HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of scientific research documents, whether they are published or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers. L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d'enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.

SummaryPegfilgrastim is a pegylated form of the granulocyte‐colony stimulating factor, filgrastim. Herein, we report the results of a multicentre, randomized, double‐blind phase III trial comparing the efficacy and safety of pegfilgrastim with filgrastim in patients with malignant lymphoma. Patients were randomized to receive either a single subcutaneous dose of pegfilgrastim or daily subcutaneous doses of filgrastim on day 4 after the completion of cyclophosphamide, cytarabine, etoposide and dexamethasone ± rituximab (CHASE(R); day 1–3) chemotherapy. The primary endpoint was the duration of severe neutropenia (DSN), defined as the number of days with neutrophil count <0·5 × 109/l in the first cycle of chemotherapy. A total of 111 lymphoma patients were randomized to either the pegfilgrastim or filgrastim group. 109 patients received either pegfilgrastim (n = 54) or filgrastim (n = 55). Efficacy data were available for 107 patients (pegfilgrastim: n = 53, filgrastim: n = 54). Both groups were well balanced in terms of gender, age, performance status and other variables. The mean DSN (±S.D.) was 4·5 (±1·2) and 4·7 (±1·3) d in the pegfilgrastim and filgrastim groups. No significant difference in safety was observed. This trial verified the non‐inferiority of a single subcutaneous dose of pegfilgrastim compared with daily subcutaneous doses of filgrastim, considering DSN as an indicator.

We retrospectively analyzed the results of 707 adult patients who underwent myeloablative peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT) (n = 365) and myeloablative bone marrow transplantation (BMT) (n = 342) for leukemia from HLA-identical sibling donors between 2000 and 2005 using the propensity score method. The results were obtained from the Japan Society for Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation registry. Multivariate Cox analysis showed that PBSCT was associated with lower overall survival (OS) in standard-risk patients [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) = 1.83; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.04-3.23; P = 0.036], but not in high-risk patients (aHR = 1.11; 95% CI 0.76-1.61; P = 0.599). Hematopoietic recovery was significantly faster after PBSCT. The risk of acquiring grade III-IV acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) (aHR = 2.23; P = 0.040) and extensive chronic GVHD (aHR = 1.93; P = 0.001) were significantly higher after PBSCT. PBSCT was associated with higher non-relapse mortality in standard-risk patients (aHR = 2.30; 95% CI 1.08-4.88; P = 0.030), but not in high-risk patients (aHR = 1.29; 95% CI 0.65-2.54; P = 0.468). Relapse after transplantation did not differ between PBSCT and BMT either in standard-risk group or in high-risk group (aHR = 1.17; 95% CI 0.55-2.52; P = 0.684 and aHR = 0.81; 95% CI 0.52-1.28; P = 0.370, respectively). In this retrospective analysis, OS was significantly lower after PBSCT in standard-risk patients, but not in high-risk patients. PBSCT was associated with significant risks of grade III-IV acute GVHD and extensive chronic GVHD.

The clinical efficacy did not differ between micafungin and voriconazole. Micafungin was generally better tolerated than voriconazole when given as an empirical antifungal therapy in patients with persistent fever and neutropenia.

We conducted a multicenter prospective randomized study to compare a fixed-scheduled induction therapy with a response-oriented individualized induction therapy for elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Newly diagnosed AML patients, aged between 65 and 80, were randomly assigned to receive fixed or individualized induction. Both groups received daunorubicin (DNR) 40 mg/m(2) for 3 days and behenoyl cytarabine (BHAC) 200 mg/m(2) for 8 days. In the individualized group, bone marrow biopsy was done on days 8 and 10, and according to the cellularity and blast ratio, the patients received additional DNR and BHAC for two to four more days. All patients achieving complete remission (CR) were randomized a second time to determine whether they would receive ubenimex. CR was obtained in 60.1 % of the fixed group and 63.6 % of the individualized group. Predicted 4-year relapse-free survival (RFS) was 9 % for the fixed group and 18 % for the individualized group. There were no statistically significant differences in CR and RFS between the fixed and individualized groups. In the ubenimex group, prolonged RFS was observed. Notably, gender was a prognostic factor in this study, as 102 female patients had a significantly higher CR rate (72.5 vs. 54.3 %, p = 0.0048) and better OS (24 vs. 14 % at 4 years, p = 0.018), compared with 140 male patients.