Staphylococcus aureus is a common human pathogen with a variety of virulence factors, which can cause multiple infectious diseases. In recent decades, due to the constant evolution and the abuse of antibiotics, Staphylococcus aureus was becoming more resistant, the infection rate of MRSA remained high, and clinical treatment of MRSA became more difficult. The genetic diversity of MRSA was mainly represented by the continuous emergence of epidemic strains, resulting in the constant changes of epidemic clones. Different classes of MRSA resulted in different epidemics and resistance characteristics, which could affect the clinical symptoms and treatments. MRSA had also spread from traditional hospitals to community and livestock environments, and the new clones established a relationship between animals and humans, promoting further evolution of MRSA. Since the resistance mechanism of MRSA is very complex, it is important to clarify these resistance mechanisms at the molecular level for the treatment of infectious diseases. We firstly described the diversity of SCC mec elements, and discussed the types of SCC mec , its drug resistance mechanisms and expression regulations. Then, we described how the vanA operon makes Staphylococcus aureus resistant to vancomycin and its expression regulation. Finally, a brief introduction was given to the drug resistance mechanisms of biofilms and efflux pump systems. Analyzing the resistance mechanism of MRSA can help study new anti-infective drugs and alleviate the evolution of MRSA. At the end of the review, we summarized the treatment strategies for MRSA infection, including antibiotics, anti-biofilm agents and efflux pump inhibitors. To sum up, here we reviewed the epidemic characteristics of Staphylococcus aureus , summarized its classifications, drug resistance mechanisms of MRSA (SCC mec element, vanA operon, biofilm and active efflux pump system) and novel therapy strategies, so as to provide a theoretical basis for the treatment of MRSA infection.

Objective. This study aimed to compare the identification efficiency of metagenome next generation sequencing (mNGS) and traditional methods in detecting pathogens in patients with severe bacterial pneumonia (BP) and further analyze the drug resistance of common pathogens. Methods. A total of 180 patients with severe BP who were admitted to our hospital from June 2017 to July 2020 were selected as the research objects. Alveolar lavage fluid from the patients were collected, and pathogens were detected by the mNGS technology and traditional etiological detection technology. Common pathogens detected by mNGS were tested for the drug sensitivity test. The difference between mNGS and traditional detection method in the identification of pathogenic bacteria in severe BP patients was compared, and the distribution characteristics and drug resistance of pathogenic bacteria were analyzed. Results. The positive rate of mNGS detection was 92.22%, which was significantly higher than that of the traditional culture method (58.33%, P < 0.05 ). 347 strains of pathogenic bacteria were detected by mNGS, including 256 strains of Gram-negative bacteria (G−), 89 strains of Gram-positive bacteria (G+), and 2 strains of fungi. Among G− bacteria, Acinetobacter baumannii had higher resistance to piperacillin/tazobactam, ceftazidime, imipenem, levofloxacin, amikacin, ciprofloxacin, gentamicin, and the lowest resistance to tigecycline. The resistance of Klebsiella pneumoniae to piperacillin/tazobactam and ceftazidime was higher. Pseudomonas aeruginosa had low resistance to all the drugs. Escherichia coli had high drug resistance to most drugs, and the drug resistant rates to cefoperazone/sulbactam, piperacillin/tazobactam, ceftazidime, imipenem, and gentamicin were all more than 50.00%. G+ bacteria had high resistance to penicillin, azithromycin, amoxicillin and levofloxacin, and amoxicillin and levofloxacin had high resistance, up to 100.00%. Conclusion. mNGS has high sensitivity for the identification of pathogenic bacteria in patients with BP. G− bacteria were the main pathogens of BP, but both G− and G+ bacteria had high resistance to a variety of antibacterial drugs.