Background: Protein kinase C-related kinases (PRKs) are involved in the development of cancer and hepatitis C. Results: N-terminal domains of PRK2 inhibit the interaction with its upstream kinase and are responsible for a dimerization that inhibits PRK2 activity. Conclusion: PRK2 regulation requires a cross-talk between the N-and C-terminal domains. Significance: The results provide new perspectives to pharmacologically target PRK2.

The members of the AGC kinase family frequently exhibit three conserved phosphorylation sites: the activation loop, the hydrophobic motif (HM), and the zipper (Z)/turn-motif (TM) phosphorylation site. 3-Phosphoinositide-dependent protein kinase 1 (PDK1) phosphorylates the activation loop of numerous AGC kinases, including the protein kinase C-related protein kinases (PRKs). Here we studied the docking interaction between PDK1 and PRK2 and analyzed the mechanisms that regulate this interaction. In vivo labeling of recombinant PRK2 by 32 P i revealed phosphorylation at two sites, the activation loop and the Z/TM in the C-terminal extension. We provide evidence that phosphorylation of the Z/TM site of PRK2 inhibits its interaction with PDK1. Our studies further provide a mechanistic model to explain different steps in the docking interaction and regulation. Interestingly, we found that the mechanism that negatively regulates the docking interaction of PRK2 to the upstream kinase PDK1 is directly linked to the activation mechanism of PRK2 itself. Finally, our results indicate that the mechanisms underlying the regulation of the interaction between PRK2 and PDK1 are specific for PRK2 and do not apply for other AGC kinases.The regulation of protein function by phosphorylation and dephosphorylation is a key mechanism of intracellular signaling pathways in eukaryotic organisms. Protein phosphorylation is catalyzed by protein kinases, which are themselves often regulated by phosphorylation (1). The specificity of protein kinases is essential for their cellular functions. In some groups of protein kinases, the specificity is achieved by means of "docking interactions." Protein kinase docking interactions involve a recognition site on the kinase or a flanking domain that is different from the active site. The most notable example, MAP kinases, uses a docking interaction to specifically recognize substrates, upstream kinases, and phosphatases. Despite the large amount of data on protein kinase docking interactions, e.g. in the MAP kinase field, there is very little information on how these essential interactions are regulated (2-4).3-Phosphoinositide-dependent protein kinase 1 (PDK1) 3 belongs to the AGC family of protein kinases and is the activation loop kinase for several other AGC kinases (5). A key feature of the AGC kinase family members except PDK1 is the presence of a C-terminal extension (CT) to the catalytic core that contains a conserved hydrophobic motif (HM) harboring a phosphorylation site. In many AGC kinases, the HM mediates a docking interaction with PDK1. For example, p90 ribosomal S6 kinase (RSK), p70 S6 kinase (S6K) and serum-and glucocorticoid-induced protein kinase (SGK) interact with PDK1 upon phosphorylation of the HM site (6 -9). The phosphorylated HM binds to a HM-binding pocket in the catalytic core of PDK1 that was originally termed the PIF-binding pocket (6, 10). Besides its role in the docking of substrates to PDK1, the HM/PIF-binding pocket was also identified as a ubiquitous and key regulator...

No abstract