For young patients with high-risk CLL, BTK-/PI3K-inhibitors or allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloHCT) are considered. Patients with a low risk of non-relapse mortality (NRM) but a high risk of failure of targeted therapy may benefit most from alloHCT. We performed Cox regression analyses to identify risk factors for 2-year NRM and 5-year event-free survival (using EFS as a surrogate for long-term disease control) in a large, updated EBMT registry cohort (n= 694). For the whole cohort, 2-year NRM was 28% and 5-year EFS 37%. Higher age, lower performance status, unrelated donor type and unfavorable sex-mismatch had a significant adverse impact on 2-year NRM. Two-year NRM was calculated for good- and poor-risk reference patients. Predicted 2-year-NRM was 11 and 12% for male and female good-risk patients compared with 42 and 33% for male and female poor-risk patients. For 5-year EFS, age, performance status, prior autologous HCT, remission status and sex-mismatch had a significant impact, whereas del(17p) did not. The model-based prediction of 5-year EFS was 55% and 64%, respectively, for male and female good-risk patients. Good-risk transplant candidates with high-risk CLL and limited prognosis either on or after failure of targeted therapy should still be considered for alloHCT.

Burkitt lymphoma is an aggressive B cell malignancy accounting for 1–2% of all adult lymphomas. Treatment with dose-intensive, multi-agent chemotherapy is effective but associated with considerable toxicity. In this observational study, we compared real-world efficacy, toxicity, and costs of four frequently employed treatment strategies for Burkitt lymphoma: the Lymphome Malins B (LMB), the Berlin-Frankfurt-Münster (BFM), the HOVON, and the CODOX-M/IVAC regimens. We collected data from 147 adult patients treated in eight referral centers. Following central pathology assessment, 105 of these cases were accepted as Burkitt lymphoma, resulting in the following treatment groups: LMB 36 patients, BFM 19 patients, HOVON 29 patients, and CODOX-M/IVAC 21 patients (median age 39 years, range 14–74; mean duration of follow-up 47 months). There was no significant difference between age, sex ratio, disease stage, or percentage HIV-positive patients between the treatment groups. Five-year progression-free survival (69%, p = 0.966) and 5-year overall survival (69%, p = 0.981) were comparable for all treatment groups. Treatment-related toxicity was also comparable with only hepatotoxicity seen more frequently in the CODOX/M-IVAC group (p = 0.004). Costs were determined by the number of rituximab gifts and the number of inpatients days. Overall, CODOX-M/IVAC had the most beneficial profile with regards to costs, treatment duration, and percentage of patients completing planned treatment. We conclude that the four treatment protocols for Burkitt lymphoma yield nearly identical results with regards to efficacy and safety but differ in treatment duration and costs. These differences may help guide future choice of treatment.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (10.1007/s00277-017-3167-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

The prognosis of adult patients with ALL remains unsatisfactory. AlloSCT is associated with a beneficial GVL response mediated by donor T cells. However, GVHD results in substantial mortality and long-term morbidity. T-cell depletion (TCD) of the graft reduces the severity of GVHD, but is associated with an increased relapse rate after alloSCT. Therefore, early sequential donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) is likely to be necessary for a successful GVL reaction. Twenty-five adult ALL patients (10 Ph þ ALL) were eligible for early DLI after initial disease control with myeloablative TCD-alloSCT in first CR (CR1), if active GVHD was absent at 3-6 months after alloSCT. Patients with a sibling donor or an unrelated donor were scheduled for 3.0 Â 10 6 CD3 þ cells/kg or 1.5 Â 10 6 CD3 þ cells/kg, respectively, at 6 months after alloSCT. Three patients died before evaluation (one early relapse). Five patients had active GVHD. Fourteen of the remaining seventeen patients received DLI (median time-to-DLI: 185 days). Overall, only 17% required long-term systemic immunosuppression for GVHD. With a median follow-up after TCD-alloSCT of 50 months, 2-year survival probability was 68% (95% confidence interval (CI) 49-87%). In conclusion, myeloablative TCD-alloSCT with early sequential DLI is an efficient and safe post-remission treatment for adult ALL patients in CR1.

No abstract

No abstract