Objective Invasive monitoring is sometimes necessary to guide resective surgery in epilepsy patients, but the ideal method is unknown. In this systematic review, we assess the association of postresection seizure freedom and adverse events in stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) and subdural electrodes (SDE). Methods We searched three electronic databases (MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL [Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials]) from their inception to January 2018 with the keywords “electroencephalography,” “intracranial grid,” and “epilepsy.” Studies that presented primary quantitative patient data for postresection seizure freedom with at least 1 year of follow‐up or complication rates of SEEG‐ or SDE‐monitored patients were included. Two trained investigators independently collected data from eligible studies. Weighted mean differences (WMDs) with 95% confidence interval (CIs) were used as a measure of the association of SEEG or SDE with seizure freedom and with adverse event outcomes. Results Of 11 462 screened records, 48 studies met inclusion criteria. These studies reported on 1973 SEEG patients and 2036 SDE patients. Our systematic review revealed SEEG was associated with 61.0% and SDE was associated with 56.4% seizure freedom after resection (WMD = +5.8%, 95% CI = 4.7‐6.9%, P = .001). Furthermore, SEEG was associated with 4.8% and SDE was associated with 15.5% morbidity (WMD = −10.6%, 95% CI = −11.6 to −9.6%, P = .001). SEEG was associated with 0.2% mortality and SDE was associated with 0.4% mortality (WMD = −0.2%, 95% CI = −0.3 to −0.1%, P = .001). Significance In this systematic review of SEEG and SDE invasive monitoring techniques, SEEG was associated with fewer surgical resections yet better seizure freedom outcomes in those undergoing resections. SEEG was also associated with lower mortality and morbidity than SDE. Clinical studies directly comparing these modalities are necessary to understand the relative rates of seizure freedom, morbidity, and mortality associated with these techniques.
Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS) is a severe form of epilepsy characterized by childhood onset, multiple drugresistant seizure types, and long-term poor prognosis. 1 Given the difficulty controlling seizures in LGS, vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) and corpus callosotomy (CC) are both often considered palliative surgical options. 2 However, there is no current consensus about which procedure is superior or what procedure should be performed
Surgical treatment of deep or difficult to access lesions represents a unique and significant challenge for pediatric neurosurgeons. The introduction of stereotactic magnetic resonance-guided laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) over the last decade has had a dramatic impact on the landscape of pediatric neurosurgery. LITT provides a safe and effective option for children with epilepsy from hypothalamic hamartoma that represents a groundbreaking new therapy for a condition which was historically very difficult to treat with previous neurosurgical techniques. LITT has also been used as an alternative surgical technique for mesial temporal sclerosis, focal cortical dysplasia, MR-negative epilepsy, cavernoma-related epilepsy, insular epilepsy, and corpus callosotomy among other epilepsy etiologies. In some cases, LITT has been associated with improved cognitive outcomes compared to standard techniques, as in mesial temporal lobe epilepsy. Initial experiences with LITT for neuro-oncologic processes are also promising. LITT is often attractive to patients and providers as a minimally invasive approach, but the differences in safety and clinical outcome between LITT and traditional approaches are still being studied. In this review, we examine the emerging indications and clinical evidence for LITT in pediatric neurosurgery.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.