Objective. The impacts of hepatitis C virus (HCV) and hepatitis B virus (HBV) infections on patient and renal graft survivals are controversial. This study sought to evaluate the effects of pretransplantation HCV and HBV infections on renal transplant patients and their grafts at our center. Patients and Methods. We retrospectively examined 1224 renal transplantations performed between 1992 and 2006, including 28 HBsAg positive; 64, anti-HCV; 9, anti-HCV plus HBsAg positive; and 1123, negative for anti-HCV and HBsAg. The mean posttransplantation follow-up was 5.6 Ϯ 4.1 years.Results. The prevalences of HBV infection were 6.2% in 1994 and 2.3% in 2006 and those of HCV infection were 6.8% in 1998 and 5.2% in 2006. The rejection rate was higher among HBVϩ (46.4%) and HCVϩ (40.6%) groups than the negative groups (31.5%), but it was not significant. There were no significant differences in patient and graft survivals among the groups. The major cause of patient death was liver failure among patients with concomitant HBVϩ and HCVϩ infections and cardiovascular disease among HCVϩ and negative patients. Conclusions. There has been a decrease in the prevalence of recipients with hepatitis virus infections over the last 15 years. Patient and graft survivals were not affected by HCV or HBV infection.
This study examined whether passive static stretching reduces the maximum muscle strength achieved by different body segments in untrained and resistance-trained subjects. Twenty adult men were assigned to 1 of the following groups: untrained (UT, N = 9) and resistance-trained (RT, N = 11) groups. The subjects performed six 1 repetition maximum (1RM) load tests of the following exercises: horizontal bench press, lat pull-downs, bicep curls, and 45° leg press. The results achieved in the last two 1RM tests were used for statistical analyses. A passive static stretching program was incorporated before the sixth 1RM test. The body fat content was significantly higher in the UT group compared with the RT group (p < 0.0001). Moreover, the RT group showed significantly higher proportion of lean body mass compared with the UT group (p < 0.0001). Maximum muscle strength on all 4 exercises was significantly reduced in both groups after stretching (p < 0.01). Furthermore, the magnitude of muscle strength reduction was similar for the UT and the RT groups. The exception was for barbell curls, in which the muscle strength depression was significantly higher in the UT group compared with the RT group (p < 0.0001). In conclusion, the passive static stretching program was detrimental to upper- and lower-body maximal muscle strength performance in several body segments. The negative effects of stretching were similar for subjects participating in resistance training regimens.
Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. OnBehalf on behalf of the Investigators of " Portuguese Registry of ACS " Introduction Sustained ventricular tachycardia (SVT) complicates up to 20% of acute coronary syndromes (ACS) and it is, therefore, important to access its impact on prognosis and identify patients with higher risk of SVT. Objective To evaluate predictors of early onset (<48h) and late onset (≥48h) SVT. Methods Based on a multicenter retrospective study, data collected from admissions between 1/10/2010 and 4/09/2019. Patients (pts) were divided in two groups (G): A – pts that presented early onset SVT (ESVT), and B – pts that presented late onset SVT (LSVT). Pts without data on previous cardiovascular history or uncompleted clinical data were excluded. Logistic regression was performed to assess predictors of SVT in ACS. Results Between 29851 pts with ACS, 364 (1.2%) presented SVT. ESVT – 251 pts (69%); LSVT – 91 pts (25%). LSVT G was older (74 ± 13 vs 68 ± 14, p = 0.003), was admitted directly to cat lab less frequently (10.1% vs 24.8%, p = 0.003), had longer times from first symptoms to admission (440min vs 261 min, p < 0.001) and had higher rates of previous stroke (14.4% vs 6.8%, p = 0.028). LSVT G had higher rates of non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (MI) (35.2% vs 23.1%, p = 0.025) and lower rates of ST-elevation MI (53.8% vs 71.7%, p = 0.002), although both G were similar regarding MI location (anterior – p = 0.135, inferior – p = 0.097). LSVT G had higher systolic blood pression (130 ± 33 vs 122 ± 33, p = 0.050), presented more frequently in Killip-Kimball class ≥2 (52.5% vs 35.5%, p = 0.005) and with atrial fibrillation (21.2% vs 12.4%, p = 0.045), and had higher brain-natriuretic peptide (1075 vs 329, p < 0.001). LSVT G was treated more frequently with diuretics (80.0% vs 47.8%, p < 0.001), amiodarone (62.2% vs 48.8%, p = 0.029), digoxin (8.9% vs 2.4%, p = 0.013) and levosimendan (11.1% vs 2.8%, p = 0.004). ESVT G had higher rates of performed coronarography (88.4% vs 79.1%, p = 0.028) but lower rate of 3 vessels disease (58.5% vs 70.8%, p = 0.017). LSVT G had higher rates of severe (<30%) left ventricle dysfunction (32.9% vs 15.4%, p < 0.001) and need to non-invasive ventilation (23.1% vs 6.8%, p < 0.001). Regarding in-hospital complications, ESVT G had higher rates of heart failure (34.7% vs 19.1%, p = 0.006), atrioventricular block (15.7% vs 1.1%, p < 0.001), atrial fibrillation (20.4% vs 7.7%, p = 0.006) and major haemorrhage (5.2% vs 0.0%, p = 0.024). LSVT G had higher rates of in-hospital death (44.4% vs 20.9%, p < 0.001) and in-hospital stay (14 days vs 7 days, p < 0.001). The G were similar regarding re-infarction (p = 0.216), shock (p = 0.179), mechanical complications (p = 1.00), cardiac arrest (p = 0.097) and stroke (0.348) rates. Logistic regression confirmed ESVT was predictive in-hospital heart failure (p = 0.010, OR 2.67) and de novo AF (p = 0.001, OR 5.56), whether LSVT was predictive of in-hospital death (p = 0.002, OR 2.70). Conclusion LSVT was associated with higher rates of in-hospital complications, but ESVT was associated with higher in-hospital mortality.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.