Considering the similar surgical success rates, and disadvantageous factors such as granulation formation, patient discomfort, and cost related to intubation, we recommend endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy without intubation as the treatment of choice in cases of chronic epiphora due to postsaccal stenosis of the lacrimal drainage system.

Our data provided both objective and subjective evidence that leukotriene receptor antagonist-antihistamine combination therapy is more effective than antihistamine alone in the control of allergic rhinitis symptoms.

ED was determined in a high percentage of patients with NP and significantly ameliorated after FESS. NP might present a risk factor in the development of ED.

Nasal congestion is a cardinal symptom of allergic rhinitis (AR). It is associated with decreased quality of life and difficult to treat as perceived by the patients. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the mid-term objective and subjective outcomes of management of nasal congestion using intranasal steroid (INS) therapy or radiofrequency turbinoplasty (RFT) in patients with persistent AR who have mucosal hypertrophy of the inferior turbinate. Fifty-five adult patients with AR, who claimed nasal congestion refractory to oral antihistamine (desloratadine) therapy, were randomized to INS (mometasone furoate) or temperature-controlled RFT treatment groups. Outcomes were determined by active anterior rhinomanometry, visual analog scale (VAS), and rhinoconjunctivitis quality of life questionnaire (RQLQ) at least 12 months after treatment. The median total nasal resistance decreased from 0.49 ± 0.17 to 0.39 ± 0.12 Pa/cm(3)/s (p = 0.42), and from 0.51 ± 0.18 to 0.29 ± 0.07 Pa/cm(3)/s (p = 0.003) with INS and RFT, respectively. RFT provided a better reduction in the perception of congestion in VAS scores. RQLQ scores improved significantly in both groups 1 year after treatment (mean follow-up 14.2 months) (p < 0.05). No adverse reactions were encountered in either group. Nasal congestion refractory to antihistamine appears to be improved by INS at some point, while reduced significantly by RFT in objective and subjective parameters. Both options are also effective in increasing the quality of life in patients with AR. RFT might be a safe and effective treatment of option in AR compared with INS.

The favorable outcome was attributable to rapid correction of the underlying medical condition; wide local excision and debridement of all involved and devitalized sinonasal and periorbital tissue, while establishing adequate sinus and orbital drainage; daily endoscopic assessment with multiple sinus debridement when necessary; daily irrigation of the involved areas; and high-dose i.v. amphotericin B.