BackgroundEnteric fever is an important public health problem in Nepal. Due to emergence of multidrug resistant strains of Salmonella spp. the conventional first-line drugs, ampicillin, chloramphenicol, and cotrimoxazole have not been used as empiric therapy for treatment of enteric fever for last two decades and there have been increased uses of fluoroquinolones as the drugs of choice. The aim of this study was to evaluate and analyze the antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of Salmonella spp.MethodsA total of 620 blood samples collected from the patients suspected of suffering from enteric fever were cultured using standard microbiological techniques. Antibiotic susceptibility testing of the Salmonella spp., was performed by Kirby Bauer disc diffusion technique following Clinical and Laboratory Standard Institute (CLSI) guidelines. Minimum inhibitory concentrations of ciprofloxacin, ofloxacin and nalidixic acid were determined by agar dilution method.ResultsOf the total 83 Salmonella spp., 48 (57.83 %) were S. Typhi and 35 (42.26 %) were S. Paratyphi A. Among 83 Salmonella isolates, 98.8 % of the Salmonella spp. were susceptible to chloramphenicol and co-trimoxazole and about 97.6 % of the isolates were susceptible to ampicillin. Similarly, 69 (83.13 %) isolates were resistant to nalidixic acid. Only 16.9 % of the isolates were susceptible to ciprofloxacin. One S. Typhi isolate was multidrug resistant.ConclusionThe present study revealed the decreased susceptibility of the S. Typhi and S. Paratyphi A to fluoroquinolones, proving them to be inappropriate for empirical therapy for the treatment of enteric fever in our setting. Further the higher susceptibility of the isolates to first line drugs, ampicillin, chloramphenicol, and cotrimoxazole suggests the possibility of using these drugs for empirical therapy.

BackgroundMethicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) has evolved as a serious threat to public health. It has capability to cause infections not only in health care settings but also in community. Due to the multidrug resistance shown by MRSA, there are limited treatment options for the infections caused by this superbug. Vancomycin is used as the drug of choice for the treatment of infections caused by MRSA. Different studies from all around the world have documented the emergence of strains of S. aureus those are intermediate sensitive or resistant to vancomycin. And recently, there have been reports of reduced susceptibility of MRSA to vancomycin, from Nepal also. So the main purpose of this study was to determine the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of vancomycin to methicillin resistant S. aureus isolated from different clinical specimens.MethodsTotal 125 strains of S. aureus isolated from different clinical samples at KIST Medical College and Teaching Hospital, Lalitpur, Nepal from Nov 2012 to June 2013, were subjected to MRSA detection by cefoxitin disc diffusion method. The minimum inhibitory concentrations of vancomycin to confirmed MRSA strains were determined by agar dilution method. Yellow colored colonies in mannitol salt agar, which were gram positive cocci, catalase positive and coagulase positive were confirmed to be S. aureus.ResultsAmong, total 125 S. aureus strains isolated; 47(37.6%) were MRSA. Minimum inhibitory concentrations of vancomycin to the strains of MRSA ranged from 0.125 μg/ml to 1 μg/ml.ConclusionFrom our findings we concluded that the rate of isolation of MRSA among all the strains of S. aureus isolated from clinical samples was very high. However, none of the MRSA strains were found to be vancomycin intermediate-sensitive or vancomycin-resistant.

. Mannitol salt agar was used to culture the nasal swabs. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed by KirbyBauer disc diffusion technique following Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains were confirmed by using cefoxitin disc and by determining the minimum inhibitory concentration of oxacillin by agar dilution method. Results:Of 252 healthcare workers, 46(18.3%) were positive for Staphylococcus aureus among which 19(41.3%) were Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus carriers. Overall rate of nasal carriage of Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus was 7.5% (19/252).The higher percentages of lab personnel were nasal carriers of S. aureus (31.6%) and Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (10.5%).The percentages of nasal carriage of S. aureus (35.7%) and Methicillinresistant Staphylococcus aureus (14.3%) were highest in the health care workers from post operative department. Higher percentage of Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus were susceptible toward amikacin (100%) and vancomycin (100%) followed by cotrimoxazole (84.2%). Conclusions:High rates of nasal carriage of S. aureus and Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus were observed among the healthcare workers, which indicate the need of strict infection control measures to be followed to control the nosocomial infections.