ObjectiveTo assess the safety and tolerability of a modified Atkins diet (KDMAD), a type of ketogenic diet (KD), in subjects with relapsing MS while exploring potential benefits of KDs in MS.MethodsTwenty subjects with relapsing MS enrolled into a 6-month, single-arm, open-label study of the KDMAD. Adherence to KDMAD was objectively monitored by daily urine ketone testing. Fatigue and depression scores and fasting adipokines were obtained at baseline and on diet. Brain MRI was obtained at baseline and 6 months. Intention to treat was used for primary data analysis, and a per-protocol approach was used for secondary analysis.ResultsNo subject experienced worsening disease on diet. Nineteen subjects (95%) adhered to KDMAD for 3 months and 15 (75%) adhered for 6 months. Anthropometric improvements were noted on KDMAD, with reductions in body mass index and total fat mass (p < 0.0001). Fatigue (p = 0.002) and depression scores (p = 0.003) were improved. Serologic leptin was significantly lower at 3 months (p < 0.0001) on diet.ConclusionsKDMAD is safe, feasible to study, and well tolerated in subjects with relapsing MS. KDMAD improves fatigue and depression while also promoting weight loss and reducing serologic proinflammatory adipokines.Classification of evidenceThe study is rated Class IV because of the absence of a non-KD control group.
Background Untreated or undertreated burns are commonly encountered by plastic surgeons on medical trips in India and represent a major cause of disability. We sought to utilize validated patient-reported outcomes instruments to identify the patient population with the greatest burn-related disability in order to appropriately allocate plastic surgery resources to those in greatest need. Methods The Quick Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand, RAND 36-Item Short Form Health Survey, and Burn-Specific Health Scale–Revised, Brief, and Adapted questionnaires were administered via an interpreter during a plastic surgery trip to Jharkhand, India, in January 2018. Demographics, comorbidities, and burn-specific history were recorded. Results Twenty-eight postburn patients were surveyed (mean age, 17.0 ± 9.2 years; male:female ratio, 1:2.5). Mean time from injury was 4.74 years. No patient had received formal, primary burn care. Mechanism of injury: flame (39%), oil (32%), scalding water (14%), and other (14%). Fifty-four percent were extremity burns; 25%, facial; and 18%, neck burns. The Burn-Specific Health Scale–Revised, Brief, and Adapted demonstrated that the most significantly impacted domains for all patients were body image and skin sensitivity, with more than 80% of patients complaining of issues with skin sensitivity. In addition, children (aged <18 years) had diminished body image domain scores. RAND SF-36 scores were lowest in the energy (73.1 ± 25.0) and general health (76.5 ± 13.8) domains, and females with extremity burns demonstrated statistically significant decreases in their physical limitation domain scores (85.9 ± 17.3, P < 0.05). Females with extremity burns also had statistically significant lower scores in the energy domain (64.09 ± 25.75) as compared with their male counterparts with extremity burns (100 ± 0, P = 0.045). In general, females scored lower than did males in multiple domains, and those results reached statistical significance in the energy (65.9 ± 24.6 vs 93.6 ± 10.9), emotional (77.2 ± 21.5 vs 95.4 ± 11.2), and general health domains (71.1 ± 11.9 vs 90.0 ± 7.5) with P < 0.05. Children demonstrated significantly diminished scores in the emotional (75.5 ± 24.6) and general health (79.1 ± 11.8) domains. Conclusion These data demonstrate the significant impact on quality of life that untreated burns have in this population. Male and female children with extremity burns and adult women with extremity burns were most significantly affected in multiple domains. Consequently, children and adult women with extremity burns appear to be the patient cohort with the greatest opportunity to impact their quality of life. These data may be utilized to improve patient triage and resource allocation for future surgical trips but could also be of significant benefit to internal health agencies and ministries for the same purpose.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.