The accumulation of the human tumor suppressor 53BP1 at DNA damage sites requires the ubiquitin ligases RNF8 and RNF168. As 53BP1 recognizes dimethylated Lys20 in histone H4 (H4K20me2), the requirement for RNF8- and RNF168-mediated ubiquitylation has been unclear. Here we show that RNF8-mediated ubiquitylation facilitates the recruitment of the AAA-ATPase valosin-containing protein (VCP, also known as p97) and its cofactor NPL4 to sites of double-strand breaks. RIDDLE cells, which lack functional RNF168, also show impaired recruitment of VCP to DNA damage. The ATPase activity of VCP promotes the release of the Polycomb protein L3MBTL1 from chromatin, which also binds the H4K20me2 histone mark, thereby facilitating 53BP1 recruitment. Consistent with this, nematodes lacking the VCP orthologs CDC-48.1 or CDC-48.2, or cofactors UFD-1 or NPL-4, are highly sensitive to ionizing radiation. Our data suggest that human RNF8 and RNF168 promote VCP-mediated displacement of L3MBTL1 to unmask 53BP1 chromatin binding sites.

In addition to its role in DNA lesion recognition, the damaged DNA-binding protein DDB2 elicits unfolding of large-scale chromatin structure independently of the CRL4 ubiquitin ligase complex.

The ubiquitin ligases RNF8 and RNF168 orchestrate DNA damage signalling through the ubiquitylation of histone H2A and the recruitment of downstream repair factors. Here, we demonstrate that RNF8, but not RNF168 or the canonical H2A ubiquitin ligase RNF2, mediates extensive chromatin decondensation. Our data show that CHD4, the catalytic subunit of the NuRD complex, interacts with RNF8 and is essential for RNF8-mediated chromatin unfolding. The chromatin remodelling activity of CHD4 promotes efficient ubiquitin conjugation and assembly of RNF168 and BRCA1 at DNA double-strand breaks. Interestingly, RNF8-mediated recruitment of CHD4 and subsequent chromatin remodelling were independent of the ubiquitin-ligase activity of RNF8, but involved a non-canonical interaction with the forkhead-associated (FHA) domain. Our study reveals a new mechanism of chromatin remodelling-assisted ubiquitylation, which involves the cooperation between CHD4 and RNF8 to create a local chromatin environment that is permissive to the assembly of checkpoint and repair machineries at DNA lesions.

The SUMO‐targeted ubiquitin ligase RNF4 functions at the crossroads of the SUMO and ubiquitin systems. Here, we report that the deubiquitylation enzyme (DUB) ataxin‐3 counteracts RNF4 activity during the DNA double‐strand break (DSB) response. We find that ataxin‐3 negatively regulates ubiquitylation of the checkpoint mediator MDC1, a known RNF4 substrate. Loss of ataxin‐3 markedly decreases the chromatin dwell time of MDC1 at DSBs, which can be fully reversed by co‐depletion of RNF4. Ataxin‐3 is recruited to DSBs in a SUMOylation‐dependent fashion, and in vitro it directly interacts with and is stimulated by recombinant SUMO, defining a SUMO‐dependent mechanism for DUB activity toward MDC1. Loss of ataxin‐3 results in reduced DNA damage‐induced ubiquitylation due to impaired MDC1‐dependent recruitment of the ubiquitin ligases RNF8 and RNF168, and reduced recruitment of 53BP1 and BRCA1. Finally, ataxin‐3 is required for efficient MDC1‐dependent DSB repair by non‐homologous end‐joining and homologous recombination. Consequently, loss of ataxin‐3 sensitizes cells to ionizing radiation and poly(ADP‐ribose) polymerase inhibitor. We propose that the opposing activities of RNF4 and ataxin‐3 consolidate robust MDC1‐dependent signaling and repair of DSBs.

The ubiquitin receptors Rad23 and Dsk2 deliver polyubiquitylated substrates to the proteasome for destruction. The C-terminal ubiquitin-associated (UBA) domain of Rad23 functions as a cis-acting stabilization signal that protects this protein from proteasomal degradation. Here, we provide evidence that the C-terminal UBA domains guard ubiquitin receptors from destruction by preventing initiation of degradation at the proteasome. We show that introduction of unstructured polypeptides that are sufficiently long to function as initiation sites for degradation abrogates the protective effect of UBA domains. Vice versa, degradation of substrates that contain an unstructured extension can be attenuated by the introduction of C-terminal UBA domains. Our study gains insight into the molecular mechanism responsible for the protective effect of UBA domains and explains how ubiquitin receptors can shuttle substrates to the proteasome without themselves becoming subject to proteasomal degradation.