Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text

This single-center prospective clinical trial evaluated the combination of nivolumab plus bendamustine (NB) as a salvage regimen in classical Hodgkin lymphoma patients after failure of nivolumab monotherapy. A total of 30 patients received nivolumab (3 mg/kg) on D1,14 and bendamustine (90 mg/m2) on D1, 2 of a 28-day cycle for up to 3 cycles. The ORR was 87% with 57% CR, 30% PR. With median follow-up of 25 months, the estimated 2-year OS was 96,7% (95% CI, 90.2%–100%), PFS was 23,3% (95% CI, 8.2%–38.4%) median PFS was 10.2 months (95% CI, 7.7–14.2 months) with median DOR 6.6 months (95% CI 3.9–11.6 months). Ten patients (33.3%) experienced grade 3 to 4 AE during therapy. Infections were most common AEs of the combined therapy. NB was a highly efficient salvage regimen in relapsed/refractory cHL with a manageable toxicity profile and modest potential for achievement of long-term remission. Registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov (#NCT0334365).

To date, the impact of the tumor microenvironment on the prognosis of patients with classic Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) during anti-PD-1 therapy has been studied insufficiently. This retrospective study included 61 primary samples of lymph nodes from patients who had relapsed/refractory (r/r) cHL and were treated with nivolumab. Repeated samples were obtained in 15 patients at relapse or disease progression after immunotherapy. Median follow-up was 55 (13–63) months. The best overall response rate and progression-free survival (PFS) were analyzed depending on the expression of CD68, CD163, PD-1, LAG-3, TIM-3, CTLA-4, TIGIT, CD163/c-maf in the tumor microenvironment in primary and sequential biopsies. The combination of CD163/c-maf antibodies was used for the identification of M2 macrophages (M2). A low number of macrophages in primary samples was associated with inferior PFS during nivolumab treatment (for CD163-positive cells p = 0.0086; for CD68-positive cells p = 0.037), while a low number of M2 with higher PFS (p = 0.014). Complete response was associated with a lower level of M2 (p = 0.011). In sequential samples (before and after nivolumab therapy) an increase in PD-1 (p = 0.011) and LAG-3 (p = 0.0045) and a depletion of CD68 (p = 0.057) and CD163 (p = 0.0049)-positive cells were observed. The study expands understanding of the cHL microenvironment structure and dynamics during nivolumab therapy in patients with r/r cHL.

No abstract

Objectives Therapy of patients with relapsed and refractory classic Hodgkin lymphoma (r/r cHL) after PD-1 inhibitors failure remains an unresolved issue. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the combination of nivolumab with brentuximab vedotin (Nivo + BV) after nivolumab monotherapy failure. Methods This study retrospectively analyzed 21 patients with r/r cHL who were treated with the combination of Nivo + BV after Nivo failure. The response was evaluated by PET-CT scan according to the LYRIC criteria. Adverse events (AEs) were assessed according to NCI CTCAE v.4.03. Results Median follow-up was 19 (9-47) months. The ORR was 57%. The median OS was not reached, 24 month OS was 80% (95% CI 50-93%). Median PFS was 12 months with 24 month PFS of 31% (95% CI 12-53%). Any grade AEs were observed in 12 patients (63%), 3-4 grade AEs in 2 patients (10%). Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) after Nivo + BV was performed in 8 (38%) patients. The median time between Nivo + BV and allo-HSCT was 8 (5-21) months. Conclusions Combination of Nivo + BV in r/r cHL after nivolumab monotherapy failure is potentially an effective and safe approach.