IntroductionThe aim of this study was to investigate the construct validity and test-retest reliability of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ; long form) and the Short QUestionnaire to Assess Health-enhancing physical activity (SQUASH) and to investigate the relation between daily physical activity and clinical assessments in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS).MethodsFor validity, the self-report questionnaires IPAQ and SQUASH were compared with daily physical activity assessed with the ActiGraph accelerometer during 7 consecutive days in 63 AS outpatients. For reliability, the IPAQ and SQUASH were administered twice approximately 1 week apart in 52 AS outpatients. In all 115 patients, clinical assessments were performed at the outpatient clinic.ResultsIPAQ and SQUASH total scores correlated significantly with accelerometer outcome: ρ = 0.38 and r = 0.35, respectively. Intraclass correlation coefficients between first and second assessments of the IPAQ and SQUASH were 0.83 and 0.89, respectively. Bland-Altman analyses showed no systemic bias, but in particular for the IPAQ the 95% limits of agreement were wide. Daily physical activity assessed by accelerometer, IPAQ, and SQUASH correlated significantly with disease activity, physical activity, and quality of life. A relation with spinal mobility was found only for the accelerometer and SQUASH. The direction of these correlations indicates that higher daily physical activity is related to lower disease activity and better physical function, spinal mobility and quality of life.ConclusionsBoth physical activity questionnaires showed modest construct validity. The SQUASH showed good test-retest reliability, superior to the IPAQ. These results indicate that the SQUASH is more suitable than the IPAQ to assess daily physical activity in AS population studies. However, it is desirable to add questions on AS-specific physical activity. Further studies are needed to investigate the causality of the relation between daily physical activity and clinical assessments.
The numbers of lower limb amputees participating in recreational activity date back more than 25 years. Previous studies have shown that 60% of lower limb amputees participated in recreational activities, including sports. To date, research in The Netherlands into sports participation of this specific amputee population is insufficient. The purpose of the reported survey was to investigate the sports participation habits of lower limb amputees in the Province of Drenthe, The Netherlands, using a self-constructed questionnaire. A total of 105 lower limb amputees responded (36%), a large proportion of whom were traumatic amputees (31%). Of the respondents, 34 (32%) participated in some form of sport. Results indicated that participation in sport before the amputation was a predetermining factor for amputees to participate in sports whilst the level of amputation, age and etiology were not predetermining factors of participation in sports after a lower limb amputation.
Background Physical activity questionnaires are considered to be the most applicable method to assess daily physical activity in population studies because of participant convenience, minimal cost, and scoring flexibility. The International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) and the Short QUestionnaire to Asses Health-enhancing physical activity (SQUASH) are recall questionnaires that have acceptable construct validity and moderate to high test-retest reliability in healthy populations.(1,2) Until now, the validity and reliability of these physical activity questionnaires have not been studied in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS). Objectives To investigate the construct validity and test-retest reliability of the IPAQ and SQUASH in patients with AS. Methods The self-report questionnaires IPAQ (long form) and SQUASH were compared with daily physical activity assessed using the ActiGraph accelerometer during 7 consecutive days (gold standard) in 63 AS outpatients. The IPAQ and SQUASH were administered on two different occasions approximately one week apart in 52 AS outpatients. All patients fulfilled the modified New York criteria for AS or the ASAS criteria for axial spondyloarthritis. Validity was examined by calculating Spearman’s and Pearson’s correlation coefficients between accelerometer activity counts and IPAQ and SQUASH total scores, respectively. Test-retest reliability of the IPAQ and SQUASH was investigated by calculating intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) between the first and the second assessments of the questionnaires. Additionally, Bland-Altman analysis was performed. Results Mean age of the in total 115 AS patients was 45 years (SD ± 12), median disease duration was 16 years (range 0-54), and 62% were male. IPAQ and SQUASH total scores correlated significantly with accelerometer outcome: ρ=0.38 and r=0.35, respectively. ICC’s between first and second assessments of the IPAQ and SQUASH were 0.83 and 0.89, respectively. Bland-Altman analyses showed no systemic bias, but in particular for the IPAQ the 95% limits of agreement were wide. Conclusions Both physical activity questionnaires showed moderate construct validity. The SQUASH showed good test-retest reliability, superior to the IPAQ. These results indicate that the SQUASH can be used to assess daily physical activity in AS population studies. References Craig CL, Marshall AL, Sjostrom M, et al. International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003;35:1381-95. Wendel-Vos GC, Schuit AJ, Saris WH, et al. Reproducibility and relative validity of the short questionnaire to assess health-enhancing physical activity. J Clin Epidemiol. 2003;56:1163-9. Disclosure of Interest None Declared
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.