Objectives: The authors investigated whether models using time series methods can generate accurate short-term forecasts of emergency department (ED) bed occupancy, using traditional historical averages models as comparison.Methods: From July 2005 through June 2006, retrospective hourly ED bed occupancy values were collected from three tertiary care hospitals. Three models of ED bed occupancy were developed for each site: 1) hourly historical average, 2) seasonal autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA), and 3) sinusoidal with an autoregression (AR)-structured error term. Goodness of fits were compared using log likelihood and Akaike's Information Criterion (AIC). The accuracies of 4-and 12-hour forecasts were evaluated by comparing model forecasts to actual observed bed occupancy with root mean square (RMS) error. Sensitivity of prediction errors to model training time was evaluated, as well. Results:The seasonal ARIMA outperformed the historical average in complexity adjusted goodness of fit (AIC). Both AR-based models had significantly better forecast accuracy for the 4-and the 12-hour forecasts of ED bed occupancy (analysis of variance [ANOVA] p < 0.01), compared to the historical average. The AR-based models did not differ significantly from each other in their performance. Model prediction errors did not show appreciable sensitivity to model training times greater than 7 days.Conclusions: Both a sinusoidal model with AR-structured error term and a seasonal ARIMA model were found to robustly forecast ED bed occupancy 4 and 12 hours in advance at three different EDs, without needing data input beyond bed occupancy in the preceding hours. ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE 2009; 16:301-308 ª 2009 by the Society for Academic Emergency MedicineKeywords: crowding, forecasting, emergency service, hospital, operations research E mergency department (ED) overcrowding has become a significant problem throughout the United States, leading to possible increased health care costs, causing raised stress levels among staff and patients in EDs, and most importantly, adversely affecting patient outcomes. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9] One aspect of the problem is the difficulty of anticipating the timing and magnitude of overcrowded conditions. The ability to predict crowded conditions, especially hour by hour, could substantially impact ED operations. To this end, we evaluate how time series-based models perform in short-term forecasting of ED occupancy.Traditionally, ED operations directors have found historical averages to be reliable and accurate for longterm forecasts of ED behavior. For example, a director might use the average ED bed occupancy on Monday evenings at 21:00 over the past 2 years to determine how many staff should be working in the ED at that time. However, short-term forecasting of ED bed occupancy, such as might be useful for calling in additional staff or opening up hospital beds, is likely to need more accurate forecasting techniques.Several authors have looked to time series techniques, such ...
Sterilization, male and female combined, is the most common use of contraception in the United States. Despite the lower risk, higher cost-efficacy, and high efficacy of vasectomy compared with female sterilization, more US women rely on female sterilization than male sterilization. Reasons for low use of vasectomy include lack of knowledge and misconceptions about the procedure, lack of access, provider bias, and patient preferences. This article will provide a basic overview of male and female sterilization, an exploration of vasectomy barriers, and ways obstetrician-gynecologists can increase vasectomy uptake including regular recommendation of vasectomy to patients in long-term committed relationships considering sterilization.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.