Key Points The presence of a mutation in SRSF2, SF3B1, U2AF1, ZRSR2, ASXL1, EZH2, BCOR, or STAG2 is highly specific for secondary AML. Secondary-type mutations define an s-AML–like disease within t-AML and elderly de novo AML that underlies clinical heterogeneity.

• First-line CPX-351 vs 713 control in newly diagnosed AML improves 60-day mortality, remission rate, and OS (HR 5 0.46, P 5 .01) in sAML subset.CPX-351 is a liposomal formulation of cytarabine:daunorubicin designed to deliver synergistic drug ratios to leukemia cells. In this phase 2 study, newly diagnosed older acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients were randomized 2:1 to first-line CPX-351 or 713 treatment. The goal was to determine efficacy and identify patient subgroups that may benefit from CPX-351 treatment. Response rate (complete remission 1 incomplete remission) was the primary end point, with event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) as secondary end points. The 126 patients entered were balanced for disease and patient-specific risk factors. Overall, CPX-351 produced higher response rates (66.7% vs 51.2%, P 5 .07), meeting predefined criteria for success (P < .1). Differences in EFS and OS were not statistically significant. A planned analysis of the secondary AML subgroup demonstrated an improved response rate (57.6% vs 31.6%, P 5 .06), and prolongation of EFS (hazard ratio [HR] 5 0.59, P 5 .08) and OS (HR 5 0.46, P 5 .01). Recovery from cytopenias was slower after CPX-351 (median days to absolute neutrophil count ‡1000: 36 vs 32; platelets >100 000: 37 vs 28) with more grade 3-4 infections but without increase in infection-related deaths (3.5% vs 7.3%) or 60-day mortality (4.7% vs 14.6%), indicating acceptable safety. These results suggest a clinical benefit with CPX-351, particularly among patients with secondary AML, and provide the rationale for a phase 3 trial currently underway in newly diagnosed secondary AML patients. This study is registered at Clinicaltrials. gov as #NCT00788892. (Blood. 2014;123(21):3239-3246)

Most lymphomas that involve the central nervous system are B-cell neoplasms that express the cell surface molecule CD20. After intravenous administration, rituximab can be reproducibly measured in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) in patients with primary central nervous system lymphoma; however, the CSF levels of rituximab are approximately 0.1% of serum levels associated with therapeutic activity in patients with systemic non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Because lymphomatous meningitis is a frequent complication of nonHodgkin lymphoma, we have conducted an analysis of the safety and pharmacokinetics of direct intrathecal administration of rituximab using cynomolgus monkeys. No significant acute or delayed toxicity, neurologic or otherwise, was detected. Pharmacokinetic analysis suggests that drug clearance from the CSF is biphasic, with a terminal half-life of 4.96 hours. A phase 1 study to investigate the safety and pharmacokinetics of intrathecal rituximab in patients with recurrent lymphomatous meningitis will be implemented based on these findings. ( IntroductionCentral nervous system (CNS) involvement is associated with an adverse outcome in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). 1 Most NHLs that involve the CNS are B-cell neoplasms that express CD20. 2 Dissemination within the leptomeninges represents a common pathway of progression in systemic NHL and primary CNS lymphoma and usually heralds neurologic deterioration and a fatal outcome. 3 Rituximab monoclonal antibody therapy is an effective treatment for B-cell NHL. [4][5][6][7] To date, preclinical and clinical practice involving rituximab has been limited to intravenous administration. This agent binds specifically to the antigen CD20, which is expressed on more than 90% of B-cell NHL and primary CNS lymphoma but is not expressed by normal neurons or glia in the brain.A number of preclinical models have demonstrated that therapeutic antibodies administered into the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) are able to concentrate in and eradicate tumors within the craniospinal axis with minimal toxicity. 8,9 The primate model of drug delivery into the CSF represents a valid experimental model for the prediction of CSF drug pharmacokinetics in humans. [10][11][12][13] This is the first preclinical analysis of the safety and pharmacokinetics of rituximab administration within the craniospinal axis. Study designAll experimental procedures have been reviewed and approved by the Committee on Human Research and by the Committee on Animal Research, University of California, San Francisco.Four female cynomolgus monkeys, aged 16 to 18 years, weighing 3 to 5 kg, were obtained from Biosurg (Winters, CA). A total of 7 experiments were performed with one monkey in each experiment. Data are reported from the 4 experiments that involved suboccipital administration of rituximab. Three experiments used an Ommaya reservoir (Integra NeuroCare, Plainsboro, NJ) in the right lateral ventricle. Although intra-Ommaya administration of rituximab resulted in high CSF concentrations, the size of the res...

Although serious toxicity may occur, the survival and response rates achieved with high-dose [(131)I]MIBG suggest its utility in the management of selected patients with metastatic PHEO and PGL.