When administered at the initiation of allergen challenge, bolus treatment of Epi by i.m., i.v., or s.c. routes caused limited haemodynamic improvement in AS. In contrast, constant infusion of Epi at a lower total dose produced significant haemodynamic improvement. Within the limits of this anaesthetized canine model, the results suggest that CI should be the preferred route in the treatment of AS when this treatment option is available.

Background: Epinephrine (Epi) is the treatment of choice for reversing cardiovascular collapse in anaphylactic shock (AS). However, there are few data supporting its use in this condition, and most treatment guidelines have been anecdotally derived. In the present study, the time course of hemodynamic recovery from maximal hypotension was investigated in a canine model of AS in which Epi was administered by the intravenous (IV), subcutaneous (SQ) and intramuscular (IM) routes on different occasions. The findings obtained with Epi treatment were compared to those in a nontreatment study. Methods: Ragweed-sensitized dogs were examined in respective studies approximately 5 weeks apart in which Epi was administered by one of the above routes in a randomized design. Either Epi (0.01 mg/kg) or placebo was administered at maximal hypotension, and hemodynamics were followed for 3 h after shock. The animals were studied while ventilated and anesthetized. Mean arterial pressure (MAP), cardiac output, stroke volume (SV), pulmonary wedge pressure (Pwp) and plasma Epi concentrations were obtained at each measurement interval. Results: In the IV study, Epi produced a transient immediate increase in MAP, SV and Pwp as compared to the nontreatment study (144 vs. 52 mm Hg; 32 vs. 12 ml; 9 vs. 5 mm Hg; p < 0.01), but no differences were observed 15 min after shock. Hemodynamics were not different between Epi and no treatment at any intervals when Epi was given by the SQ and IM routes. AS compared with the placebo study, plasma Epi concentrations were higher in the IV and IM studies, but not in the SQ study. Conclusions: Although higher Epi concentrations were observed in the IM and IV studies, a sustained benefit in hemodynamic recovery was not observed in this anesthetized, ventilated canine model. In AS, when administered during maximum shock after mediators have already been released, a single IM, IV or SQ dose of Epi may have limited utility in the treatment of cardiovascular collapse. Earlier administration of Epi, before maximal hypotension occurs, may produce a more beneficial effect.

No abstract

In septic shock, the extent to which lactic acidosis (LA) is a consequence of splanchnic lactate overproduction (SLP) or impaired hepatic lactate extraction (HLE) is not clear. We examined SLP and HLE in E. coli sepsis in dogs. We further determined the effects of vasopressor treatments, which included phenylephrine, dopamine, norepinephrine, and a combination of dobutamine and norepinephrine treatment, on SLP and HLE in respective groups. The animals were studied while anesthetized and ventilated. During sepsis, SLP increased as compared with presepsis (-0.017 versus 0.07 mmol/min, p < 0.05), but this increase could not be explained by reduced splanchnic oxygen delivery (SOD). During sepsis, HLE increased as compared with baseline (0.8 versus 8%, p < 0.05), but was significantly lower than that found during lactic acid loading in nonseptic dogs. None of the vasopressor treatments had a detrimental effect on SLP. These results indicate that LA in sepsis occurs secondary to an increase in splanchnic lactate production that is not related to reduced splanchnic oxygen delivery, as well as to a decrease in hepatic lactate extraction. Effects of different vasoactive agents did not alter either splanchnic lactate production or hepatic lactate extraction in this sepsis model.

No abstract