Novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome virus (SARS‐CoV‐2) has become a global health care crisis. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) lists immunocompromised patients, including those requiring immunosuppression following renal transplantation, as high risk for severe disease from SARS‐CoV‐2. Treatment for other viral infections in renal transplant recipients often includes a reduction in immunosuppression; however, no current guidelines are available recommending the optimal approach to managing immunosuppression in the patients who are infected with SARS‐CoV‐2. It is currently advised to avoid corticosteroids in the treatment of SARS‐CoV‐2 outside of critically ill patients. Recently published cases describing inpatient care of COVID‐19 in renal transplant recipients differ widely in disease severity, time from transplantation, baseline immunosuppressive therapy, and the modifications made to immunosuppression during COVID‐19 treatment. This review summarizes and compares inpatient immunosuppressant management strategies of recently published reports in the renal transplant population infected with SARS‐CoV‐2 and discusses the limitations of corticosteroids in managing immunosuppression in this patient population.

We present a case of late initiation of remdesivir antiviral therapy in the successful treatment of a patient with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) in a mixed medical intensive care unit of a community teaching hospital. A previously healthy 40‐year‐old man was admitted to the hospital 3 days after the onset of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) symptoms including dry cough, fever, and shortness of breath progressing to intubation and increased mechanical ventilator support. A request for compassionate use remdesivir was submitted on the same hospital day as the positive COVID‐19 polymerase chain reaction result. Supportive measures, in addition to a 5‐day course of hydroxychloroquine, were maintained until remdesivir could be supplied on day 9 of hospitalization, 13 days after symptom onset. Sixty hours after initiating remdesivir, the patient was successfully extubated and able to transition to room air within 24 hours of extubation. Late initiation of remdesivir may be effective in treating SARS‐CoV‐2, unlike antivirals utilized for different disease states, such as oseltamivir, that are most effective when started as soon as possible following symptom onset. Urgent action is needed by regulatory agencies to work with drug manufacturers to expedite the study and approval of investigational agents targeting SARS‐CoV‐2 as well as to meet manufacturing demands.

Background Antibiotics are commonly prescribed to patients as they leave the hospital. We aimed to create a comprehensive metric to characterize antibiotic overuse after discharge among hospitalized patients treated for pneumonia or urinary tract infection (UTI) and determine whether overuse varied across hospitals and conditions. Methods In a retrospective cohort study of hospitalized patients treated for pneumonia or UTI in 46 hospitals between 7/1/2017-7/30/2019 we quantified the proportion of patients discharged with antibiotic overuse, defined as: unnecessary antibiotic use, excess antibiotic duration, or suboptimal fluoroquinolone use. Using linear regression, we assessed hospital-level association between antibiotic overuse after discharge in patients treated for pneumonia vs. UTI. Results Of 21,825 patients treated for infection (12,445 pneumonia; 9,380 UTI), nearly half (49.1%) had antibiotic overuse after discharge (56.9% pneumonia; 38.7% UTI). For pneumonia, 63.1% of overuse days after discharge were due to excess duration; for UTI, 43.9% were due to treatment of asymptomatic bacteriuria. The percentage of patients discharged with antibiotic overuse varied five-fold among hospitals (15.9% [95% CI: 8.7%-24.6%] to 80.6% [95% CI:69.4%-88.1%]) and was strongly correlated between conditions (regression coefficient=0.85, P&.001). Conclusion Antibiotic overuse after discharge was common and varied widely between hospitals. Antibiotic overuse after discharge was associated between conditions, suggesting that prescribing culture, physician behavior, or organizational processes contribute to overprescribing at discharge. Multifaceted efforts focusing on all three types of overuse and multiple conditions should be considered to improve antibiotic prescribing at discharge.

Background Many antibiotics prescribed in the outpatient setting result from upper respiratory tract infections (URTIs); however, these infections are often viral. Virtual visits have emerged as a popular alternative to office visits for URTIs and may be an important target for antimicrobial stewardship programs. Methods This retrospective cohort study evaluated adult patients diagnosed with sinusitis treated within a single primary care network. The primary objective was to compare guideline-concordant diagnosis between patients treated via virtual visits vs in-office visits. Guideline-concordant bacterial sinusitis diagnosis was based on national guideline recommendations. Secondary objectives included comparing guideline-concordant antibiotic prescribing between groups and 24-hour, 7-day, and 30-day revisits. Results A total of 350 patients were included in the study, with 175 in each group. Patients treated for sinusitis were more likely to receive a guideline-concordant diagnosis in the virtual visit group (69.1% vs 45.7%; P < .001). Additionally, patients who completed virtual visits were less likely to receive antibiotics (68.6% vs 94.3%; P < .001). Guideline-concordant antibiotic selection was similar between groups (67.5% vs 64.8%; P = .641). The median duration of therapy in both groups was 10 days (P = .88). Patients completing virtual visits were more likely to revisit for sinusitis within 24 hours (8% vs 1.7%; P = .006) and within 30 days (14.9% vs 7.4%; P = .027). Conclusions In adult patients presenting with sinusitis, care at a virtual visit was associated with an increase in guideline-concordant diagnosis and a decrease in antibiotic prescribing compared with in-office primary care visits. Virtual visit platforms may be a valuable tool for antimicrobial stewardship programs in the outpatient setting.

IntroductionAntimicrobial prescribing in the emergency department is predominantly empiric, with final microbiology results either unavailable or reported after most patients are discharged home. Systematic follow-up processes are needed to ensure appropriate antimicrobial therapy at this transition of care. The objective of this study was to assess the impact of a culture follow-up (CFU) program on the frequency of emergency department (ED) revisits within 72 h and hospital admissions within 30 days compared to the historical standard of care (SOC). Additionally, infection characteristics and antimicrobial therapy were compared.MethodsA single group, pre-test post-test quasi-experimental study was conducted comparing a retrospective SOC group to a prospective CFU group. CFU was implemented using computerized decision-support software and a multidisciplinary team of pharmacists and emergency physician staff.ResultsOver the four-month intervention period the CFU group evaluated 197 cultures and modified antimicrobial therapy in 25.5%. The rate of combined ED revisits within 72 h and hospital admissions within 30 days was 16.9% in the SOC group and 10.2% in the CFU group (p = 0.079). When evaluating the uninsured population alone, revisits to the ED within 72 h were reduced from 15.3% in the SOC group to 2.4% in the CFU group (p = 0.044).ConclusionImplementation of a multidisciplinary CFU program was associated with a reduction in ED revisits within 72 h and hospital admissions within 30 days. One-fourth of patients required post-discharge intervention, representing a large need for antimicrobial stewardship expansion to ED practice models.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s40121-014-0026-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.