SUMMARY Heterotrimetic G proteins consist of four subfamilies (GS, Gi/O, Gq/11, and G12/13) that mediate signaling via G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), principally by receptors binding Gα C termini. G-protein-coupling profiles govern GPCR-induced cellular responses, yet receptor sequence selectivity determinants remain elusive. Here, we systematically quantified ligand-induced interactions between 148 GPCRs and all 11 unique Gα subunit C termini. For each receptor, we probed chimeric Gα subunit activation via a transforming growth factor-α (TGF-α) shedding response in HEK293 cells lacking endogenous Gq/11 and G12/13 proteins, and complemented G-protein-coupling profiles through a NanoBiT-G-protein dissociation assay. Interrogation of the dataset identified sequence-based coupling specificity features, inside and outside the transmembrane domain, which we used to develop a coupling predictor that outperforms previous methods. We used the predictor to engineer designer GPCRs selectively coupled to G12. This dataset of fine-tuned signaling mechanisms for diverse GPCRs is a valuable resource for research in GPCR signaling.

β-Arrestins (βarrs) interact with G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) to desensitize G protein signaling, to initiate signaling on their own, and to mediate receptor endocytosis. Prior structural studies have revealed two unique conformations of GPCR-βarr complexes: the "tail" conformation, with βarr primarily coupled to the phosphorylated GPCR C-terminal tail, and the "core" conformation, where, in addition to the phosphorylated C-terminal tail, βarr is further engaged with the receptor transmembrane core. However, the relationship of these distinct conformations to the various functions of βarrs is unknown. Here, we created a mutant form of βarr lacking the "finger-loop" region, which is unable to form the core conformation but retains the ability to form the tail conformation. We find that the tail conformation preserves the ability to mediate receptor internalization and βarr signaling but not desensitization of G protein signaling. Thus, the two GPCR-βarr conformations can carry out distinct functions.O ver the past decade, significant efforts have been made to understand the molecular properties and regulatory mechanisms that control the function of β-arrestin (βarr) interactions with G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) (1, 2). Once activated, GPCRs initiate a highly conserved signaling and regulatory cascade marked by interactions with: (i) heterotrimeric G proteins, which mediate their actions largely by promoting second-messenger generation (3); (ii) GPCR kinases (GRKs), which phosphorylate activated conformations of receptors (4); and (iii) βarrs, which bind to the phosphorylated receptors to mediate desensitization of G protein signaling and receptor internalization (5, 6). In addition to their canonical function of desensitization and internalization, βarrs have been appreciated as independent signaling units by virtue of their crucial role as both adaptors and scaffolds for an increasing number of signaling pathways (7-11).There are two driving forces that mediate βarr interactions with an activated GPCR: phosphorylation of the C-terminal tail of the receptor by GRKs and/or binding to the transmembrane core of the receptor. How each of these interactions contributes to βarr functionality remains unclear. Moreover, GPCRs tend to either interact with βarr transiently, termed "class A" GPCRs [e.g., β 2 -adrenergic receptor (β 2 AR)], or tightly, known as "class B" GPCRs [e.g., vasopressin type 2 receptor (V 2 R)]. For the current study, we use a previously described chimeric β 2 V 2 R construct, which comprises the β 2 AR with its C-terminal tail exchanged with the V 2 R C-terminal tail (12-14). The β 2 V 2 R construct provides an ideal system for studying a GPCR-βarr complex in vitro, because it maintains identical pharmacological properties to the WT β 2 AR and has a robustly increased class B affinity for βarr1, which allows stable β 2 V 2 R-βarr complexes to be formed and purified.Structural insights have shed some light onto the complexity of the interaction between GPCRs and βarrs. A recent struc...

G protein-independent, arrestin-dependent signaling is a paradigm that broadens the signaling scope of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) beyond G proteins for numerous biological processes. However, arrestin signaling in the collective absence of functional G proteins has never been demonstrated. Here we achieve a state of “zero functional G” at the cellular level using HEK293 cells depleted by CRISPR/Cas9 technology of the Gs/q/12 families of Gα proteins, along with pertussis toxin-mediated inactivation of Gi/o. Together with HEK293 cells lacking β-arrestins (“zero arrestin”), we systematically dissect G protein- from arrestin-driven signaling outcomes for a broad set of GPCRs. We use biochemical, biophysical, label-free whole-cell biosensing and ERK phosphorylation to identify four salient features for all receptors at “zero functional G”: arrestin recruitment and internalization, but—unexpectedly—complete failure to activate ERK and whole-cell responses. These findings change our understanding of how GPCRs function and in particular of how they activate ERK1/2.

The β2 adrenergic receptor (β2AR) has provided a paradigm to elucidate how G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) control intracellular signaling, including the discovery that β-arrestins, which bind to ligand-activated GPCRs, are central for GPCR function. We used genome editing, conditional gene deletion, and siRNAs to determine the roles of β-arrestin (β-arr) 1 and 2 in β2AR internalization, trafficking, and signaling to ERK. We found that only β-arr2 was essential for β2AR internalization. Surprisingly, β-arr1 and β-arr2 and receptor internalization were dispensable for ERK activation. Instead, β2AR signaled through Gαs and Gβγ subunits through a pathway that involved the tyrosine kinase SRC, the adaptor protein SHC, the guanine nucleotide exchange factor SOS, the small GTPase RAS, and the kinases RAF and MEK, which led to ERK activation. These findings provide a molecular framework for β2AR signaling through β-arrestin-independent pathways in key physiological functions and pathological conditions.

The Hedgehog (Hh) pathway is essential for organ development, homeostasis, and regeneration. Dysfunction of this cascade drives several cancers. To control expression of pathway target genes, the G protein–coupled receptor (GPCR) Smoothened (SMO) activates glioma-associated (GLI) transcription factors via an unknown mechanism. Here, we show that, rather than conforming to traditional GPCR signaling paradigms, SMO activates GLI by binding and sequestering protein kinase A (PKA) catalytic subunits at the membrane. This sequestration, triggered by GPCR kinase (GRK)-mediated phosphorylation of SMO intracellular domains, prevents PKA from phosphorylating soluble substrates, releasing GLI from PKA-mediated inhibition. Our work provides a mechanism directly linking Hh signal transduction at the membrane to GLI transcription in the nucleus. This process is more fundamentally similar between species than prevailing hypotheses suggest. The mechanism described here may apply broadly to other GPCR- and PKA-containing cascades in diverse areas of biology.