Background COVID-19 caused by SARS-CoV-2 ranges from asymptomatic to severe disease and can cause fatal and devastating outcome in many cases. In this study, we have compared the clinical, biochemical and immunological parameters across the different disease spectrum of COVID-19 in Bangladeshi patients. Methodology/Principal findings This longitudinal study was conducted in two COVID-19 hospitals and also around the community in Dhaka city in Bangladesh between November 2020 to March 2021. A total of 100 patients with COVID-19 infection were enrolled and classified into asymptomatic, mild, moderate and severe cases (n = 25/group). In addition, thirty age and sex matched healthy participants were enrolled and 21 were analyzed as controls based on exclusion criteria. After enrollment (study day1), follow-up visits were conducted on day 7, 14 and 28 for the cases. Older age, male gender and co-morbid conditions were the risk factors for severe COVID-19 disease. Those with moderate and severe cases of infection had low lymphocyte counts, high neutrophil counts along with a higher neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) at enrollment; this decreased to normal range within 42 days after the onset of symptom. At enrollment, D-dimer, CRP and ferritin levels were elevated among moderate and severe cases. The mild, moderate, and severe cases were seropositive for IgG antibody by day 14 after enrollment. Moderate and severe cases showed significantly higher IgM and IgG levels of antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 compared to mild and asymptomatic cases. Conclusion/Significance We report on the clinical, biochemical, and hematological parameters associated with the different severity of COVID-19 infection. We also show different profile of antibody response against SARS-CoV-2 in relation to disease severity, especially in those with moderate and severe disease manifestations compared to the mild and asymptomatic infection.

Metastases with soft tissues invasion, impending fractures or spinal cord compression (complicated bone metastases) represent a common clinical problem in advanced cancers and frequently lead to deterioration of patients' quality of life (QoL). A phase I-II study was planned to define the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of a short-course radiotherapy (RT) and its efficacy in palliation of complicated bone metastases. A phase I trial was designed with three dose-escalation steps: 16, 18, and 20 Gy. Total dose at each level was delivered in 2 days, twice daily. Eligibility criteria were painful complicated bone metastases and ECOG performance status ≤ 3. The presence of acute toxicity ≥ Grade 3 (RTOG scale) was considered the dose limiting toxicity. The MTD was used to plan a phase II trial with pain response as the primary outcome. Pain was recorded using a Visual Analogic Scale (VAS), and QoL using CLAS scales. Forty-five patients were enrolled in this trial. In phase I no Grade ≥ 2 acute toxicities were recorded. Thus 20 Gy was established as MTD. In phase II, with a median follow-up of 4 months, rates of complete symptom remission, partial response, no symptomatic change, and symptoms progression were 32.0%, 52.0%, 8.0%, and 8.0%, respectively. This RT protocol tested in our study is effective and tolerable with comparable results to traditional RT treatments delivered in 5-10 daily fractions.

No abstract

Aim: To define safety and efficacy of a palliative, short-course accelerated radiation therapy for symptomatic locally advanced primary pelvic cancer. Materials and Methods: A phase II trial was planned based on the minimax Simon's twostage design. A total of 18 Gy in 4.5 Gy/fraction administered twice a day was delivered (SHARON). Pain and quality of life were recorded according to the Visual Analogue self-assessment and the cancer linear analog scales (CLAS), respectively. Results: Twenty-five patients were enrolled in the study. The most frequent baseline symptoms were pain (48%), bleeding (40%), bleeding/pain (8%), and intestinal sub-occlusion (4%). The overall palliative response rate was 96.0%, with a median palliative duration of 6 months. An improvement of quality-oflife indices (well-being, fatigue, and ability to perform daily activities) was noted in 64.0%, 36.0%, and 48.0% of patients, respectively. Conclusion: The SHARON regimen was well tolerated and effective in the palliative treatment of patients with locally advanced pelvic cancer. Based on these results, a multicentric prospective phase III trial is ongoing to compare this regimen with traditional 2-week radiotherapy treatment. Symptoms such as pain, bleeding, intestinal/urinary occlusion, nausea, and vomiting can deeply affect the quality of life (QoL) of patients with locally advanced pelvic cancers (1-5). Moreover, for symptomatic patients with metastatic disease or severe comorbidities, radical treatments are generally contraindicated. Palliative radiotherapy (RT) can be an effective option to control symptoms and consequently improve patient QoL (6). Short-course RT regimens have several advantages in the palliative setting: i) Reduced discomfort for patients, ii) reduced delay of systemic treatment when indicated, iii) reduced delay until hospice admission, and iv) reduced costs for the health system. These advantages are particularly interesting in lesser resourced settings with long waiting lists for RT (7). Our group previously reported the results of hypofractionated-accelerated RT (delivered in four fractions on 2 consecutive days) in different palliative settings: complicated bone metastases, brain metastases, head and neck cancer, thoracic tumors, and elderly patients (8-13). The treatment was well tolerated and effective in terms of symptom relief. A potential risk while using a hypo-fractionated regimen is the development of long-term radiation-related side-effects 4237 This article is freely accessible online.

Short-course accelerated radiotherapy was well tolerated and effective for palliation. These findings may help design future prospective randomized studies.