Background: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic presented a dramatic challenge to healthcare systems. Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital (Rozzano, MI, Italy) was declared a regional hub for the treatment of COVID-19 patients. Our plastic surgery team, in consultation with our breast surgery colleagues, decided to perform immediate implant-based breast reconstruction for patients undergoing mastectomy for cancer. In this report, we present our experience performing breast reconstruction with a new protocol in the first month following the COVID-19 pandemic in the most affected region in Italy. Methods: We adopted a new protocol to treat patients with breast cancer during the COVID-19 pandemic. The main goals of our protocol were to reduce the risk of COVID-19 spread for both patients and clinicians, postpone nononcologic and more advanced surgery, develop rapid recovery for early patient discharge (within 24 hours from surgery) through pain management, and finally reduce postoperative consultations. Results: The protocol was applied to 51 patients between early March and early April 2020. After 1 month, we decided to retrospectively review our experience. We found no significant differences in terms of postoperative pain and complication rate compared with our data in the pre-COVID period. Conclusion: Our new protocol is safe and effective, enabling tumor resection and immediate implant-based breast reconstruction, without increasing risks to the patient or staff.

To facilitate mini-access for cardiac surgery, two different methods of active venous drainage are used: vacuum assisted drainage and centrifugal pump aspiration on the venous line. The aim of this study was to compare the haemolysis produced using these two techniques. From June to December 1999, 50 consecutive patients were operated on using a ministernotomy. All of these patients had valvular surgery for either valve repair or valve replacement (9 MVRepair, 11 MVR, 29 AVR, 1 AVR + MVR). They were randomized into two groups: Group A, 25 patients who underwent surgery where vacuum assisted drainage was used, and Group B, 25 patients where kinetic asssisted venous drainage with centrifugal pump venous aspiration was used. Patient characteristics of both groups were similar for age, gender, body weight, body surface area, height, cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) time, aortic crossclamp time, priming volume, cardioplegia volume, haemoglobin concentration, haematocrit, serum creatinine, bilirubin, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase (sGOT), serum glutamic pyruvic transaminase (sGPT), aptoglobin, reticulocytes, and platelet count. We checked all these laboratory parameters preoperatively, at the end of CPB, and 2 and 24 h after operation. We also checked haemoglobinuria at these same time points. We assessed blood loss at 6, 12, and 24 h after the operation and calculated total postoperative bleeding. There was a tendency towards a greater increase in LDH, sGOT and sGPT in Group A more than in Group B, but these data did not reach statistical significance. Platelet count was always lower in Group A and aptoglobin increased in Group A more than in Group B. More patients in Group A had haemoglobinuria. These findings indicate that haemolysis is increased more in patients treated with vacuum assisted drainage, when compared to the rise in haemolysis in those treated with centrifugal pump venous drainage. Total bleeding is also greater in Group A.

No abstract