Vesicular glutamate transporters (VGLUTs) are responsible for glutamate trafficking and for the subsequent regulated release of this excitatory neurotransmitter at the synapse. Three isoforms of the VGLUT have been identified, now known as VGLUT1, VGLUT2, and VGLUT3. Both VGLUT1 and VGLUT2 have been considered definitive markers of glutamatergic neurons, whereas VGLUT3 is expressed in nonglutamatergic neurons such as cholinergic striatal interneurons. It is widely believed that VGLUT1 and VGLUT2 are expressed in a complementary manner at the cortical and thalamic levels, suggesting that these glutamatergic neurons fulfill different physiological functions. In the present work, we analyzed the pattern of VGLUT1 and VGLUT2 mRNA expression at the thalamic level by using single and dual in situ hybridization. In accordance with current beliefs, we found significant expression of VGLUT2 mRNA in all the thalamic nuclei, while moderate expression of VGLUT1 mRNA was consistently found in both the principal relay and the association thalamic nuclei. Interestingly, individual neurons within these nuclei coexpressed both VGLUT1 and VGLUT2 mRNAs, suggesting that these individual thalamic neurons may have different ways of trafficking glutamate. These results call for a reappraisal of the previously held concept regarding the mutually exclusive distribution of VGLUT transporters in the central nervous system.

No abstract

The present study describes the thalamic innervation coming from the rat parafascicular nucleus (PF) onto striatal and subthalamic efferent neurons projecting either to the globus pallidus (GP) or to the substantia nigra pars reticulata (SNr) by using a protocol for multiple neuroanatomical tracing. Both striatofugal neurons targeting the ipsilateral SNr (direct pathway) as well as striatal efferent neurons projecting to the ipsilateral GP (indirect pathway) were located within the terminal fields of the thalamostriatal afferents. In the subthalamic nucleus (STN), both neurons projecting to ipsilateral GP as well as neurons projecting to ipsilateral SNr also appear to receive thalamic afferents. Although the projections linking the caudal intralaminar nuclei with the ipsilateral striatum and STN are far more prominent, we also noticed that thalamic axons could gain access to the contralateral STN. Furthermore, a small number of STN neurons were seen to project to both the contralateral GP and PF nuclei. These ipsi-and contralateral projections enable the caudal intralaminar nuclei to modulate the activity of both the direct and the indirect pathway. J. Comp. Neurol. 483:143-153, 2005.

The present study analyses the anatomical arrangement of the projections linking the Wistar rat parafascicular thalamic nucleus (PF) and basal ganglia structures, such as the striatum and the subthalamic nucleus (STN), by using neuroanatomical tract-tracing techniques. Both the thalamostriatal and the striato-entopeduncular projections were topographically organized, and several areas of overlap between identi®ed circuits were noticed, sustaining the existence of up to three separated channels within the Nauta±Mehler loop. Thalamic afferents arising from dorsolateral PF territories are in register with striatofugal neurons located in dorsolateral striatal areas, which in turn project to dorsolateral regions of the entopeduncular nucleus (ENT). Medial ENT regions are innervated by striatal neurons located within medial striatal territories, these neurons being the target for thalamic afferents coming from medial PF areas. Finally, afferents from neurons located in ventrolateral PF areas approached striatal neurons in ventral and lateral striatal territories, which in turn project towards ventral and lateral ENT regions. Efferent STN neurons projecting to ENT were found to be the apparent postsynaptic target for thalamo-subthalamic axons. The thalamo-subthalamic projection was also topographically organized. Medial, central and lateral STN territories are innervated by thalamic neurons located within medial, ventrolateral and dorsolateral PF areas, respectively. Thus, each individual PF subregion projects in a segregated fashion to speci®c parts of the striato-entopeduncular and subthalamo-entopeduncular systems. These circuits enabled the caudal intralaminar nuclei to modulate basal ganglia output.

No abstract