Biomarkers sensitive to functional impairment, neuronal loss, tau, and amyloid pathology based on MR, PET, and CSF studies are increasingly used to diagnose Alzheimer's disease (AD), but clinical validation is incomplete, hampering reimbursement by payers, widespread clinical implementation, and impacting on health care quality. An expert group convened to develop a strategic research agenda to foster the clinical validation of AD biomarkers. These demonstrated sufficient evidence of analytical validity (phase I of a structured framework adapted from oncology). Research priorities were identified based on incomplete clinical validity (phases II and III), and clinical utility (phases IV and V). Priorities included: definition of the assays; reading procedures and thresholds for normality; performance in detecting early disease; accounting for the effect of covariates; diagnostic algorithms comprising combinations of biomarkers; and developing best practice guidelines for the use of biomarkers in qualified memory clinics in the context of phase IV studies. 5 GlossaryBiomarker. An objective measure of a biological or pathogenic process with the purpose of evaluating disease risk or prognosis, guiding clinical diagnosis or monitoring therapeutic interventions. While the term originally referred to traceable substances produced by or introduced into an organism, it later evolved to any measurable parameter, including those obtained via imaging procedures.Roadmap. Objective-oriented, structured, and efficient action plan. In science and technology also called "strategic research agenda".Alzheimer's disease (AD) dementia. Traditionally and according to the National Institute of Neurological and Communicative Disorders and Stroke and the Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders Association (NINCDS-ADRDA) criteria, Alzheimer's disease was defined as a syndrome with progressive cognitive impairment severe enough to impact on daily activities. A diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease could only be made after exclusion of other possible causes. 1 Sixty-five to 80% of cases of patients fulfilling these criteria have Alzheimer's pathology (plaques and tangles), the remainder having a range of other pathologies. In order to increase diagnostic certainty, contemporary criteria for AD dementia incorporate biomarker evidence for different aspects of Alzheimer's pathology, including imaging (magnetic resonance imaging -MRI -measures of atrophy; 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography -FDG-PET -measures of cerebral hypometabolism; amyloid PET measures of fibrillar β-amyloid -A -deposition) and cerebrospinal fluid -CSF (decreased levels of A42, increased levels of tau and phospho-tau). 2,3 Alzheimer's disease process. Recognizing that AD pathology is present many years before symptoms emerge, new criteria classify the disease process on a continuum from asymptomatic to prodromal and finally to dementia stage. 4 Individuals at the asymptomatic stage can only be identified by biomarkers of Alzheimer's pathology. None...

SummaryBackgroundNutrition is an important modifiable risk factor in Alzheimer's disease. Previous trials of the multinutrient Fortasyn Connect showed benefits in mild Alzheimer's disease dementia. LipiDiDiet investigated the effects of Fortasyn Connect on cognition and related measures in prodromal Alzheimer's disease. Here, we report the 24-month results of the trial.MethodsLipiDiDiet was a 24-month randomised, controlled, double-blind, parallel-group, multicentre trial (11 sites in Finland, Germany, the Netherlands, and Sweden), with optional 12-month double-blind extensions. The trial enrolled individuals with prodromal Alzheimer's disease, defined according to the International Working Group (IWG)-1 criteria. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to active product (125 mL once-a-day drink containing Fortasyn Connect) or control product. Randomisation was computer-generated centrally in blocks of four, stratified by site. All study personnel and participants were masked to treatment assignment. The primary endpoint was change in a neuropsychological test battery (NTB) score. Analysis was by modified intention to treat. Safety analyses included all participants who consumed at least one study product dose. This trial is registered with the Dutch Trial Register, number NTR1705.FindingsBetween April 20, 2009, and July 3, 2013, 311 of 382 participants screened were randomly assigned to the active group (n=153) or control group (n=158). Mean change in NTB primary endpoint was −0·028 (SD 0·453) in the active group and −0·108 (0·528) in the control group; estimated mean treatment difference was 0·098 (95% CI −0·041 to 0·237; p=0·166). The decline in the control group was less than the prestudy estimate of −0·4 during 24 months. 66 (21%) participants dropped out of the study. Serious adverse events occurred in 34 (22%) participants in the active group and 30 (19%) in control group (p=0·487), none of which were regarded as related to the study intervention.InterpretationThe intervention had no significant effect on the NTB primary endpoint over 2 years in prodromal Alzheimer's disease. However, cognitive decline in this population was much lower than expected, rendering the primary endpoint inadequately powered. Group differences on secondary endpoints of disease progression measuring cognition and function and hippocampal atrophy were observed. Further study of nutritional approaches with larger sample sizes, longer duration, or a primary endpoint more sensitive in this pre-dementia population, is needed.FundingEuropean Commission 7th Framework Programme.

BackgroundThere is an urgent need for novel, noninvasive biomarkers to diagnose Alzheimer’s disease (AD) in the predementia stages and to predict the rate of decline. Therefore, we set up the European Medical Information Framework for Alzheimer’s Disease Multimodal Biomarker Discovery (EMIF-AD MBD) study. In this report we describe the design of the study, the methods used and the characteristics of the participants.MethodsParticipants were selected from existing prospective multicenter and single-center European studies. Inclusion criteria were having normal cognition (NC) or a diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or AD-type dementia at baseline, age above 50 years, known amyloid-beta (Aβ) status, availability of cognitive test results and at least two of the following materials: plasma, DNA, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). Targeted and untargeted metabolomic and proteomic analyses were performed in plasma, and targeted and untargeted proteomics were performed in CSF. Genome-wide SNP genotyping, next-generation sequencing and methylation profiling were conducted in DNA. Visual rating and volumetric measures were assessed on MRI. Baseline characteristics were analyzed using ANOVA or chi-square, rate of decline analyzed by linear mixed modeling.ResultsWe included 1221 individuals (NC n = 492, MCI n = 527, AD-type dementia n = 202) with a mean age of 67.9 (SD 8.3) years. The percentage Aβ+ was 26% in the NC, 58% in the MCI, and 87% in the AD-type dementia groups. Plasma samples were available for 1189 (97%) subjects, DNA samples for 929 (76%) subjects, MRI scans for 862 (71%) subjects and CSF samples for 767 (63%) subjects. For 759 (62%) individuals, clinical follow-up data were available. In each diagnostic group, the APOE ε4 allele was more frequent amongst Aβ+ individuals (p < 0.001). Only in MCI was there a difference in baseline Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) score between the A groups (p < 0.001). Aβ+ had a faster rate of decline on the MMSE during follow-up in the NC (p < 0.001) and MCI (p < 0.001) groups.ConclusionsThe characteristics of this large cohort of elderly subjects at various cognitive stages confirm the central roles of Aβ and APOE ε4 in AD pathogenesis. The results of the multimodal analyses will provide new insights into underlying mechanisms and facilitate the discovery of new diagnostic and prognostic AD biomarkers. All researchers can apply for access to the EMIF-AD MBD data by submitting a research proposal via the EMIF-AD Catalog.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (10.1186/s13195-018-0396-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Alzheimer’s disease is a heterogeneous disorder. Understanding the biological basis for this heterogeneity is key for developing personalized medicine. We identified atrophy subtypes in Alzheimer’s disease dementia and tested whether these subtypes are already present in prodromal Alzheimer’s disease and could explain interindividual differences in cognitive decline. First we retrospectively identified atrophy subtypes from structural MRI with a data-driven cluster analysis in three datasets of patients with Alzheimer’s disease dementia: discovery data (dataset 1: n = 299, age = 67 ± 8, 50% female), and two independent external validation datasets (dataset 2: n = 181, age = 66 ± 7, 52% female; dataset 3: n = 227, age = 74 ± 8, 44% female). Subtypes were compared on clinical, cognitive and biological characteristics. Next, we classified prodromal Alzheimer’s disease participants (n = 603, age = 72 ± 8, 43% female) according to the best matching subtype to their atrophy pattern, and we tested whether subtypes showed cognitive decline in specific domains. In all Alzheimer’s disease dementia datasets we consistently identified four atrophy subtypes: (i) medial-temporal predominant atrophy with worst memory and language function, older age, lowest CSF tau levels and highest amount of vascular lesions; (ii) parieto-occipital atrophy with poor executive/attention and visuospatial functioning and high CSF tau; (iii) mild atrophy with best cognitive performance, young age, but highest CSF tau levels; and (iv) diffuse cortical atrophy with intermediate clinical, cognitive and biological features. Prodromal Alzheimer’s disease participants classified into one of these subtypes showed similar subtype characteristics at baseline as Alzheimer’s disease dementia subtypes. Compared across subtypes in prodromal Alzheimer’s disease, the medial-temporal subtype showed fastest decline in memory and language over time; the parieto-occipital subtype declined fastest on executive/attention domain; the diffuse subtype in visuospatial functioning; and the mild subtype showed intermediate decline in all domains. Robust atrophy subtypes exist in Alzheimer’s disease with distinct clinical and biological disease expression. Here we observe that these subtypes can already be detected in prodromal Alzheimer’s disease, and that these may inform on expected trajectories of cognitive decline.

Using CSF proteomics, Tijms et al . identify three Alzheimer’s disease subtypes that show: 1) hyperplasticity and increased BACE1 levels; 2) innate immune activation; and 3) blood-brain barrier dysfunction with low BACE1 levels. Future therapeutics may need tailoring to individual disease subtypes.