Lipid accumulation in muscle is associated with diminished insulin sensitivity. It was hypothesized that resistance exercise decreases muscular adipose tissue and reduces the level of retinol-binding protein-4 (RBP4), which is linked to adipose tissue and insulin sensitivity in diabetics. Forty-four women with type 2 diabetes were randomly assigned to three groups for a period of 12 weeks: control (asked to maintain a sedentary lifestyle); resistance exercise (elastic band exercise at moderate intensity five times per week); and aerobic exercise (walking for 60 min at moderate intensity five times per week). Subcutaneous (SCAT), subfascial (SFAT) and intramuscular (IMAT) adipose tissuesat mid-thigh level were assessed using computed tomography, and RBP4 level and insulin sensitivity (fractional disappearance rate of insulin, k ITT ) were assessed before and after intervention. Changes in SCAT, SFAT, IMAT, RBP4 and k ITT were similar among the three groups. Within-group analysis revealed that body mass index and waist circumference decreased significantly in both exercise groups, but RBP4 decreased significantly only with resistance exercise. Resistance exercise did not alter muscular adipose tissue or improve insulin sensitivity.

Dapagliflozin 5 or 10 mg as add-on to metformin was well tolerated in Asian patients with T2D and significantly improved glycemic control with the additional benefit of weight reduction.

This study showed the efficacy and safety of gemigliptin 50 mg administered once daily as a monotherapy for type 2 diabetes patients.

AimsTo assess the effects on glycaemic control of lixisenatide vs placebo as add‐on treatment to basal insulin (BI) ± metformin and effects on glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) reduction in patients with insufficiently controlled type 2 diabetes (T2D).MethodsPatients (n = 448) with inadequately controlled T2D were randomized (1:1) to lixisenatide or placebo as add‐on to BI ± metformin for 24 weeks after an 8‐week run‐in phase, during which BI was titrated to a target self‐monitored plasma glucose (SMPG; 4.4‐5.6 mmol/L). The primary endpoint was absolute change in HbA1c from baseline to week 24. Secondary efficacy endpoints included: percentage of responders; changes in 2‐hour postprandial plasma glucose (PPG); 7‐point SMPG (daily average); body weight (BW); total daily BI dose; fasting plasma glucose; and safety assessments.ResultsBaseline demographics were similar in the two treatment groups. After insulin optimization during run‐in, lixisenatide was superior to placebo in mean change from baseline (7.9% [standard deviation {s.d.}, 0.66] and 7.9% [0.70], respectively) to week 24 in HbA1c (least squares mean [standard error {s.e.}] change −0.62% [0.09] vs −0.11% [0.09]; P < .0001, respectively) and higher proportions of patients achieved HbA1c targets. Two‐hour PPG, daily mean SMPG and mean BW were reduced further and daily BI dose was lower with lixisenatide than placebo (−1.12 kg vs 0.04 kg [P < .0001]; −3.0 U vs −1.9 U [P = .0033], respectively). Treatment‐emergent adverse events were greater with lixisenatide than placebo (63.8% vs 40.8%, respectively). The incidence of symptomatic hypoglycaemia was similar (lixisenatide 15.6% vs placebo 13.5%).ConclusionsIn Asian patients insufficiently controlled on BI ± metformin, lixisenatide was superior to placebo in glycaemic control, with a tolerability profile in line with other glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonists.Clinical trial numberNCT01632163 (clinicaltrials.gov).

In patients with residual hypertriglyceridemia despite statin treatment, a combination of ω-3 fatty acids and rosuvastatin produced a greater reduction of TGs and non-HDL-C than rosuvastatin alone. Further study is needed to determine whether the advantages of this lipid profile of ω-3 fatty acids actually leads to the prevention of cardiovascular event. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03026933.