Intracoelomic implantation of transmitters into fish requires making a surgical incision, incision closure, and other surgery related techniques; however, the tools and techniques used in the surgical process vary widely. We review the available literature and focus on tools and techniques used for conducting surgery on juvenile salmonids because of the large amount of research that is conducted on them. The use of sterilized surgical instruments properly selected for a given size of fish will minimize tissue damage and infection rates, and speed the wound healing of fish implanted with transmitters. For the implantation of transmitters into small fish, the optimal surgical methods include making an incision on the ventral midline along the linea alba (for studies under 1 month), protecting the viscera (by lifting the skin with forceps while creating the incision), and using absorbable monofilament suture with a small-swaged-on swaged-on tapered or reverse-cutting needle. Standardizing the implantation techniques to be used in a study involving particular species and age classes of fish will improve survival and transmitter retention while allowing for comparisons to be made among studies and across multiple years. This review should be useful for researchers working on juvenile salmonids and other sizes and species of fish.

This study assessed performance of seven suture types in subyearling Chinook salmon Oncorhynchus tshawytscha implanted with acoustic microtransmitters and held at two water temperatures (128C and 178C). Nonabsorbable (Ethilon) and absorbable (Monocryl) monofilament sutures and nonabsorbable (Nurolon and silk) and absorbable (Vicryl, Vicryl Plus, and Vicryl Rapide) braided sutures were used to close incisions in Chinook salmon. When differences existed among suture types, tag and suture retention were generally highest for monofilament sutures. Wound inflammation and ulceration were generally lower for Ethilon and Monocryl than for most of the braided sutures. In this study, Nurolon (braided) often resulted in low wound inflammation and ulceration, although suture retention was poor. Generally, fish held in 128C water had more desirable postsurgery healing characteristics (i.e., higher tag and suture retention; lower incision openness, wound inflammation, and ulceration) at 7 and 14 d postsurgery than fish held in 178C water. On days 34 and 63, tag retention remained high among fish in 128C water, while suture retention decreased dramatically in both water temperatures. We found a significant effect of surgeon on tag and suture retention, wound inflammation and ulceration, and incision openness. Surgeons in this study were initially thought to have similar surgical proficiency based on their extensive previous experience. However, surgeons who had received feedback on their previous surgical technique performed better in this study. Results indicate that surgical training (i.e., feedback) and perhaps aptitude, rather than surgeon experience alone, may be as important as suture type in influencing the retention of sutures and tags. The overall results support the conclusion that Monocryl is the best suture material for closing incisions created during surgical implantation of acoustic microtransmitters in subyearling Chinook salmon. Future research should include testing different suturing patterns and knotting techniques as well as the number of knots required for different incision lengths.

The influence of surgical implantation of an acoustic transmitter on the swimming performance, growth and survival of juvenile sockeye salmon Oncorhynchus nerka and Chinook salmon Oncorhynchus tshawytscha was examined. The transmitter had a mass of 0Á7 g in air while sockeye salmon had a mass of 7Á0-16Á0 g and Chinook salmon had a mass of 6Á7-23Á1 g (a transmitter burden of 4Á5-10Á3% for sockeye salmon and 3Á1-10Á7% for Chinook salmon). Mean critical swimming speeds (U crit ) for Chinook salmon ranged from 47Á5 to 51Á2 cm s À1 [4Á34-4Á69 body lengths (fork length, L F ) s À1 ] and did not differ among tagged, untagged and sham-tagged groups. Tagged sockeye salmon, however, did have lower U crit than control or sham fish. The mean U crit for tagged sockeye salmon was 46Á1 cm s À1 (4Á1 L F s À1 ), which was c. 5% less than the mean U crit for control and sham fish (both groups were 48Á6 cm s À1 or 4Á3 L F s À1 ). A laboratory evaluation determined that there was no difference in L F or mass among treatments (control, sham or tag) either at the start or at the end of the test period, suggesting that implantation did not negatively influence the growth of either species. None of the sockeye salmon held under laboratory conditions died from the influence of surgical implantation of transmitters. In contrast, this study found that the 21 day survival differed between tagged and control groups of Chinook salmon, although this result may have been confounded by the poor health of Chinook salmon treatment groups. # 2006 Battelle Memorial Institute

A substantial percentage of the Pacific salmon Oncorhynchus spp. and steelhead O. mykiss smolts that emigrate to the ocean each year are smaller than 110 mm (fork length). However, relatively few researchers have implanted acoustic transmitters in fish of this size, and none have reported minimum fish lengths below 110 mm for which the tag burden did not negatively influence growth or survival. The influence of a surgically implanted acoustic microtransmitter and a passive integrated transponder (PIT) tag on the growth and survival of hatchery‐reared juvenile Chinook salmon was examined over a period of 30 d. Growth and survival were compared between treatment (tagged) and control (untagged) fish within three size‐groups (80–89, 90–99, and 100–109 mm). The acoustic microtransmitter and PIT tag implanted in our study had a combined weight of 0.74 g; the combined tag burden for implanted fish ranged from 4.5% to 15.7%. The results indicated that growth and survival among implanted juvenile Chinook salmon were size dependent. Significant differences in growth rate and survival were observed between treatment and control fish in the 80–89‐mm group. The survival of implanted fish smaller than 11.1 g (tag burden, >6.7%) and the growth of fish smaller than 9.0 g (tag burden, >8.2%) were negatively affected by the implantation or presence of an acoustic microtransmitter and PIT tag. The results of this study will aid researchers in determining the minimum fish size suitable for use in acoustic telemetry studies that estimate the short‐term (30‐d) survival and growth of juvenile salmonids.

The objective of this study was to determine whether juvenile Chinook salmon Oncorhynchus tshawytscha are negatively influenced by the intraperitoneal implantation of acoustic transmitters. We evaluated swimming performance and predator avoidance of juvenile salmonids implanted with acoustic transmitters that weighed up to 6.7% of the fish's body weight in air. Critical swimming speeds (U crit ) of tagged, sham-tagged (surgery but no tag), and control fish were measured in a respirometer to determine tag effects on swimming performance. Swimming performance was similar among treatment groups at 1-d and 21-d postsurgery intervals. Predator avoidance of fish implanted with active tags was evaluated to determine whether tagged fish were impaired by the operation of the tags or predators were attracted to the signals emitted from the tags. Predator avoidance was evaluated by comparing the proportion of each treatment group consumed (active tag, inactive tag, sham, and control) during exposure to piscivorous adult rainbow trout O. mykiss. Surgical implantation of acoustic tags in juvenile fall Chinook salmon did not significantly affect swimming performance. Implantation of acoustic transmitters (active and inactive) did not result in greater predation susceptibility in tagged fish than in untagged fish.