at ≥5/high power field (hpf) for red blood cells (RBC) and white blood cells (WBC) and ≥1/hpf for squamous epithelial cells (sqEPI), non‐squamous epithelial cells (nsEPI), struvite crystals (STR), and calcium oxalate dihydrate crystals (CaOx Di).ResultsThe sensitivity of the SediVue (SW1.0.1.3) was 85%‐90% for the detection of RBC, WBC, and STR; 75% for CaOx Di; 71% for nsEPI; and 33% for sqEPI. Specificity was 99% for sqEPI and CaOx Di; 87%‐90% for RBC, WBC, and nsEPI; and 84% for STR. Compared to SW1.0.0.0, SW1.0.1.3 had increased sensitivity but decreased specificity. Performance was similar for canine versus feline and fresh versus stored urine samples.Conclusions and Clinical ImportanceThe SediVue exhibits good agreement with manual microscopy for the detection of most formed elements evaluated, but improvement is needed for epithelial cells.

The two methods were precise, but the higher UPC ratios obtained with the CBB methods might affect the interpretation using the IRIS guidelines and clinical decisions.

Background: To date, little information is available about the effect of preanalytical factors on the urinary protein-to-creatinine (UPC) ratio in cats.Objectives: We aimed to evaluate the effect of a commercially available cat litter, creatinine measurements at three different dilutions of urine, and different storage conditions on the UPC ratio in cats.Methods: Feline urine specimens were prospectively collected. Twenty-two wholeurine specimens were placed uncovered and in contact with cat litter for 1 hour; 25 urine supernatants were diluted 1:10, 1:20, and 1:100 for creatinine measurements.The correlation, difference, agreement, and concordance in classifying specimens according to International Renal Interest Society staging were determined. Storage effects on UPC ratios were assessed in specimens stored for 6 hours at +20℃ (n = 20), 1 week at +4℃ (n = 20), and 3 months at −20℃ (n = 25). Specimens were also subjected to four freeze-thaw cycles (n = 20). Results were compared, and clinical significance was assessed by comparing each UPC ratio to the inter-assay range of the baseline value.Results: Exposure to cat litter did not affect UPC ratios. A positive proportional bias was found in the 1:100 dilution compared with the 1:20 dilution; however, concordance was high for all comparisons. At +20, +4℃, and after four repeated freeze-thaw cycles, UPC ratios were stable. Compared with baseline values, UPC ratios decreased (P < .01) after 8 and 12 weeks at −20℃. However, all UPC ratios were within the inter-assay variability of the baseline value.Conclusions: Exposure to cat litter did not affect UPC ratios, but further studies are necessary to evaluate other potential variables. The effects of the dilutions and storage conditions were clinically acceptable, although the 1:20 and 1:100 dilutions were not perfectly comparable.

Objectives The aim of this study was to assess whether, in contrast to serum creatinine, which is higher in Birman cats than in other breeds, the serum concentration of symmetric dimethylarginine (SDMA) is comparable in clinically healthy Birmans and in the general feline population. This could allow, in this breed, to better evaluate chronic kidney disease (CKD). Methods Serum creatinine and SDMA were measured in clinically healthy Birmans (n = 50) and in cats of other breeds (n = 46), and the results were statistically compared. A breed-specific reference interval (RI) was established for Birmans and compared with the RI for the general feline population (0.0-14.0 µg/dl). Results Creatinine (1.58 ± 0.36 mg/dl) and SDMA (12.2 ± 2.8 µg/dl) were higher ( P <0.001) in Birmans than in cats of other breeds (1.19 ± 0.17 mg/dl; 10.3 ± 2.5 µg/dl). In 20/50 Birman cats (40.0%) serum creatinine was higher than both the non-breed-specific RI of our laboratory and the threshold recommended to classify cats as IRIS stage 2 (1.6 mg/dl). The concentration of SDMA was higher than the pre-existing RI in 10/50 Birmans (20.0%) and in four cats of other breeds (8.7%). Among Birmans, the proportion of cats with SDMA >14 µg/dl was lower ( P <0.017) than the proportion of cats with creatinine >1.60 mg/dl. However, the deviation from the upper limit of the RI was lower than the analytical variability of the method in 7/10 Birmans and in 4/4 cats of other breeds. The breed-specific RI (3.5-18.7 µg/dl) overlapped with the pre-existing one. Conclusions and relevance SDMA may be a better marker of CKD in Birman cats than creatinine when non-breed-specific RIs are utilised. The coupled analysis of creatinine and SDMA could help prevent errors in diagnosing and staging CKD in Birman cats.

Background: Several breeds have physiological peculiarities that induce variations in reference intervals (RIs) compared with the general canine population. Shetland sheepdogs (SSs) are reported to be more predisposed to different diseases (eg, hyperlipidemia, gallbladder mucocele, and hypothyroidism). Consequently, a breedspecific approach is more often required. Objectives:The aim of this study was to determine whether the RIs of the general canine population could be applied to that of SSs, and to generate breed-specific RIs, where appropriate.Methods: Sixty clinically healthy and fasted SSs (36% of the population registered at the Italian Breed association) were examined. Routine hematology and biochemistry analyses were performed. The transference method was used to compare the results of SSs with the RIs of the general canine population. When these RIs were not validated, new RIs were generated according to the guidelines of the American Society of Veterinary Clinical Pathology. Differences associated with sex, age, coat color, and whether used as a pet, a herding dog, or an agility dog were also investigated. Results:The transference method validated for 30/38 SS RIs. For 6 of the remaining 8 variables, the difference with the claimed RIs could depend on preanalytical or analytical artifacts, whereas for glucose and total cholesterol, these differences could depend on breed peculiarities. However, in all SSs, the concentration of cholesterol was <12.95 mmol/L. Relevant differences associated with sex, age, coat color, and use were not found. Conclusions:This study suggests that breed-specific RIs should be used for glucose and cholesterol in SSs.