Objective: Sphincterotomy is a well-established therapeutic option in male patients with neurogenic bladder dysfunction and detrusor-sphincter-dyssynergia due to spinal cord lesions. Indication and prediction of treatment outcome, however, are mainly based on clinical parameters. We analyzed the clinical usefulness of preoperative urodynamic evaluation for the prediction of success in patients undergoing external sphincterotomy. Materials and Methods: In a retrospective study, residual urine, retrograde perfusion pressure (RESP) and detrusor leak point pressure (DLPP) in 62 male patients with spinal cord injury were assessed before sphincterotomy. Data were compared to surgical success evaluated by postoperative DLPP and residual urine. Results: Sphincterotomy was successful in 85.4% of our patients. In multivariate analysis, both preoperative DLPP and RESP were superior to measurement of residual urine concerning prediction of surgical success. However, these differences were not statistically significant. Conclusion: To our knowledge, this is the first study to evaluate preoperative predictors for surgical success in patients undergoing sphincterotomy. Although urodynamic evaluation is strongly advised prior to surgery in patients with spinal cord lesions, it improves prediction of success only marginally.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.