Objective: To assess the impact on stroke outcome of statin use in the acute phase after IV thrombolysis.Methods: Multicenter study on prospectively collected data of 2,072 stroke patients treated with IV thrombolysis. Outcome measures of efficacy were neurologic improvement (NIH Stroke Scale [NIHSS] # 4 points from baseline or NIHSS 5 0) and major neurologic improvement (NIHSS # 8 points from baseline or NIHSS 5 0) at 7 days and favorable (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] # 2) and excellent functional outcome (mRS # 1) at 3 months. Outcome measures of safety were 7-day neurologic deterioration (NIHSS $ 4 points from baseline or death), symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage type 2 with NIHSS $ 4 points from baseline or death within 36 hours, and 3-month death. Statins are recommended for primary and secondary stroke prevention in patients at risk of cerebrovascular events. Results1 In addition to reducing the risk of first and recurrent ischemic stroke, statin treatment may also improve outcome through pleiotropic non-cholesterol-dependent effects. 2An association between statin use before stroke and favorable outcome has been previously reported.3-5 Moreover, a prospective clinical trial showed that statin withdrawal during the first 3 days after a stroke event was associated with increased risk of death or dependency at 3 months. 6 To date, very few studies have investigated the effect of statin use in the acute phase on ischemic stroke outcome.7-9 The Stroke Prevention with Aggressive Reductions in Cholesterol Levels (SPARCL) trial showed a trend toward less severity for outcome 90 days after stroke with atorvastatin administration (80 mg), compared with placebo, in patients having a stroke during the trial. 10So far, few studies have assessed the efficacy and safety of statin treatment in ischemic stroke patients treated with IV thrombolysis. Two recent meta-analyses showed that prior statin use may increase the risk of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH) within 36 hours after IV recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rtPA), though without influencing 3-month functional outcome. 11,12 Two large observational studies reported that previous treatment with statin was not an independent predictor of functional outcome or of ICH. 13,14 The aim of the THRombolysis and STatins (THRaST) study was to assess the impact of statin use in the acute phase of ischemic stroke on clinical outcome in patients treated with IV thrombolysis.Authors' affiliations are listed at the end of the article. Go to Neurology.org for full disclosures. Funding information and disclosures deemed relevant by the authors, if any, are provided at the end of the article.
We report a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot trial of systemic high-dose recombinant interferon alfa-2a (rIFNA) in 20 patients with relapsing-remitting (RR) multiple sclerosis (MS). Patients received 9 million IU rIFNA (n = 12) or placebo (n = 8) intramuscularly every other day for 6 months. Clinical exacerbations or new or enlarging lesions on serial MRI occurred in two of 12 rIFNA-treated and in seven of eight placebo-treated patients (p< 0.005). There was only one enlarging MRI lesion in the rIFNA group, whereas 27 new or enlarging lesions were present in the placebo group (p < 0.01). Baseline lymphocyte interferon gamma production of 19.10 +/- 7.12 IU/ml significantly decreased to 3.03 +/- 0.66 IU/ml (p < 0.04) in the rIFNA group, whereas production was unchanged in the placebo group. The rIFNA was tolerated without dropouts or serious side effects, but fever, malaise, fatigue (interfering with daily activities in two patients), and leukopenia occurred frequently. Neuropsychological tests excluded neurotoxicity. High-dose systemic rIFNA might reduce clinical and MRI signs of disease activity in RR MS and should be investigated in larger trials.
Reduced awareness of illness is a well-known phenomenon that has been studied in patients with vascular disease, but the precise nature of their executive dysfunction is an intriguing question that still has to be resolved. It would be particularly interesting to study patients with reduced awareness of disease possibly related to vascular lesions of the prefrontal cortex. Due to the clinical importance of the case, here we present a patient with a selective right anterior cingulate ischemic injury and impaired awareness of deficits. We suggest that the cingulo-frontal area dysfunction may represent one of the corresponding neurobiological substrates of his persistent unawareness, which has not yet been evaluated in the literature on patients with acquired brain injury (ABI).
are constantly negative, and peripheral T CD4+ cells remain low (last determination, 173 cells/mm").Severe CNS HSV-1 infections have never been described in patients with idiopathic T CD4t lymphocytopenia, despite the relevant role played by cellular immunity against HSV-1. Interestingly, our patient presented a radiologic picture of diffuse leukoencephalomyelitis, which is a very unusual presentation of CNS HSV-1 infection, even in patients with AIDS.6 Although the detection of HSV by PCR in CSF without histopathologic confirmation is not always diagnostic of HSV-related disease of the CNS in immunocompromised patients: the favorable response with regression of the clinical and radiologic involvement under antiherpetic therapy seems highly supportive of this diagnosis. As usually observed in patients with T CD4+ idiopathic lymphocytopenia,"6 it is impossible to establish the level of circulating T CD4+ cells before the development of the case-index disease, which was HSV meningoencephalomyelitis in our patient. It is, however, of note that the number of circulating T CD4+ cells remained extremely low 1 year after the acute episode.We conclude that clinicians should be aware that CNS herpetic diseases (also with unusual radiologic presentation) can occur in patients with T CD4+ cell deficiency other than HIV induced. These infections, in our opinion, require a more aggressive therapy than in an immunocompetent host, whereas the effectiveness of a long-term prophylaxis remains open to study.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.