347I.348II.349III.349IV.355V.378VI.381381References381Glossary379 Summary Hosts and their symbionts are involved in intimate physiological and ecological interactions. The impact of these interactions on the evolution of each partner depends on the time‐scale considered. Short‐term dynamics – ‘coevolution’ in the narrow sense – has been reviewed elsewhere. We focus here on the long‐term evolutionary dynamics of cospeciation and speciation following host shifts. Whether hosts and their symbionts speciate in parallel, by cospeciation, or through host shifts, is a key issue in host–symbiont evolution. In this review, we first outline approaches to compare divergence between pairwise associated groups of species, their advantages and pitfalls. We then consider recent insights into the long‐term evolution of host–parasite and host–mutualist associations by critically reviewing the literature. We show that convincing cases of cospeciation are rare (7%) and that cophylogenetic methods overestimate the occurrence of such events. Finally, we examine the relationships between short‐term coevolutionary dynamics and long‐term patterns of diversification in host–symbiont associations. We review theoretical and experimental studies showing that short‐term dynamics can foster parasite specialization, but that these events can occur following host shifts and do not necessarily involve cospeciation. Overall, there is now substantial evidence to suggest that coevolutionary dynamics of hosts and parasites do not favor long‐term cospeciation.

The advantage of sex has been among the most debated issues in biology. Surprisingly, the question of why sexual reproduction generally requires the combination of distinct gamete classes, such as small and large gametes, or gametes with different mating types, has been much less investigated. Why do systems with alternative gamete classes (i.e. systems with either anisogamy or mating types or both) appear even though they restrict the probability of finding a compatible mating partner? Why does the number of gamete classes vary from zero to thousands, with most often only two classes? We review here the hypotheses proposed to explain the origin, maintenance, number, and loss of gamete classes. We argue that fungi represent highly suitable models to help resolve issues related to the evolution of distinct gamete classes, because the number of mating types vary from zero to thousands across taxa, anisogamy is present or not, and because there are frequent transitions between these conditions. We review the nature and number of gamete classes in fungi, and we attempt to draw inferences from these data on the evolutionary forces responsible for their appearance, loss or maintenance, and number.

International audienceVariability in the way organisms reproduce raises numerous, and still unsolved, questions in evolutionary biology. In this study, we emphasize that fungi deserve a much greater emphasis in efforts to address these questions because of their multiple advantages as model eukaryotes. A tremendous diversity of reproductive modes and mating systems can be found in fungi, with many evolutionary transitions among closely related species. In addition, fungi show some peculiarities in their mating systems that have received little attention so far, despite the potential for providing insights into important evolutionary questions. In particular, selfing can occur at the haploid stage in addition to the diploid stage in many fungi, which is generally not possible in animals and plants but has a dramatic influence upon the structure of genetic systems. Fungi also present several advantages that make them tractable models for studies in experimental evolution. Here, we briefly review the unsolved questions and extant hypotheses about the evolution and maintenance of asexual vs. sexual reproduction and of selfing vs. outcrossing, focusing on fungal life cycles. We then propose how fungi can be used to address these long-standing questions and advance our understanding of sexual reproduction and mating systems across all eukaryotes

Female fecundity advantage in gynodioecious plants is required for the spread and maintenance of this reproductive system. However, not all reproductive characters show female advantage in all species. We used a meta-analysis to summarise differences between females and hermaphrodites reported from the literature for several reproductive traits. Further we tested three hypotheses, (1) that female plants of species with many ovules produce more seeds per fruit while those with few ovules produce heavier seeds, (2) that females are more pollen limited than hermaphrodites, and (3) that floral sexual size dimorphism is more pronounced in species with few ovules, either because female reproductive success is less limited by pollen availability in such species or because flowers with few ovules require a smaller floral structure to protect the carpels. Overall, females compared to hermaphrodites produced more but smaller flowers, had higher fruit set, higher total seed production, and produced heavier seeds that germinated better. Species with many versus few ovules differed in female advantage for flower size dimorphism, flower number, fruit set and total seed production. However seed size, seed set per fruit and seed germination differences between females and hermaphrodites did not differ significantly between species with few and many ovules. We also found no evidence for differential pollen limitation between females and hermaphrodites. Degree of floral sexual size dimorphism differed significantly between species with few and many ovules. Though pistillate flowers were generally smaller than those of hermaphrodites, species with many ovules showed less difference in flower size between the sexes, suggesting either that the protective role of the perianth constrains the evolution of sexual size dimorphism in species with many ovules or that selection for adequate pollination in species with many ovules impedes the reduction in flower size of females.