This study aimed to assess the effects of different anthropometric indices and their changes on the risk of incident dyslipidemia among the Chinese population. From the Guizhou population health cohort study, 2989 Chinese adults without dyslipidemia at baseline were followed up. Anthropometric parameters including waist circumference (WC), body mass index (BMI), waist-to-height ratio (WHtR), and their changes in the latter two indices, and serum lipids were tested after at least 8 h fasting. Hazard ratio (HR), adjusted hazard ratio (aHR), and 95% confidential interval (CI) were calculated to estimate the association between anthropometric parameters and dyslipidemia risk using multivariate Cox regression. A total of 2089 (69.98%) new dyslipidemia cases were identified over an average follow-up of 7.0 years. Baseline BMI (aHR = 1.12, 95%CI 1.01, 1.23) and WHtR (aHR = 1.06, 95%CI 1.00, 1.13) were positively associated with higher risks of incident dyslipidemia but not WC. Each 5.0 kg/m2 increment of BMI or 0.05-unit increment of WHtR was significantly associated with 43% or 25% increased risk of incident dyslipidemia, respectively. The aHRs (95%CI) of incident dyslipidemia for subjects maintaining or developing general obesity were 2.19 (1.53, 3.12) or 1.46 (1.22, 1.75), and 1.54 (1.23, 1.82) or 1.30 (1.06, 1.60) for subjects maintaining or developing abdominal obesity, respectively. Linear trends for aHRs of BMI, WHtR change, and BMI change were observed (p for trend: 0.021, <0.001, <0.001, respectively). BMI, WHtR, and their changes were closely associated with the incidence of dyslipidemia for Chinese adults. Loss in BMI and WHtR had protective effects on incident dyslipidemia, whereas gain of BMI or WHtR increased the dyslipidemia risk. Interventions to control or reduce BMI and WHtR to the normal range are important for the early prevention of dyslipidemia, especially for participants aged 40 years or above, male participants, and urban residents with poor control of obesity.
ObjectivesThis study aims to explore the long-term trend of fasting blood glucose (FBG) among urban patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and the impacts of the Chinese Spring Festival on their glycemic control in urban China.MethodsThe general information and longitudinal monitoring data of patients with T2DM in Minhang District, Shanghai China from 15 December 2006 to 31 December 2015 were collected. The FBG records were grouped into three periods, namely, the preholiday period (2 months right before the Chinese Spring Festival), the holiday period (from 28 December to 7 January of the lunar calendar year), and the postholiday period (2 months after the Chinese Spring Festival). The Mann-Kendall trend test and Cochran-Armitage trend test were occupied to explore the long-term trend, and paired t-test and chi-square (χ2) test were used to determine the differences in glycemic level and control rate between the preholiday and postholiday periods, respectively.ResultsFrom 2007 to 2015, the glycemic control rate in patients with T2DM showed an upward trend (P < 0.001), and the FBG level showed a decreasing trend (P = 0.048). After the Chinese Spring Festival, the glycemic control rate decreased significantly (P < 0.001), and the FBG level increased significantly (P < 0.001) compared to those during the preholiday period. The incidence of hypoglycemia increased during holidays. Patients who were aged 60–69 years, overweight or obese, with hypertension, with a disease duration of <3 years, or with poor glycemic control in one previous year were more likely to be affected by the holiday.ConclusionChinese Spring Festival is a key point for glycemic control of patients with T2DM in China. Intensive holiday-specific diabetic healthcare needs to be further improved, and community-based interventions should be developed and implemented to control the possible holiday effects.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.