BackgroundParietal fibrinous peritonitis (PFP) and generalised peritonitis (GP) are two postoperative complications in cows, characterised by fluid and fibrin accumulation throughout the peritoneum (GP) or in an encapsulated cavity (PFP). Unlike GP, PFP is scarcely documented.MethodsTwenty-one GP cases and 12 PFP cases were confirmed by ultrasound in cows referred to the Veterinary Clinic (Liège University) for complications after caesarean section. All cows underwent a standardised examination protocol. Blood samples were analysed for metabolic and inflammatory markers. Bacteriology was performed on peritoneal fluid samples. Treatment consisted of surgical drainage of the abdominal cavity (GP) or the encapsulated cavity (PFP). Variables concerning anamnesis, clinical findings and treatment outcomes were compared.ResultsPerioperative complications had occurred in 9/21 GP cows but 0/12 PFP cows (P<0.05). Biochemical analysis indicated pronounced inflammation and did not differ between groups. Peritoneal fluid samples of both groups were contaminated and contained similar bacteria (Trueperella pyogenes and Escherichia coli). While 11/12 PFP cows were discharged, all patients with GP died or were euthanased (P<0.05).ConclusionsWe hypothesise that PFP and GP are two different manifestations of perioperative peritoneal contamination. The severity and spread of the contamination determine the clinical presentation and the prognosis.
BackgroundNonendoscopic bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) is a practical alternative for a deep nasopharyngeal swab (DNS) to sample the airways of a large number of calves in a short period of time. The extent of commensal overgrowth and agreement of BAL with DNS culture results in preweaned calves are unknown.ObjectivesTo compare commensal overgrowth and bacterial culture results between DNS and BAL samples.AnimalsA total of 183 preweaned calves (144 with bovine respiratory disease and 39 healthy animals).MethodsCross‐sectional study. Deep nasopharyngeal swab and BAL samples were taken from each calf and cultured to detect Pasteurellaceae and Mycoplasma bovis. Agreement and associations between culture results of DNS and BAL samples were determined by kappa statistics and logistic regression.ResultsBronchoalveolar lavage samples were less often polymicrobial, more frequently negative and yielded more pure cultures compared to DNS, leading to a clinically interpretable culture result in 79.2% of the cases compared to only in 31.2% of the DNS samples. Isolation rates were lower in healthy animals, but not different between DNS and BAL samples. Only Histophilus somni was more likely to be isolated from BAL samples. In clinical cases, a polymicrobial DNS culture result did not increase the probability of a polymicrobial BAL result by ≥30%, nor did it influence the probability of a negative culture. A significant herd effect was noted for all observed relationships.Conclusions and Clinical RelevanceNonendoscopic BAL samples are far less overgrown by bacteria compared to DNS samples under the conditions of this study, facilitating clinical interpretation and resulting in a higher return on investment in bacteriologic culturing.
Running head: Mycoplasma bovis seromas in cattle
Mycoplasma bovis is an important cause of pneumonia and mastitis in cattle throughout the world, often reported as emerging. In absence of an effective vaccine for M. bovis, current prevention and control strategies rely on the identification of risk factors for within- and between-herd spread. The objective of this study was to determine the prevalence of M. bovis in Belgian dairy herds and to identify risk factors associated with a positive PCR or antibody ELISA bulk tank milk (BTM) test. A cross-sectional study was performed in 2016 on 100 dairy farms, analyzing BTM using PCR and antibody ELISA. Information on herd-level risk factors focusing on biosecurity and management were collected through a questionnaire and sourced from the national herd identification system (SANITRACE, Animal Health Service Flanders). Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify herd-level risk factors for the presence of M. bovis DNA and antibodies in BTM. The apparent prevalence on BTM was 7 and 17% for PCR and antibody ELISA, respectively. The true prevalence was 7.1% [95% confidence interval (CI) = 2.1-11.5%] and 24.8% (95% CI = 16.4-33.2%). There was no overlap between ELISA- and PCR-positive farms, resulting in a combined true prevalence of 31.8% of the Belgian farms being in recent contact with M. bovis. Risk factor analysis showed that herds with a breeding bull [M. bovis-positive results for 45.5 and 13.6% of herds with and without a bull, respectively, odds ratio = 4.7 (95% CI = 1.1-19.8)] and without a calving pen [M. bovis-positive result in 52.4 and 20.6% of the herds without and with a calving pen, respectively, odds ratio = 3.7 (95% CI = 1.06-12.5)] had higher odds to harbor M. bovis antigen or antibodies in BTM. In conclusion, the present study points to a several fold increase in the prevalence of M. bovis in Belgian dairy herds. The importance of the breeding bull and calving pen in the between- and within-herd spread of M. bovis might have been underestimated in the past. Focusing on these factors might contribute to more effective control programs in the future.
Mycoplasma bovis is an important pathogen causing mostly pneumonia in calves and mastitis in dairy cattle. In the absence of an effective vaccine, antimicrobial therapy remains the main control measure. Antimicrobial use in veal calves is substantially higher than in conventional herds, but whether veal calves also harbor more resistant M. bovis strains is currently unknown. Therefore, we compared antimicrobial susceptibility test results of M. bovis isolates from different cattle sectors and genomic clusters. The minimum inhibitory concentration of nine antimicrobials was determined for 141 Belgian M. bovis isolates (29 dairy, 69 beef, 12 mixed, 31 veal farms), and was used to estimate the epidemiological cut-off. Acquired resistance was frequently observed for the macrolides, while no acquired resistance to oxytetracycline and doxycycline, minimal acquired resistance to florfenicol and tiamulin, and a limited acquired resistance to enrofloxacin was seen. M. bovis isolates from beef cattle or genomic cluster III had higher odds of being gamithromycin-resistant than those from dairy cattle or genomic clusters IV and V. In this study, no cattle industry could be identified as source of resistant M. bovis strains. A single guideline for antimicrobial use for M. bovis infections, with a small remark for gamithromycin, is likely sufficient.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.