IMPORTANCE Evaluating corneal morphologic characteristics with corneal tomographic scans before refractive surgery is necessary to exclude patients with at-risk corneas and keratoconus. In previous studies, researchers performed screening with machine learning methods based on specific corneal parameters. To date, a deep learning algorithm has not been used in combination with corneal tomographic scans.OBJECTIVE To examine the use of a deep learning model in the screening of candidates for refractive surgery.
PurposeTo compare best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central macular thickness (CMT) after 532-nm subthreshold laser grid photocoagulation and threshold laser grid photocoagulation for the treatment of diabetic macular oedema (DME).Patients and methodsTwenty-three patients (46 eyes) with binocular DME were enroled in this study. The two eyes of each patient were divided into a subthreshold photocoagulation group and a threshold photocoagulation group. The eyes of the subthreshold group underwent 532-nm patter scan laser system (PASCAL) 50% end point subthreshold laser grid photocoagulation therapy, whereas the threshold photocoagulation group underwent short-pulse grid photocoagulation with a 532-nm PASCAL system. BCVA and CMT were assessed in all patients before treatment, 7 days after treatment, and 1, 3, and 6 months after treatment.ResultsAfter grid photocoagulation, the mean BCVA improved in both the subthreshold group, and the threshold group, and the two groups did not differ statistically significantly from each other. Similarly, the macular oedema diminished in both groups after treatment, and the two groups did not differ statistically significantly from each other with regard to CMT.ConclusionBoth 532-nm subthreshold laser grid photocoagulation and threshold laser grid photocoagulation can improve the visual acuity and reduce CMT in DME patients.
PURPOSE: To comparatively investigate the clinical outcomes of small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) surgery with or without cyclotorsion compensation for the correction of myopic astigmatism. METHODS: This prospective, double-blinded, randomized controlled trial included patients who underwent SMILE surgery with bilateral myopic astigmatism. Two eyes of a single patient were randomly divided into the static cyclotorsion compensation (SCC) group and the control group. In the SCC group, the intraoperative cyclotorsion was manually compensated with a novel technique. In the control group, the cyclotorsion was not compensated. Visual acuity, manifest refraction, aberrations, objective visual quality, and contrast sensitivity were measured preoperatively and postoperatively. RESULTS: A total of 132 eyes from 66 patients were analyzed at the 3-month follow-up. The mean preoperative cylinder values in the SCC and control groups were −1.52 ± 0.81 and −1.57 ± 0.82 diopters (D), respectively. The mean cyclotorsion during surgery was 0.60° ± 0.63° (range: 0° to 3.2°) in the SCC group and 3.21° ± 2.33° (range: 0.1° to 10.8°) in the control group ( P < .001). Both groups showed favorable results in the correction of myopic astigmatism. No statistically significant difference was found between the two groups in visual and refractive outcomes, vector parameters, entire eye aberrations, objective visual quality, or contrast sensitivity. No significant benefit was gained from cyclotorsion compensation, even in the high astigmatism subgroup. CONCLUSIONS: The cyclotorsion compensation technique used in this study helped minimize the alignment error but was not compulsory because the ocular rotation in SMILE surgery using a well-controlled position was too small to affect the astigmatic outcomes or postoperative visual quality. [ J Refract Surg . 2019;35(5):301–308.]
The advent of “flapless” small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE), employing all-in-one technology, has resulted in a revolutionary breakthrough in refractive surgeries. SMILE has been gaining popularity due to fewer potential complications, such as postoperative dry eyes and greater biomechanical stability, etc. However, attention must be given to 1) the centration on the corneal vertex, 2) the proper alignment of the astigmatic axis, and 3) the relationship between pupil size and treatment diameter, to achieve good SMILE results. There is no pupil-tracking system to ascertain the accuracy of centration during the SMILE surgery. To improve the centration accuracy, our center uses two corneal topographers (Pentacam and Sirius) to measure and determine corneal vertex. Proper predicted optical zone diameter is not clearly defined yet in SMILE. Some scholars insist that mesopic pupil size should be taken into consideration when setting the predicted optical zone. Meanwhile, the issue of “functional optical zone” still has many unresolved issues and warrants further studies.
Purpose: To evaluate the outcomes of 4 low laser energy levels after small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) surgery. Setting: Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Guangzhou, China. Design: Prospective randomized clinical trial. Methods: This study evaluated consecutive patients who had SMILE to correct myopia or myopia with astigmatism. Eyes were placed into groups based on the laser energy used during surgery (ie, 105 nJ, 110 nJ, 115 nJ, or 120 nJ). All patients had a thorough ophthalmic examination preoperative and at 4 timepoints over 3 months postoperatively. Black areas and surface regularity of the extracted lenticules were observed and evaluated qualitatively and quantitatively. Results: The study comprised 124 eyes of 62 patients (40 women, 22 men), with 31 eyes in each laser energy group. The incidence of black areas was 45.16% (14 of 31 eyes), 12.90% (4 of 31 eyes), 16.13% (5 of 31 eyes), and 12.90% (4 of 31 eyes) for 105 nJ, 110 nJ, 115 nJ, and 120 nJ, respectively. The mean time for lenticule creation was the longest in the 105 nJ group (P = .015). The greatest increase in corneal thickness postoperatively occurred with 105 nJ (P < .05). Regression was highest in the 105 nJ group at 3 months (P < .01). However, corneal horizontal coma (C8) was lowest in the 105 nJ group at 1 week (P = .032). The lenticular surface in the 110 nJ group was the smoothest (P = .011). All contrast sensitivity values varied with time and recovered to preoperative levels by 1 week or 1 month. In all eyes, the uncorrected distance visual acuity and corrected distance visual acuity were good, with no statistically significant differences between the 4 energy groups. Conclusions: The 105 nJ group, in which the lowest energy was used, had the highest risk for black areas, serious postoperative corneal edema, and a significant healing response.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.